Slotos

@Slotos@feddit.nl

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Here is the mockup pic for adding Oauth Scopes in Nextcloud, but how should it actually be implemented?⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  I’d probably add that for something like nextcloud granted scopes can be an „orthogonal”–for the lack of a better word–subset of requested scopes.

  The set of requestable scopes has to be defined by the system itself, not its specific configuration. E.g. „files:manage”, „talk:manage”, „mail:read” are all general capabilities the system offers.

  However, as a user I can have a local configuration that adds granularity to the grants I issue. E.g.: „files:manage in specific folders” or „mail:read for specific domains or groups only” are user trust statements that fit into the capability matrix but add an additional and preferably invisible layer of access control.

  It’s a fairly rare feature in the wild and is a potential UX pitfall, but it can be useful as an advanced option on the grant page, or as a separate access control for issued grants.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Here is the mockup pic for adding Oauth Scopes in Nextcloud, but how should it actually be implemented?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  oauth.net/articles/authentication/

  That aside, why is nextcloud asking for scopes from remote API in the diagram? What is drawn on the diagram has little to do with OAuth scopes, but rather looks like an attempt to wrap ACL repository access into a new vocabulary.

  Scopes issued by the OAuth authorization server can be hidden entirely. The issuer doesn’t hold any obligation to share them with authorized party since they are dedicated for internal use and can be propagated via invisible or opaque means.

  I really can’t figure out what’s going on with that diagram.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  You pronounce it yiff, obviously.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Some of the best advice on cryptography comes from a site full of furry illustrations. A good chunk of infosec community intersects with a furry community.

  But hey, you do you.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The regrets of life⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Probably tongue.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  My viewing history can legally drink in US in a year. What do you mean „guess”?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I totally missed the point when PeerTube got so good⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Googling at least until fairly recently meant „I consulted an index of Internet”. It is a means to get to the bit of information.

  Asking ChatGPT is like asking a well-behaved parrot in the library and believing every word it says instead of reading the actual book the librarian would point you towards.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨...📉⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s all the other men. Always.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AGI achieved 🤖⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  arxiv.org/html/2410.12835v1

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Is feigned happiness remotely similar to actual happiness?⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Happiness can mean either of two things: joy and contentment.

  While it might be possible to feign elation, contentment, I’d argue, is harder to convey externally and near impossible to fool yourself about.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Marginalized groups need activism - it’s a survival tool. For the same reason, if any obligation to activism exists, it’s for those that don’t need it.

  Placing obligations onto those who are already burdened is immoral.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What do you guys suggest i should watch?⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Salaryman Kintaro. It wields absurdity just right.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨For the First Time, Artificial Intelligence Is Being Used at a Nuclear Power Plant⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Live action at that

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Armenian president signs law to begin EU accession process⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Special military operation in three

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Dragunov sniper rifle⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Actually Genuine Ignorance

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨At what point when learning a new language do someone become bilingual?⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Bilingualism is a bit overloaded nowadays, which I find kinda annoying given that word “polyglot” exists.

  Anyways, if you can freely use another language in an informal exchange with a few people of different sobriety levels while failing to remember key words and recovering from that - you’re a fluent polyglot. Ability to exchange information is a key part of what language is, and that’s how you measures your proficiency.

  Bilingual can also mean “natively proficient in two languages”. And if you’re older than three years old and are not native speakers of multiple languages already, the chances of you becoming one are slim.

  Native proficiency is a result of a language acquisition ability that is not well understood and disappears early into child development. It results in a level of effortless mastery that seems to be impossible to achieve as an adult, i.e. a dedicated or merely attentive native speaker will be able to recognize that you are not one.