When I tried it in the past, I kinda didn’t take it seriously because everything was confined to its instance, but now, there’s full-featured global search and proper federation everywhere? Wow, I thought I heard there were some technical obstacles making it very unlikely, but now it’s just there and works great! I asked ChatGPT and it says this feature was added 5 years ago! Really? I’m not sure how I didn’t notice this sooner. Was it really there for so long? With flairs showing original instance where video comes from and everything?
I asked chat gpt
Lol
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Why do people bring this up every fucking time?
x00z@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Because they know it’s not accurate and explicitly mention it so you know where this information comes from.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Then why post it at all?
BullCrapDetekta33@lemmings.world 1 day ago
Image
“I used chatgpt”
sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 days ago
People also say they googled, unfortunately
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Not the same thing.
google allows for the possibility that the user was able to think critically about sources that a search returned
chapGPT is drunk uncle confidently stating a thing they heard third hand from Janet in accounting and then taking him at his word
thedruid@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Because people are dumber than chatgpt.
It also proves we don’t have a 50/50 split in intelligence. We need to look at the mean, then we’ll see most people are just plain fucking dumb
hisao@ani.social 2 days ago
Also, lazier. I’m more likely to stick with information from the first 1-3 search results I decided to click, while AI will parse and summarize dozens in fraction of time I spend reading just one.
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Honest answer? It’s easy and it won’t judge you for asking stupid questions.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Search engines and Wikipedia don’t judge you for asking stupid questions either.
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 days ago
No it’ll just hallucinate shit that’ll make you look dumb when you go and state it as fact.
Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 day ago
I asked Gemini, and my browser crashed, so, idk, man I guess it’s knowledge too powerful for human minds to contain.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 2 days ago
what do you mean? it’s like being angry that people bring up I googled something
Slotos@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Googling at least until fairly recently meant „I consulted an index of Internet”. It is a means to get to the bit of information.
Asking ChatGPT is like asking a well-behaved parrot in the library and believing every word it says instead of reading the actual book the librarian would point you towards.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 days ago
google: I checked the listing of news sites to find out information about a world event directly from professionals who double check their sources
chatGPT: I asked my hairstylist their uninformed opinion on a world event based on overheard conversations
I mean a moron could find the wrong information from google and your hairstylist could get lucky and be right, but odds are one source provides the opportunity for reliable results and the other is random and has a massive shit ton of downsides.
grue@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Looking up a list of resources that you then evaluate yourself is very categorically different from getting an “answer” from a bot.
Affidavit@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I think it’s because it causes all of Lemmy to have a collective ragegasm. It’s kind of funny in a trollish way. I support OP in this endeavour.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Even the small local AI niche hates ChatGPT, heh.
neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
How works you phrase this differently?
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 day ago
“It looks like this feature was added 5 years ago.”
If asking for confirmation, just ask for confirmation.
viking@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Apparently the feature was added 5 years ago.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
This is the golden age of misinformation and you are bitching about citations?