cypherpunks
@cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
- Comment on Star Trek TNG Intro but with Enterprise Lyrics 1 week ago:
In Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476 (1957), the Court sustained a conviction under a federal statute punishing the mailing of “obscene, lewd, lascivious or filthy . . .” materials. The key to that holding was the Court’s rejection of the claim that obscene materials were protected by the First Amendment. Five Justices joined in the opinion stating:
"All ideas having even the slightest redeeming social importance – unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion – have the full protection of the [First Amendment] guaranties, unless excludable because they encroach upon the limited area of more important interests. But implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. . . . This is the same judgment expressed by this Court in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U. S. 568, 315 U. S. 571-572: "
". . . There are certain well defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene. . . . It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality. . . ."
[Emphasis by Court in Roth opinion.]
- Comment on You can count past 1,000 on your fingers by using binary, instead of just 10 1 week ago:
- Comment on You don't have to use gyroelongation 1 week ago:
- Submitted 1 week ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 16 comments
- Comment on Evolution be like... 1 week ago:
later:
4-panel comic from pbfcomics.com with whales and speech bubbles. first panel has a whale saying: “Gentleman… our waters are in great danger.” Second panel: “Perhaps we should follow the path of the devonian sea creatures, and adapt to walk on land”. Third panel: no text. Fourth panel: a different whale says: “Barry. Shut the fuck up… seriously.” 📎
- Comment on 🐦⬛ Blackbird singing in the dead of night... (人´▽`*)♪ 3 weeks ago:
i added some links in my crosspost of this in !emoji@lemmy.ml:
- ‘It’s surreal’: US sanctions lock International Criminal Court judge out of daily lifewww.irishtimes.com ↗Submitted 3 weeks ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 1 comment
- Comment on "It is the year 2000. But where are the flying cars? I was promised flying cars. I don't see any flying cars. Why? Why?" 4 weeks ago:
Holla at me when there’s an AI clothes robot.
It’s a hard problem, but some of the scientists of all time are working on it:
It took a decade for FoldiMate to admit defeat and declare bankruptcy, but Laundroid accomplished the same task in only four years - so, soon, we could have robotics companies able to give up in under a year!
- "It is the year 2000. But where are the flying cars? I was promised flying cars. I don't see any flying cars. Why? Why?"lemmy.ml ↗Submitted 4 weeks ago to risa@startrek.website | 7 comments
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 5 weeks ago:
I can tell you that the GitHub code isn’t the code that’s used
really? given that the license is AGPL and they do have some external contributors, they shouldn’t be running an unpublished branch of the code!
- Comment on Here is a more polished release of nanogram. Fully compatible on raspberry pi now. 5 weeks ago:
look at their responses in the .ml cross-post,
that post is now deleted, but you can see their modlog here
- Google's latest reason to give them $14/month: "Watch in faster playback speeds with Premium"lemmy.ml ↗Submitted 5 weeks ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 102 comments
- Comment on I hate how inescapable politics are on Lemmy, but ya know, at least nobody's constantly asking how I wipe my butt or pick up my dog's poop then completely ignoring me when I try to answer. 1 month ago:
Did you miss that OP mentioned they’re blind?
Here is that image you posted, but with manually-written alt text added.
(I don’t usually do this when adding alt tags but in this case I also added the same text as a title/tooltip to make it also easy to read for users without a screen reader. Apologies to screen reader users that this probably causes you to hear the description twice.) A meme with three rows and two columns. The first row has the heading ‘Two sexes’, above a picture of a white male-presenting person (labeled ‘male’) on the left, and two female-presenting people (labeled ‘political’) on the right. The second row has the heading ‘Two sexualities’, above a straight couple (labeled ‘straight’), and two same-sex couples (labeled ‘political’). The third row has the heading ‘Two races’ above a picture of the same white man (labeled ‘white’), and three non-white people (labeled ‘political’).
- Comment on YSK about Project 100,000, when the US conscripted people with mental disabilities to be used as cannon fodder in Vietnam, suffering triple the casualties of other soldiers 1 month ago:
see also: Conscription of people with disabilities. It’s ongoing in present-day Ukraine.
