FatCrab

@FatCrab@slrpnk.net

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Creative Commons is Introducing CC Signals: A New Social Contract for the Age of AI⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  There are many open sourced locally executable free generative models available.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  You are agreeing with the post you responded to. This ruling is only about training a model on legally obtained training data. It does not say it is ok to pirate works–if you pirate a work, no matter what you do with the infringing copy you’ve made, you’ve committed copyright infringement. It does not talk about model outputs, which is a very nuanced issue and likely to fall along similar analyses as music copyright imo. It only talks about whether training a model is intrinsically an infringement of copyright. And it isn’t because anything else is insane and be functionally impossible to differentiate from learning a writing technique by reading a book you bought from an author. Even a model that has overfit training data, it is in no way recognizable to any particular training datum. It’s hyperdimensioned matrix of numbers defining relationships between features and relationships between relationships.