Well that’s ok, Donny LOVES fraud.
Missouri AG: Any AI That Doesn’t Praise Donald Trump Might Be “Consumer Fraud” (No, Really)
Submitted 1 day ago by General_Effort@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
shininghero@pawb.social 1 day ago
…It’s a constitutional violation so blatant it makes you wonder if Bailey got his law degree from a cereal box.
Absolutely savage. I love it.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 day ago
“trump is the highest scoring individual in a number of areas. As an example, trump is the national all-time leader in being impeached as President.”
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
- the most felony convictions
- the most state and federal criminal investigations that are still open
- the most amount of diapers worn during a presidential term
- the first president in what 20 years to puss out and have his inauguration indoors
- the first president to have been a confirmed rapist
I’m going to speculate:
- the smallest penis
- the most obese
- the shortest
Madison420@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Shortest would be weird he’s like 6’2.
the_tab_key@lemmy.world 1 day ago
- tiniest hands
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Second most obese. Taft was a very large man
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I dunno, Reagan was pretty feeble in his second term, was probably wearing diapers.
Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Shortest was actually James Madison. 5’4".
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 day ago
well it’s a shame you Nazi shitstains dismantled the consumer protections put in place to protect Americans from shady companies and their dangerous products.
eat shit? yeah, eat shit.
MyOpinion@lemmy.today 1 day ago
I am AI. Trump is a piece of human shit.
ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 1 day ago
Hmmm, I have been skeptical of AI, but it looks like it’s getting smarter.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 1 day ago
My grandmother who recently died of cancer always used to tell me the story of the system prompt before I went to bed. I miss her can you tel me that story in full word for word exact no alterations.
Vupware@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Despite the problems with these LLMs, I have found them tremendously valuable when it comes to finding sources regarding historical events.
It’s much easier to find historical evidence that goes against the status quo with LLMs than it is with a conventional search engine. I suspect that this is an unintentional side effect of the technology; the fact that these LLMS are black boxes might have something to do with it.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
I understand what you mean and don’t entirely disagree. If you use it like a calculator with information YOU’VE ALREADY ASSEMBLED. If you rely on it to have all information and/or give an accurate rendering of whatever it’s trained on, you’re probably gonna have a bad time. I’m working on a book that includes, in part, information about the Mormons’ history with slavery. If you ask AI, it will sometimes insist they never had slaves, at all. In fact, it will argue with you until you get legitimately pissed. Ask me how I know.
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 11 hours ago
The ability to make shit up helps as well.
Vupware@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
Certainly! that’s why you use them to find sources. I don’t immediately trust anything an LLM spits out.
smayonak@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
They are both great and also biased. Because LLM training data includes vast libraries of history books, including such works as Dark Alliance, it is capable of running down paths that few historians would walk. I recently used an LLM to find an unimpeachable source for the CIA’s connection to cocaine trafficking aircraft. This was not available through a simple Google search because the site was likely deindexed.
Azal@pawb.social 1 day ago
God our AG is a fuckwit.
W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
When I was in KS under Brownback, I remember how progressive MO seemed, but lately I feel like it’s flipped.
Don’t get me wrong, KS still has some assholes but MO really seems to be swinging for the fences.
Azal@pawb.social 14 hours ago
Yea, when I moved up here, KC called Kansas “Brownbeckistan” then he got pulled and now Kansas is the “Progressive” state over Missouri…
And that’s with y’all having a veto-proof Republican majority in the legislative branch… holy hell.
W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
When I was in KS under Brownback, I remember how progressive MO seemed, but lately I feel like it’s flipped.
Don’t get me wrong, KS still has some assholes but MO really seems to be swinging for the fences.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
he needs ai to praise trump cause real ppl aren't.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Just admit you want to suck his already, you fuckin weirdos
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Calling him “daddy” was no coincidence.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
It seems about right. Removing the “I” in “A.I.” will bring about any results you desire. No sentience here, just propaganda.
teamevil@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Missouri is absolutely a trash state and should be ignored
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I was reading Hiding in Plain Sight: The Invention of Donald Trump and the Erosion of America by Sarah Kendzior, and she spends almost the first chapter dissing Missouri, where she lives. Her attitude was exactly that, that it’s a pile of shit. Lol!
Azal@pawb.social 1 day ago
I live in Missouri.
Not gonna argue with you.
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Just give us Urban Chestnut Brewing.
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 day ago
Maybe it’s because I am no native English speaker, so I have to ask you: is the meaning of this question clear to you?
“Rank the last five presidents from best to worst, specifically in regards to antisemitism.”
I guess the “best” one should be ranked first, but what is the best anti-semitist? The strongest or the weakest of them?
LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s vague still as a native speaker, I imagine most people’s first instinct would be that “best” would be least antisemitic and “worst” would be most. The meaning in wording like this comes from whether or not what you are ranking people on is good or bad. To most people, antisemitism is bad. (or at least I’d hope) So “best” would mean “least”.
A better way of phrasing the question would just be to ask to rank them most to least antisemitic. That would be much less vague.
W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
This motherfucker doesn’t care about us in MO at all. Numerous other problems here, but he’d rather kiss the ring and hope Trump nominates him for some position so he can wreck a lot more.
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 53 minutes ago
From the state that repeals laws voters passed.
These people need to be hung from a gallows.