Adderbox76
@Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
“Free as in Freedom” doesn’t mean “Free as in Beer”.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with a paid service using FOSS software if that’s the route they want to take. Using FOSS doesn’t mean you have to rely on donations only.
There’s a pervasive, damaging, and limiting misunderstanding about the word “Free” that has always been a problem in the Open Source world. This notion that things that are Open Source should be “No Cost” just because the source code is readily available and anyone could technically spin their own fork of it if they had the ability to do so.
But NO WHERE does it actually say that FREE means “Free as in Beer”.
If you don’t like it and don’t want to sign up, more power to you. That’s your freedom of choice. And to be honest, an instance asking for a fee probably wouldn’t be very successful.
But pretending that there is something either shady or legally or morally wrong with asking for a fee for using FOSS software is harmful to the very notion of FOSS and the upvote ratio you’re getting is a shameful example of how pervasive the whole “But GIMP/INKSCAPE/BLENDER is supposed to be free!” whining has become from users who have no clue what the FREE ifnFREE and OPEN SOURCE actually mean.
- Comment on Google Gemini is coming for your private apps. Here's how to stop it 2 weeks ago:
My previous Motorola also has an e/OS/ spin. But sadly my current one does not.
- Comment on Google Gemini is coming for your private apps. Here's how to stop it 2 weeks ago:
Any Google app that would have Gemini baked in has long since been disabled on my phone. I’m presuming it’s bullshit isn’t going to be able to access my Fossify Messages or Dialer or Gallery or every other app I’ve replaced and disabled, especially since I’ve also disabled the Assistant and Google Apps.
(If I’m wrong please correct me.)
- Comment on Kids are making deepfakes of each other, and laws aren’t keeping up 3 weeks ago:
Sure. That might end up being a socially healthy place for adults to end up.
But it will never work that way for young teens. Their brains aren’t done baking yet. They don’t have the emotional maturity to understand that enough to be “okay with it because it’s just a fake”.
That’s why we protect kids rather than just telling them “hey it’s okay…it’s only a fake.”
- Comment on Kids are making deepfakes of each other, and laws aren’t keeping up 3 weeks ago:
I’m not even going to begin describing all the ways that what you just said is fucked up.
I’ll just point out that online deepfake technology is FAR more accessible to the average 13 year old to use on their peers than “porno mags” were in our day.
You want to compare taking your 13 year old classmates photo off of Facebook, running it through an AI and in five seconds creating photo-realistic adult content featuring them, and compare that to getting your dad’s skin-mag from under his mattress when he’s not home, cutting your classmates face out of a yearbook, taping it on, then sneaking THAT into the computer lab at school so that you can photocopy it and pass it around in home room, and then putting the skin-mag BACK under the mattress before your dad finds out.
Is that right…is THAT what you’re trying to say? Are those the two things that you’re trying say are equivalent?
- Comment on Big Tech CEOs Spent Millions to Influence Trump and Republican Lawmakers, Attempting to Secure Billions in Tax Handouts Paid For By Ripping Health Care, Food From Families 3 weeks ago:
When a stock price is all that matters, everything gets reduced to line items on a spreadsheet. That includes humanity.
- Comment on You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning 4 weeks ago:
I just use Syncthing. No cloud, just keeps any folders I choose on any devices synced with one another. Never had a problem, and while the files yes accessible on the internet technically, they’re not stored anywhere except the devices that have access to them. Works like a charm.
- Comment on You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning 4 weeks ago:
I usually move to Lineage once my two year warranty is up, just in case.
I know that by law hardware manufacturers can’t deny hardware warranty based on your software (at least where I’m from…I worked in for one of the big three telco’s up here in Canada)
But I’d rather not have that argument with the manufacturer, so I wait for it to run out. If my phone has a rom available I run that until the hardware dies and then I upgrade.
- Comment on You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning 4 weeks ago:
In the absence of being able to switch to Graphene (Don’t own a pixel), I’ve done everything I can to replace Google Apps with FOSS alternatives, and disabled Google Assistant on my device entirely.
I know none of that will stop a determined Google eventually fucking with me, but at least I’m trying.
I’m so damned tired of the modern corporate world.
- Comment on What's the best way to respond to someone who says "transracial is just as valid as transgender"? 5 weeks ago:
Transracial doesn’t exist because “Race” in the context that they want to use it doesn’t exist.
Genetically there’s only one “race”; that’s the human race. If they want to identify as a different culture, it’s purely a cosmetic cultural thing, not biological or genetic. Whereas as being Transgender is biological. Therefore, you can safely tell people like Rachel Dolezal to fuck off and go back to fifth period science class.
- Comment on The Arc Browser Is Dead 1 month ago:
Most regular people just use what came with their computer, unfortunately.
So this is a case of a company that made a browser to appeal to techies that didn’t see widespread adoption, is pivoting to a new browser that is focused on the central conceit of a product that most techies decry…
Read the room, Arc. Read the room.
- Comment on Why is it ok to replace -ed at the end of a word with -t in some cases? For example, why are "vexed" and "vext" both acceptable, but "thrilled" and "thrilt" aren't? 1 month ago:
They’re not acceptable. In fact I can’t think of a single one except burnt that is still actively kicking around.
Who told you it was acceptable, if you don’t mind me asking. And if it was your english teacher, please ask them how they managed to get here from all the way back in Shakespeare’s time.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Past 30, age is less about biology and more sociology.
I’m a 49 year old male. But I’m divorced, no kids. Still living a bachelor life quite happily while most guys close to my age are married with the kids and coaching soccer on weekends in a minivan. As a result, my friend group almost exclusively skews younger because those are the people who are in the same stage of life as I am (regardless of biological age).
The same works for relationships. Past a certain point it doesn’t matter how old you are, as long as your sociological age is compatible. (Ie. Your way of life)
- Comment on Bachelor Chow slabs, anyone? 1 month ago:
Well yeah…that’s the “love” part. It would be false advertising if they took Jeremy away but still insisted it contained love.
- Comment on Bachelor Chow slabs, anyone? 1 month ago:
Listen, the Waukegan Township homeless problem isn’t going to solve itself, you know…
- Comment on Do you think a story that mixes magic with super advanced technology can work? 1 month ago:
I apologize if this sounds flippant, but it’s FICTION.
Literally ANYTHING works if its written well enough…
- Comment on Why do so many piece of Hardware come with windows only software requiring admin right for installation 2 months ago:
Why are corporate IT policies the way they are?
I thought about this the other day when asking my IT department why they won’t let me carry a USB stick between home and work to be able to work from home and instead lock down the USB access and instruct me to use Google Drive instead…
I decided that most corporations only cosplay their IT security inasmuch as it only matters up to and not beyond the point of economic convenience.
If any of these companies truly cared about security, they would at the very least be using a hardened fork of Chrome with Google Services stripped out. They’d be self-hosting their own servers connected only via a VPN or some sort.
But that shit takes money and staff to maintain it. So they’ll give everything to third parties to manage instead and then send out pop-quiz emails about phishing every couple of weeks followed by sternly worded emails when a person fails it.
(Sorry…off my anti-depressants until pay day, so I have a lot of micro rants that have built up…haha)
- Comment on Does the average person know markdown? 2 months ago:
Most IT nowadays is just simply the ability to google. What sets a professional IT person apart from an amateur is that the professional has an educated guess as to what to google in the first place.
Non-professional: “My computer is making a weird buzzing noise”
Professional: “What are the symptoms of a bad cooling fan?”
- Comment on Does the average person know markdown? 2 months ago:
##What
###You talkin’ about
####Willis?
- Comment on Does the average person know markdown? 2 months ago:
I guess they commonly know to use asterisks for italics and bold
I wouldn’t guess that at all. Pretty much everyone I know in the “normie” world would AT BEST use ctrl-i and ctrl-b if they’re not just pressing the icon in the gui.
Hell, most of them look at me like I’m a goddamn morlock when I tell them to Shift-delete in order to skip the recycling bin.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
For the most part, yes. By design. Conveying something in a movie is more challenging in that it has less time to do it than a book has less time to do it. So it HAS to be, to some degree, more blunt and on-the-nose than a book can take its time being.
You can write five pages of internal description discussing what your main character thinks about the world around them. But you can’t show that in a movie and so you have to figure out how to get the gist of it across in a few lines of dialogue and some emoting.
It’s why show don’t tell is a rule. You have to simplify a movie in comparison to a book or else your audience will be sitting through a ten hour film.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
The very first thing written by a something called “proofreading services.com” is functionally wrong. That’s a helluva start.
“exact” and “very accurate” are not the same thing. Not by a long shot.
“Very accurate” still leaves room for innacuracies while “Exact” does not. So why exactly would I trust a service whose very first sentence is an error?
- Comment on Why do they call it a corn maze and not a maize maze? 2 months ago:
For that matter, why is it called “getting corn-holed” instead of “getting maize-holed”
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Can I be the guy that’s known around town for pointing out that in the given context, it’s actually “fewer users”
And yeah yeah, I know about evolution of language and common usage, and all that crap. But it really does just boil down to the fact that fewer sounds more elegant when the object is plural. ie: “There are usually fewer unexpected costs associated with new home ownership”, vs “There is usually less unexpected cost associated with new home ownership” (Both are correct in their given context)
It’s about how language rolls off the tongue. If we lose that we might as well grunt at each other draw pictographs with our own feces.
/end of rant.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
I miss the prevalence of manual transmissions. Every one of my old first beater cars were manuals. But it seems that they’ve been phased out for the most part and it sucks. Driving Automatics isn’t really driving (I’ll die on that hill).
- Comment on Why is coal and fossil fuels still used? 2 months ago:
100% agree. I was just pointing out that the whole situation is not as black and white as people on both sides want it to be.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
I feel like that’s sarcasm? But yes, I legitimately feel that our system, where the only person who has any “theoretical” power to make unilateral decisions without parliament is some old guy who is content to just stay out of it, is better.
Imagine an America where they could tell Trump. “Okay, you’re king. Here…we’ll even put you on our money. Now go live overseas and fuck off”
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Because, and not to sound flippant, that’s just the easiest and most natural way to do it without a lot of extra paperwork.
See technically, a "president* is meant as a drop in replacement for a monarch. A republic doesn’t get rid if its king, they just replace one who was born into it with one they chose and one they pretend to have a bit more control over.
Canada’s equivalent to Trump isn’t Carney, technically it’s King Charles. And the U.S equivalent to Prime Minister would be who’ve leads the majority party in congress.
Could we go through the constitutional rigamarole to change that? Sure. But why bother when he’s content to stay out of things.
Essentially, a parliamentary democracy means that our “Trump” is a deadbeat dad who lives in another country.
I’ll happily keep that buffer in place versus whatever the fuck the U.S had gotten themselves into.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Republics give you Trump…
What I mean is this:
A Prime Minister is not a president. They are simply the leader of whichever party has he most seats in parliament and its therefore the “face” of the government in many days.
Most importantly this means that there is no such thing as “executive orders” because there us no “executive” branch, per we. Meaning even if we (Canada) had fucked up and elected Trump-lite, Pollieve, his ability to do the same shit Trump or doing would be severely limited in that everything goes through parliamentary vote without exception (for the most part).
A ruling party has something called the Emergencies Act, as that can, to a limited degree, allow them to enact a few things without parliamentary vote, but its use is generally highly controversial and is still very controlled by judicial review.
Long story short (too late, I know) is that the tsunami of bullshit that Orange Hitler is doing is because he’s using executive orders enact things and then fighting congress in court when they push back rather than getting congressional approval BEFORE enacting it.
Something that is far more limited in a governmental system where that much power HASN’T been given to one person.
- Comment on Why is coal and fossil fuels still used? 2 months ago:
Oh believe me. I would be too. We’d buy ourselves a hell of a lot of time. I’m just pointing out that the solution is never black and white.