If civilization continues to the year 9999, is the idea to go to year 10.000, or...?

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨ALostInquirer@lemm.ee⁩ to ⁨nostupidquestions@lemmy.world⁩

It seems like it’d get increasingly impractical as the years go on to hundreds of thousands and millions of years to write them out that way, but then…I guess technically one may already do this with the preceding years, so future’s fair game for it?

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Narrrz@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
it's going to be hard to get to 40k if we don't keep counting through the 10s.

source
- SnoopBob@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  In lore, in warhammer humans count XXX.MYY.
  
  Like 005.M31 to 014.M31 for the Horus Heresy in the 31st millennium.
  
  I vote we switch up to that system. The counting, not the ~~heresy~~.
  
  source
  - Narrrz@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    coward
    
    source
julianh@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
People already abbreviate to the last two digits when appropriate, so it’s not hard to imagine people doing the same for bigger numbers.

For keeping track of stuff electronically, we’re pretty much set too. 64 bit unix time will take us well over 100 billion years.

source
- argh_another_username@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I was looking at some old pictures of my family and some of them had dates like 921 for 1921 in them. I used to abbreviate 88 for 1988, but I’ve never seen people using 3 digits like that.
  
  source
  - AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    During y2k, a third digit was one of the compromises for languages like Perl. There were so many places that only displayed a two digit year but rolling over to 00 would have made it difficult to sort or do date math, or even to convert to a four digit year. So the year rolled over from 99 to 100, so dates with two digit years could be sorted correctly. If you were only displaying two digits, it probably correctly displayed as 00. If you wanted to convert to four digit years,just add 1900
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Seraph@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Seeing as the current year is 12,023 I'm gonna say: Yes.

source
- cobysev@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  A fellow Kurzgesagt enthusiast, I see.
  
  source
Sabata11792@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Can't wait for the drama to patch Windows XP to survive y10k.

source
- AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I put in a lot of extra hours helping prevent y2k from being a disaster but I hope they’re not expecting me again for y10k
  
  source
  - Sabata11792@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    The chosen one. You will be frozen and revived thousands of years later to make sure we don't have to spend money to replace the label printer.
    
    source
  - kambusha@feddit.ch ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Hello AA5B, what’s happening? Ummm, I’m gonna need you to go ahead come in on Saturday. So if you could be here around 9 that would be great, mmmkay…
    
    Oh, and remember: next Friday… is Hawaiian shirt day. So, you know, if you want to, go ahead and wear a Hawaiian shirt and jeans.
    
    source
bhamlin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
A000 is next

source
- Scrollone@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Found the Excel fanboy
  
  source
  - FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    ? It’s hexadecimal
    
    source
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
There are a lot of things it depends on.

First is whether we are still using the same calendar base date. The currently accepted international system is based on Christendom, but there are other calendars out there with different dates. You could see a switch over if another group becomes more dominant. Or you could get another system implemented entirely; France tried to change its base year to the French Revolution.

Second is if Earth is the only human inhabited planet. We are already seeing that the Martian day throws a lot of coordination up in the air, and that is without having human bases there. It is possible that Mars develops its own calendar that better fits Martian time. At that point, the only link for calendars across humanity would be the Unix Epoch.

source
- miak@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  The Unix Epoch is obviously the correct base for any calendar.
  
  source
AmidFuror@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
They'll just go to A001, thus pushing back the problem for 26,000 more years.

source
- Thavron@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Thus ~~pushing back the problem for 26,000 more years.~~ solving the problem once and for all!!
  
  source
vodkasolution@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
A new robot Messiah will arrive in 8630 so our year 10000 aC will be their 1370 aR

source
- MolochAlter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  FYI, the abbreviation is AD for “anno domini”. Anno Christi would work too but it’s not the normal choice.
  
  Kudos for AR, would that be “Anno Roboticus”?
  
  source
  - vodkasolution@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I thought After Christ lol
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Or we are in the year 12023

source
SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Why would that be a problem? We already often only use the last two digits to refer to the year, that’ll probably not change.

source
dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I would hope that time and date formats would be redesigned by that point. If we would live to y10k, I’d expect a lot of space colonization. At that point, I’d expect there to be some other point of reference to define timestamps.

source
- DaleGribble88@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Agreed. Let’s get the conversation started on this. Personally, I’d like to use midnight of January 1st, 1970. That seems like a nice rational spot. The new time scale will just count the number of seconds since then. So, for example, this comment could be written at approximately 1699879376.
  
  source
  - dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I love it! That would be EPOCH!
    
    source
  - XeroxCool@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Show me the real excel fan boy
    
    [comment before with A0000]
    
    I said the real fan boy
    
    [DaleGribble88]
    
    Perfect
    
    Seriously though, I wonder if the other commenter just missed the mark
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
captainlezbian@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
There’s already a movement to call it the 10000s because that’s about how long ago we had the idea to have permanent settlements

source
- wolfshadowheart@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  It's how long archeology has said we have had permanent settlements.
  
