aidan
@aidan@lemmy.world
- Comment on The Patriarchy 5 days ago:
If you’re intention is to scare people who didn’t sign up for it iirc that is assault.
- Comment on Thomas Edison was the Elon musk of his era 2 weeks ago:
Nixon Foundation has been posting edits of him on their Youtube channel, tons of pro-Nixon comments
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Headline is just a lie, its not banned
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
IMO you should change it when its deceptive clickbait
- Comment on Possible snipers seen at OSU. Administration says they're not snipers but should be treated like they are. 3 weeks ago:
You saved the day right? Oh no that is just the start, since the round fired was a 7.62x51mm NATO (there is no “rubber” round for this firearm) it went straight through the torso of that protester with a box knife and into and then back out of at least a few other people
High angle means it would likely go into the ground. Also could use hollow point though, I don’t know if police use hollow point on rifles.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
no one person is single handedly making decisions for everyone else on a given subject.
No, as I said, the best you can get when you have a unrestricted democratic government is the majority making decisions for the minority. That’s still not good.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Yeahhh I definitely disagree this is a fundamental truth. Not because you’re necessarily wrong from your perspective, but because we have fundamentally different values.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Being effected doesn’t mean there is a “we” that is justified in making decisions for others
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Both migrant workers and those with Down Syndrome
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Saying “no your insult of me is wrong” is totally useless. But apparently if I don’t explicitly say it you will then use that to attack me. So no, your insult of me is wrong. I was referring to civilizations that were built without oppression. I gave 1 example of oppression that led to the building of Iceland, and 2 examples of ongoing oppression. You decided to latch onto one because you interpreted it as me saying continuous oppression. I called out you not addressing the rest and you ignored it. So yeah no, I don’t really have an interest in talking to someone who seeks to maliciously interpret people.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
What? Why would I say that unless that’s how I interpreted it. That’s obvious. You were the one arguing that’s not what I said.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
I wrote the initial goalpost, you interpreted differently than I intended. Okay, so then acknowledge the two other things I pointed out that are addressing how you interpreted what I wrote.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
There are plenty of people who homestead. Are they at least out of the we? And I never disagreed that most people rely on each other. Instead I disagree that that mutual reliance makes a collective of people with the same desires, interests, and goals.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Well it’s not everyone, both those things effect people differently. Even if I live in a country with decaying infrastructure- if I barely go outside it doesn’t effect me that much. Or, I may value infrastructure or the climate differently than you.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
I did?
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
You only addressed one of 3 things I pointed out.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
What is the we?
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
I didn’t say it did.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
And I addressed other groups being currently oppressed.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Agreed, but there is no we. You shouldn’t make decisions for me either.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
I’d prefer people making decisions for themselves as much as possible.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
That’s not what I said
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Not on Iceland, before moving to Iceland.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
After they enriched themselves by pillaging the work of others. Also let’s not forget the widespread (almost 100%) abortion of those diagnosed with down syndrome pre-birth. So when you prevent the disadvantaged from even being born its pretty easy to not oppress them. Furthermore, Iceland like the rest of Europe, does have a bit of bullying of Polish(and other) migrants- but I have no clue how wide spread it is.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
The difference is generally they make it voluntary
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
We individually aren’t, in theory the majority on any issue is.
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Sadly people like to tell other people what to do
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
How is that any different from the current system. Just instead of relying on people voluntarily helping them, they’re relying on beuracrats
- Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?" 4 weeks ago:
Can you name a functional civilization without oppressing some minority populations? Does that mean oppressing minority populations is good or necessary?
- Comment on But how would they be able to live on that? 4 weeks ago:
Valuation is based on extrapolation of observed shares of company being transacted, if you have sole ownership, there’s no market rate to use for accounting.
That’s my point. Furthermore valuation almost always doesn’t represent anything liquifiable.