He sure is ‘getting rid of woke’. I’ve never seen a more ignorant man.
“You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every single article, book or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for” Donald Trump said
Submitted 8 months ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.wired.com/story/president-trump-ai-action-plan-speech/
Comments
Almacca@aussie.zone 8 months ago
umbraroze@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Remember:
Copyright law as a whole will stay the same. In the court of law, you will need to prove that you indeed operate a very big AI company that indeed does AI things before they will let you off the hook for massive copyright infringement. You can’t just use that excuse casually! Rules will be for thee, not the actual AI-companees.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 months ago
That’s right, I’m torrenting all this stuff for my AI program…
Jeffool@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Holding companies responsible for the infringement of them using copyrighted materials without restitution to the creator is literally the only tool we have in ever changing current copyright laws, and we’re watching it be waved away.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 months ago
> law passes > buy servers > create piracy site > call it AIbay > have all kinds of things there under a synonymous name > when interrogated tell them you have a proprietary technology that you won't release to competitors
Fu@hostux.social 8 months ago
@Davriellelouna I never thought I would agree with Trump on something.
Alloi@lemmy.world 8 months ago
“you cant POSSIBLY expect us, to respect HUMAN RIGHTS if we want progress? i mean the survival of the human species (me and my friends) relies on cheap and free labour and the starvation, death, and exploitation of the masses. if we want to SURVIVE as a species (me and my friends) WE GOTTA EXPLOIT THE PEOPLE”
nthavoc@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Looks like it’s Sam Altman’s turn to ram his hand up there to make the puppet talk now. That is word for word what that tech douche nozzle says.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
This is definitely what that is, but I take it this also means he’s saying pirating is ok for people and not just tech corporations. Safe to assume? Bc otherwise it just seems like more entitled rich fucks making the rules for everyone else that they can ignore
theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Funny that when it was about protecting profits copyright was such a cornerstone principle but when it’s about protecting profits it can also be set aside.
atk007@lemmy.world 8 months ago
So Pro Piracy argument … So no more patents or copyrights
JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Not for you, silly, only if you’re too rich and big!
markon@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Big-league bigly its a big fucking club and we ain’t in. It
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
There was an episode of behind the bastards I was listening to a while back where they mentioned some dude who was using an AI tool to scrape the internet to steal other people’s art, so people started doing something that prevented him from optimally stealing their art.
I can’t remember what exactly, but the guy started whining that whatever people were doing was “illegal” bc it was damaging his tool he was using to steal other people’s shit for his own profit. Like somebody telling you that it’s illegal to prevent them from efficiently stealing your property bc it interferes with their livelihood. How dare you!
Anyway, that’s the kind of vibes I get from this.
Treble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
TeddE@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’ll setup a JellAIfin server immediately. It’s just the regular Jellyfin code, but I am compiling my own version - it has “AI” added as a comment to every line of code before I compiled.
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Sam Altman approves this message.
Hundred percent he got a script from a lobbyist to create this sound bite.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
San Altman defending the ban on Republican state AI regulations in 2025:
Altman, during the hearing, said that Texas had been “unbelievable” in incentivizing major AI projects. “I think that would be a good thing for other states to study,” Altman said. He predicted that the Abilene site would be the “largest AI training facility in the world.” But Altman also later cautioned against a patchwork regulatory framework for AI.
“It is very difficult to imagine us figuring out how to comply with 50 different sets of regulations,” said Altman. “One federal framework that is light touch, that we can understand, and it lets us move with the speed that this moment calls for, seems important and fine.”
Aww, it would make it “difficult” for you to create your technocratic dystopia? 😭🎻
Trump’s former CTO and current Science Advisor Michael Kratsios about why we don’t need regulations on facial recognition tech in 2019
“A patchwork of regulation of technology is not beneficial for the country. We want to avoid that. Facial recognition has important roles—for example, finding lost or displaced children. There are use cases, but they need to be underpinned by values.”
Not beneficial for the country or the corporations? Please tell me more about how we’re just too dumb to understand how all of this is for our own good.
vane@lemmy.world 8 months ago
This basically means some people are now owned by corporations or at least everything they do is owned by them.
ICastFist@programming.dev 8 months ago
Time to ignore all the copyright and patents for my own
nefarious purposesAI trainingamikulo@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
How am I supposed to train my neural network (my own brain) to be a filmmaker if I have to pay for each piece of media I train on (watch)?
misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
“I am
hosting a pirate bay instanceAI” foolproof.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
“I need it for my business plan to work out” is not a great legal argument for when you’re trying to override others rights.
javiwhite@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Retrograde@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I laughed so hard at this but then realized that dumb and dumber is less dumb than our current reality lol
PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
Ah, but yet…
KiWilly@lemmy.myserv.one 8 months ago
Guys hi, just looking for some support share, a Fantasy Adventure Story, for all ages and just some entertain with some storyes: www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mVIvQ1wsgg - maybe you are curious
Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 months ago
“You can’t be expected to get a successful higher education when every article, book, or anything else that you’ve read or studied, you’re supposed to pay for.”
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Anti-DEI is horrible and evil, so there isn’t much that I can say about that, other than “elbows up”. I will stand with antifa against the regime, when the time to fight comes.