- Why did the proposed *Red Sea–Dead Sea Water Conveyance* project involve pumping water instead of siphoning it?en.wikipedia.org ↗Submitted 1 month ago to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world | 7 comments
- Comment on Do people know what the Streisand effect was about? 1 month ago:
it was about this photograph
The original image of Barbra Streisand’s cliff-top residence in Malibu, California, which she attempted to suppress in 2003 Of course I went to the wikipedia article to get a link the actual image to post here, but, to answer your question: yes I did in fact remember what the photo looks like without looking it up.
- Comment on WHY??? 1 month ago:
either that, or
- Comment on Honestly wtf? 1 month ago:
not the first time OP is raising questions like this 🤔
- Comment on Israel’s IDF Bans Android Phones—iPhones Now ‘Mandatory’ 1 month ago:
I think you misunderstood me
> Go ahead and post the same link for Google job listings. I’ll wait. My comment was in response to your comments (bolded below) in this thread: >>>> I was already thinking of getting a Linux phone next, this is helping to seal the deal. Fuck Apple the genocide enablers. >>> >>> please do explain how Apple is doing anything here. If Israel wants to provide their military with iPhones they’re going to no matter what Apple does. >> >> They don’t have to do business with/in Israel. > > That still will not stop a nation state (especially Israel) from getting their hands on Apple devices. My point was not to say that Google is better than Apple here - in fact, unlike Apple (as far as I know), Google has actually built AI tools specifically tailored for Israel’s genocidal business requirements. My point is that if Apple wanted to boycott a country (which in the case of Israel they obviously don’t, which job listings at their R&D centers are just one of many points of evidence of) it would actually make it difficult-to-impossible for any substantial part of the boycotted country’s government to rely on using iPhones. (Unlike Android derivatives which can easily be used without direct reliance on Google’s services…) As an aside, while I would not use iOS for philosophical reasons, it is hard to dispute that (for most adversaries, at least) compromising it is generally much more expensive/difficult/unlikely than Android. So, given that Apple is friendly to them, the IDF’s policy decision to use iPhones makes sense.
- Comment on Israel’s IDF Bans Android Phones—iPhones Now ‘Mandatory’ 1 month ago:
Physically obtaining the devices is insufficient; they need ongoing software updates and other network services too.
The IDF could/would absolutely not be doing this if they did not trust that Apple is a very committed partner.
You can also observe from Apple’s job listings that they are.
- Comment on Whats going on in YSK? 1 month ago:
YSK: lemmy growth passed the appealing-to-spammers threshold a long time ago; please do report spam to help mods/admins see and delete it
- Comment on I just 💚 them and think they're neat. 1 month ago:
the process has a great name: Kleptoplasty
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Wtf. Why do Israeli tanks look like IRL Dall-E?
I rescind my remark.
no, you were right - even though it is based on an actual photo, it is also slop, because someone upscaled a low res version using a neural network.
compare the tank tracks in OP’s image with the high res original photo:
closeup of tank track on OP’s AI upscaled slop image same closeup in high-res original photo
- YSK: The Invention Secrecy Act is a US federal law authorizing the government to suppress disclosure of certain inventions for reasons of national security. 6,543 inventions are currently suppressed.en.wikipedia.org ↗Submitted 2 months ago to youshouldknow@lemmy.world | 89 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 8 comments
- Comment on The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing" 2 months ago:
I haven’t heard of academics and/or media from China advocating for applications of phrenology/physiognomy or other related racist pseudosciences. Have you?
- Comment on The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing" 2 months ago:
one can also get the full paper directly from yale here without needing to solve a google captcha:
…yale.edu/…/AI Personality Extraction from Faces …
I don’t have the time nor the expertise to read everything to understand how they take into account the bias that good looking white men with educated parents are way more likely to succeed at life.
i admittedly did not read the entire 61 pages but i read enough to answer this:
spoiler
they don’t
- Comment on The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing" 2 months ago:
Plastic surgery would become more popular.
One of the paper’s authors had the same thought:
“Suppose this type of technology gets used in labor market screening, or maybe dating markets,” Shue muses. “Going forward, you could imagine a reaction in which people then start modifying their pictures to look a certain way. Or they could modify their actual faces through cosmetic procedures.”
She also bizarrely claims
“we are very much not advocating that this technology be used by firms as part of their hiring process.”
and yet, for some reason:
The next step for Shue and her colleagues is to explore whether certain personality types are drawn to specific industries or whether those personality types are more likely to succeed within given industries.
- The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"lemmy.ml ↗Submitted 2 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 117 comments
- Comment on What's the main device to hammer in a nail? 2 months ago:
