Schools and lawmakers are grappling with how to address a new form of peer-on-peer image-based sexual abuse that disproportionately targets girls.
For example, Louisiana mandates a minimum five-year jail sentence no matter the age of the perpetrator.
That’s just on it’s face stupid. A thirteen year old boy is absolutely gonna wanna see girls in his age group naked. That’s not pedophilia. It’s wanting to see the girls he fantasizes about at school every day. Source: I was a thirteen year old boy.
It shouldn’t be treated the same as when an adult man generates it; there should be nuance. I’m not saying it’s ok for a thirteen year old to generate said content: I’m saying tailor the punishment to fit the reality of the differences in motivations. Leave it to Louisiana to once again use a cudgel rather than sense.
I’m so glad I went through puberty at a time when this kind of shit wasn’t available. The thirteen year old version of me would absolutely have got myself in a lot of trouble. And depending on what state I was in, seventeen year old me could have ended listed as a sex predetor for sending dick pics to my gf cause I produced child pornography. God, some states have stupid laws.
dinckelman@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Just a reminder that the government is actively voting against regulations on AI, because obviously a lot of these people are pocketing lobbyist money
Jax@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
Oh I just assumed that every Conservative jerks off to kids
Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
Get some receipts and that will be a start.
shalafi@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
A 99-1 vote to drop the anti AI regulation is hardly the government voting against. The Senate smashed that shit hard and fast.
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Can’t expect people to know about that 99-1 vote cuz it wasn’t made into a meme.
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 20 hours ago
Even in countries a lot less corrupt than the US this is an issue.
Especially because the US government/companies doesn’t do jack shit for people
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours ago
In the case of US govt, the AI part of the bill they voted against was the part that blocked regulations on AI for a period of 10 years.
In case that wasn’t clear, the US govt voted in favor of regulating AI. 99-1.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 17 hours ago
They want to be regulated so they can finally have their mote. Cutting out the states’ power does mean they will only have to buy one group of politicians in Washington and those are some relatively cheap Hoes