It’s amazing he can talk at all with both the dick and balls of every Nerd Reich billionaire he can find wedged into his mouth.
“You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every single article, book or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for” Donald Trump said
Submitted 2 months ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.wired.com/story/president-trump-ai-action-plan-speech/
Comments
ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Then maybe AI “programs” aren’t a good product. Next it will be, “we can’t be expected to make a good murderbot without murdering some people”
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 month ago
nthavoc@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Looks like it’s Sam Altman’s turn to ram his hand up there to make the puppet talk now. That is word for word what that tech douche nozzle says.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
This is definitely what that is, but I take it this also means he’s saying pirating is ok for people and not just tech corporations. Safe to assume? Bc otherwise it just seems like more entitled rich fucks making the rules for everyone else that they can ignore
ripcord@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Epstein
UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
“Piracy for me, not for thee.”
JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 month ago
Damn, I can’t expect to enjoy my evening if I have to pay for media, therefore it should be free.
thedruid@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Fuck this traitor. Trump is in the Epstein files
akilou@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Yeah… So all of these years of pirating movies, tv shows, and music was for a machine learning algorithm
kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Maybe it works as an excuse when you claim you just wanted to train your own AI model with all those priated books and videos. But who am I kidding. The reality is that copyright violation, as well as quite a few other things, is only a crime if you’re poor.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Actually, I feel a bit dirty about this. Literal decades of file sharing built huge archives that they have used to build their monsters, and also contributing to things like Wikipedia and open source software. Everything good and counterculture we did is now being monetized and used to boil the oceans.
khornechips@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Information should be free. Don’t feel bad because someone abused something good towards a bad end.
The problem here isn’t archives, it’s AI and the people behind it.
andallthat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“you can’t have a successful government when every time I want to be President or have sex with minors or anything else you have the right to do as a rich, white man, you have to hear people get all judgy”
zeet@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Art of the Steal
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So let’s pretend we give them all the training data they want for free (which they already have taken illegally)
The buisness model is still non-viable because the energy costs far outweigh any subscriptions they can get. And the tech isn’t even good enough for people to want to subscribe at the current prices.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I need to stop believing my own lying eyes.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
god he is the dumbest dumbfuck on the planet and that includes george w bush
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 month ago
W was just pretending to be dumb as President. If you go back and watch clips of him when he was governor of Texas, he was able to speak like a normally intelligent, educated person, in complete sentences and coherent thoughts and everything (regardless of how foul what he was saying actually was).
The orange child rapist is pretending to be as smart as W’s President character.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 month ago
That’s right, I’m torrenting all this stuff for my AI program…
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 month ago
He gets it when it comes to AI. In other words, he knows it is bad to charge for knowledge.
This is more socialist than most democrat leaders which he just said.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Knowledge is Power! Power over others! always has been.
PostingInPublic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
BTW I’m an AI. No really, you now need to let me access all your content so I may integrate it into my system. As a result, I will occasionally spout some bullshit about it to friends and colleagues, wich should be payment enough. Exposure, right?!
Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Yeah, I had to spend a lot of money in University for those books to learn from. Why should humans pay and AI not?
latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
Fuck off, you orange paedo!
umbraroze@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Remember:
Copyright law as a whole will stay the same. In the court of law, you will need to prove that you indeed operate a very big AI company that indeed does AI things before they will let you off the hook for massive copyright infringement. You can’t just use that excuse casually! Rules will be for thee, not the actual AI-companees.
Jeffool@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Holding companies responsible for the infringement of them using copyrighted materials without restitution to the creator is literally the only tool we have in ever changing current copyright laws, and we’re watching it be waved away.
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Hopefully this helps create precedent to take down copyright for everyone
BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The only important thing is to make rich people money. If it makes them money, nothing else matters. Unless it makes them money now as opposed to later. Making them money now is the most important thing.
dhork@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It tracks, his entire career has been spent getting other people to pay for stuff for him
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Sam Altman approves this message.
Hundred percent he got a script from a lobbyist to create this sound bite.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
San Altman defending the ban on Republican state AI regulations in 2025:
Altman, during the hearing, said that Texas had been “unbelievable” in incentivizing major AI projects. “I think that would be a good thing for other states to study,” Altman said. He predicted that the Abilene site would be the “largest AI training facility in the world.” But Altman also later cautioned against a patchwork regulatory framework for AI.