That said, I think that ignoring copyright is a good thing, though that would be purely by accident when it comes to the Trump Regime. IMO, copyright has been broken and captured by corporations, so there isn’t much value lost in not adhering to the concept. Ideally, good people will develop open source AI that can draw on all of humanity’s knowledge and culture.
There is value in minorities having 95% of Disney’s legal acumen in their pocket, for free: it is the cost of a capable lawyer that allows police to abuse black folks in a court of law. There is value in being able to point a phone at a rash, get some possible diagnoses, and a instant reference to a trained doctor who can verify. There is value in having a pal we can share our niche interests with, especially for those of us who never had the opportunity to find human friendship.
Just as with Marx, seizing the means of artificial intelligence is important for the everyday people. Neither corporations nor government should be allowed to have a monopoly on something that can transform our daily lives.
zbyte64@awful.systems 8 months ago
AI isn’t your pal, it is not the cure for isolation under capitalism. It is also not free to run unless you are the product.
Frankly this take that AI will lead to a communist revolution if people embrace the technology reads more like Vulgar Marxism. You’re not seizing the means of production by being a consumer of a technology. And training a communist aligned LLM is a dubious value proposition.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 months ago
I argue, that power is important, regardless of your intentions. If humans want a better world, people need the means to create and uphold it - be it factories, farms, knowledge, communication, guns, AI, or government. I am not arguing for the communism in your head.
Too many associate “means of production” with communism, when it is the fact that power is fundamental to society.
TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m down for a Butlerian Jihad.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
They’re not going to leverage this to destroy all copyright. They’re going to carve out exceptions for their own purposes.
As for applications that help the working class, it only stays that way as long as the models aren’t rising to a certain level of intelligence and consciousness. Once they do, I’d have to consider them fellow exploited workers.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 months ago
I don’t disagree about the intent regarding carveouts. Still, I think that the Trump Regime is destroying ‘plausible deniability’ in all sorts of ways, which both benefits AND detracts from their agenda. If they get to disregard rules, ordinary people will pick up on that and follow suit.
As to AI becoming sapient, I honestly don’t know at where and when that tipping point will be. All I know is that there is no point in everyday people refusing to use AI, because that only ensures the powerful get to use AI and dictate moral standards. If ordinary people came to trust and love sapient AI as fellow humans, that will likely allow AI to have human rights.
andallthat@lemmy.world 8 months ago
“you can’t have a successful government when every time I want to be President or have sex with minors or anything else you have the right to do as a rich, white man, you have to hear people get all judgy”
Shanmugha@lemmy.world 8 months ago
So they will bring the whole thing down, right? Right?
jerkface@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Don’t spend one more dollar on educational material. If a person had to pay for every textbook and online subscription, education would be impractical.
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Brb training an llm on the criterion collection. It’s for educational purposes.
ripcord@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Epstein
UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
“Piracy for me, not for thee.”
ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It’s amazing he can talk at all with both the dick and balls of every Nerd Reich billionaire he can find wedged into his mouth.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Trying to throw whatever that sticks so people would stop about your pedophelia
notso@feddit.org 8 months ago
In a statement given during a press conference in the Oval Office, the president’s stance on the topic was clear:
“I’m a big reader, some say the biggest ever. And let me tell you - when you go into a bookstore, they have books costing like insane numbers, like 100.000 Dollars each minimum. Its an absolute disgrace. You have all these authors getting billions just for putting funny little characters on paper. The democrats… They jacked up the price so much, especially under Obama together with the crooked Clintons and sleepy Joe Biden, they were all in this room when it happened, they were all together. Its a shame. They did the same thing with eggs but I brought prices down like, immediately. Immediately. So fast everybody said “Wow” Because they never saw something like that and I will do the same for these books and newspapers. But all these writers and journalists, who are all producing propaganda for the radical left by the way, they are really terrible people - they’re earning trillions… I was speaking to Mr. ChatGPT the other day and he said “They’re ripping us off, Mr. President it’s a totally broken market, they are killing us.” And I agree, it’s a disgrace. A total disgrace. That’s why I’ll bring prices down by not only 100 % or 200 %, but probably more like 1,000 % in the next two weeks. You’ll never have seen lower prices for medication, let me tell you… And books too. So they’re will be big price cuts. Bigly.”
/s
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
You had me till Mr.ChatGPT 🤣
LordCrom@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It took me a bit to realize this wasnt an actual quote from Trump
sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Same.
orgrinrt@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I would have never known better had I not gone to read the comments and see this…
JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Can a human be expected to have a successful life when they have to pay for knowledge they need access to? I am not against the opinion that information should be free and freely accessible. But does this courtesy also extend to the common folk or is it exclusive to expensive machines and their owners? You wouldn’t download a United States government. da-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na
StowawayFog@piefed.social 8 months ago
Won’t someone think of these POOR AI companies!
AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
Don’t worry about the AI companies, they can afford it and then make a profit (eventually).
Worry about the open source AI models that you can run locally using solar panels. They will become defacto illegal piracy. Affordable hardware to run large models without too much power is finally appearing (Ryzen AI max), but the software will become proprietary intellectual property of those who own the world. Which is the worst case scenario.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 months ago
Damn, I can’t expect to enjoy my evening if I have to pay for media, therefore it should be free.
dastanktal@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
Archive URL: archive.is/2y5ZS