Anyone who has been surfing the web for a while is probably used to clicking through a CAPTCHA grid of street images, identifying everyday objects to prove that they’re a human and not an automated bot. Now, though, new research claims that locally run bots using specially trained image-recognition models can match human-level performance in this style of CAPTCHA, achieving a 100 percent success rate despite being decidedly not human.
ETH Zurich PhD student Andreas Plesner and his colleagues’ new research, available as a pre-print paper, focuses on Google’s ReCAPTCHA v2, which challenges users to identify which street images in a grid contain items like bicycles, crosswalks, mountains, stairs, or traffic lights. Google began phasing that system out years ago in favor of an “invisible” reCAPTCHA v3 that analyzes user interactions rather than offering an explicit challenge.
Despite this, the older reCAPTCHA v2 is still used by millions of websites. And even sites that use the updated reCAPTCHA v3 will sometimes use reCAPTCHA v2 as a fallback when the updated system gives a user a low “human” confidence rating.
And yet I can’t beat the CAPTCHAs because reCAPTCHA doesn’t like VPNs lol
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 month ago
This is actually a good sign for self driving. Google was using this data aaca training set for Waymo. If AI is accumulating identifying vehicles and traffic markings, it should be able to process interactions with them easier.
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
As I understand it, the point of those captchas was never really “bots can’t identify these things” (though you’re right on that it was used to train). They use cursor movement, clicks, and other behaviours while you’re solving it to detect if you are a bot or not.
Grimy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The image choosing was always just to train their own bots
Takumidesh@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s a combination.
Not captchas goals generally aren’t 100% prevention, it’s to put a workload in front, this makes spamming the site cost money, a bankrolled attempt could just as easily outsource the captchas to real humans.
Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Since I started getting good at yosu and that fishing mini game in farmrpg I’ve been failing more captchas. I wonder if they’re related knowing this
nieceandtows@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Is that why I’m asked to do this over and over for 14 million times when I’m on a VPN?
grue@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The annoying thing is that they held us hostage for our free labor, but the results are proprietary for Google’s benefit only.
That training data ought to be forced to be made freely available to the public, since we’re the ones who actually created it.
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
i hope you’re joking. please, tell me you’re joking?
x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Well reCaptcha v1 was used for the digitization of books. And that they proudly talked about.
But to be honest, the pictures were in fact used to dether bots. But also to teach selfdriving cars. I think I also remember a time they used to ask to fill in house numbers probably for their Maps accuracy.
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Its never been confirmed by Google, so I may be wrong. It still tracks that the data harvesting company with a self driving car project that uses human labor to identify road hazards would integrate the two projects.
crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Afaik this is precisely what the captcha data was intended for - training AI models. Originally leveraged machine learning. LLMs are a slightly different paradigm but same purpose and results here.