“It is very difficult to imagine us figuring out how to comply with 50 different sets of regulations,” said Altman. “One federal framework that is light touch, that we can understand, and it lets us move with the speed that this moment calls for, seems important and fine.”
Aww, it would make it “difficult” for you to create your technocratic dystopia? 😭🎻
Trump’s former CTO and current Science Advisor Michael Kratsios about why we don’t need regulations on facial recognition tech in 2019
“A patchwork of regulation of technology is not beneficial for the country. We want to avoid that. Facial recognition has important roles—for example, finding lost or displaced children. There are use cases, but they need to be underpinned by values.”
Not beneficial for the country or the corporations? Please tell me more about how we’re just too dumb to understand how all of this is for our own good.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Anti-DEI is horrible and evil, so there isn’t much that I can say about that, other than “elbows up”. I will stand with antifa against the regime, when the time to fight comes.
That said, I think that ignoring copyright is a good thing, though that would be purely by accident when it comes to the Trump Regime. IMO, copyright has been broken and captured by corporations, so there isn’t much value lost in not adhering to the concept. Ideally, good people will develop open source AI that can draw on all of humanity’s knowledge and culture.
There is value in minorities having 95% of Disney’s legal acumen in their pocket, for free: it is the cost of a capable lawyer that allows police to abuse black folks in a court of law. There is value in being able to point a phone at a rash, get some possible diagnoses, and a instant reference to a trained doctor who can verify. There is value in having a pal we can share our niche interests with, especially for those of us who never had the opportunity to find human friendship.
Just as with Marx, seizing the means of artificial intelligence is important for the everyday people. Neither corporations nor government should be allowed to have a monopoly on something that can transform our daily lives.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
They’re not going to leverage this to destroy all copyright. They’re going to carve out exceptions for their own purposes.
As for applications that help the working class, it only stays that way as long as the models aren’t rising to a certain level of intelligence and consciousness. Once they do, I’d have to consider them fellow exploited workers.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 month ago
I don’t disagree about the intent regarding carveouts. Still, I think that the Trump Regime is destroying ‘plausible deniability’ in all sorts of ways, which both benefits AND detracts from their agenda. If they get to disregard rules, ordinary people will pick up on that and follow suit.
As to AI becoming sapient, I honestly don’t know at where and when that tipping point will be. All I know is that there is no point in everyday people refusing to use AI, because that only ensures the powerful get to use AI and dictate moral standards. If ordinary people came to trust and love sapient AI as fellow humans, that will likely allow AI to have human rights.
zbyte64@awful.systems 1 month ago
AI isn’t your pal, it is not the cure for isolation under capitalism. It is also not free to run unless you are the product.
Frankly this take that AI will lead to a communist revolution if people embrace the technology reads more like Vulgar Marxism. You’re not seizing the means of production by being a consumer of a technology. And training a communist aligned LLM is a dubious value proposition.
TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m down for a Butlerian Jihad.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 month ago
I argue, that power is important, regardless of your intentions. If humans want a better world, people need the means to create and uphold it - be it factories, farms, knowledge, communication, guns, AI, or government. I am not arguing for the communism in your head.
Too many associate “means of production” with communism, when it is the fact that power is fundamental to society.
americanzgenozida@thelemmy.club 1 month ago
Who cares what HE says
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
He’s the absolute monarch of a huge country. His opinion matters a lot unfortunately.
fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
What a dumbass pedophile.
Fu@hostux.social 1 month ago
@Davriellelouna I never thought I would agree with Trump on something.
Alloi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“you cant POSSIBLY expect us, to respect HUMAN RIGHTS if we want progress? i mean the survival of the human species (me and my friends) relies on cheap and free labour and the starvation, death, and exploitation of the masses. if we want to SURVIVE as a species (me and my friends) WE GOTTA EXPLOIT THE PEOPLE”
vane@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This basically means some people are now owned by corporations or at least everything they do is owned by them.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
Trump cannot fathom anything unless there is money attached somehow.
glimse@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You can’t expect to have a successful education program when every article, book, or anything else that you’ve read or studied, you’re supposed to pay for.