  In reality it's likely far earlier than that, we only just found a settlement from 11,000 BCE in Turkey, Gobekli Tepe which was likely a sanctuary/shrine, as well as other towns in the surrounding area likely having started before even then.
  
  Big archeology pushed back to say that that's not 100% certain and that humans were still nomadic, despite all the evidence showing otherwise. It was finally just recognized officially a couple months ago.
  
  source
HowManyNimons@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
No I think time will just stop.

source
olsonexi@lemmy.wtf ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I don’t see why not. 5 digits isn’t too bad, and it wouldn’t be an issue for another 90,000 years after that. Besides, we’ll probably extinct ourselves through climate change, nuclear war, and/or AI long before then anyways.

source
joel_feila@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Y10k bug will end society

source
Genericusername@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
By then, I don’t think that the use of earth’s orbital period around the sun would make sense as a unit of measurement. It is important to track the seasons if you’re living in an agricultural society. But the orbital period of the earth is not consistent across time, nor the time it takes for the earth to rotate. It doesn’t make a good unit of measurement. And don’t get me started on leap years, leap seconds, negative leap seconds, timezones and daylight saving times…

I’d prefer to base the new unit of time based on “Plank time”. About 10^44 of these are about one second. Now if we switch to the duodecimal system we can define 12^41 × Plank time to be our standard unit. It’s about a third of an earth second. 144 of these (12^43) equal roughly 3/4 of a minute. 144 of these (12^45) is about 1.8 hours. 12 of these (12^46) could be the equivalent of a day, 12 of that could be an equivalent of a week, and you can find an equivalent for a year. The duodecimal is unnecessary, but it makes division a bit neater. Now peak a date well before the beginning of human history to avoid the need for negative years (BC / AD) and that’s it.

That way you get a single number that you can manipulate arithmetically. Not like yyyy/mm/dd format where each part is a different length.

source
- CoolMatt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  …what?
  
  source
Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Astronomers already use Julian Dates for various reasons. Right now it’s 2460261.2834606, it’ll be later by the time you read this. Julian dates/times are fractional days starting from January 1st, 4713 = 0. Just keep counting up from there.

source
- hansl@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  So I got confused and had to read Wikipedia for this. Day 0 is Jan 1, 4713 BC. I feel this causes more confusion if it isn’t mentioned.
  
  source
  - Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    How are you still not confused??
    
    So I just read through the same wiki and there is absolutely no explanation of why they start at 4713 BC. It’s just bizarrely stated as fact with no explanation. It would be like if invented a card game called Percluey where you had to count to 44 and Yell “Percluey” to win the game. And 8s are also called perclueys and worth -3. Then when you ask why it’s 44 you just say “because that’s Percluey” and then when they ask you what the heck is a “Percluey” you just shrug and sip on your spritzer.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    DOH, skipped those two critical letters! Thanks for the correction.
    
    source
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
What’s going to happen, is that I’m going to start a Humanist cult, and they’re going to name the new age after me.

They’ll call it “the year of our salvation.” They just misremember everything, and think I was some hero. The reality is I’m an asshole and should never be trusted leading a quasi-religious crusade.

source
- PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Yup, ducks are general assholes. And they rape a lot, which also tracks with the cult leaders. And they quack, too!
  
  source
HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Beyond maybe needing some sort of space calendar if we ever actually get off this rock in a way that matters, why not? An extra digit isnt all that big of a hassle.

source
- thefactremains@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  If we’re no longer on earth, days and years will be based on whatever orbit we’re following. So I guess the counter would start from zero.
  
  source
kzhe@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
We’ll probably have a Calendar system switch to a new major event

source
- Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  BC - Before Christ
  
  AD - After Christ (but in Latin)
  
  ADR - After Christ Returns
  
  source
  - olsonexi@lemmy.wtf ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    
    AD - After Christ (but in Latin)
    
    eh… not quite
    
    it actually stands for “Anno Domini”, which is latin, but means “in the year of the lord”
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
obviously start counting backwards to zero

source
cobwoms@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
we’re going to have a y2k but situation all over again. the y10k bug

source
- folkrav@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Ackchyually, the Y2K bug was pretty different. A lot of software, for various reasons, took to representing dates as a two digit number. This meant going from 1999 to 2000 would make that software try to understand dates going from 99 to potentially various of other values, like 00 or 100.
  
  We’re gonna have a different form of that on machines with 32 bit processors relatively soon. Past some time on Jan 19th, 2038, the epoch time, a count of seconds since Jan 1st, 1970, is stored as a 32 bit signed integer. At this time, it’ll run out of positive values, will overflow, and cause the internal clocks of such machines to go back to 1901. It probably won’t happen again after that, as the maximum date represented by the largest signed integer a 64 bit machine can store is 292+ billion years
  
  source
  - hydrashok@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Good luck to all the engineers billions of years from now having fun moving to 128-bit time. What fools we were.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Cosmicomical@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Shouldn't it go back to 1970? Why 1901?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I’m pretty sure all operating systems have long ago switched to 64 bit date times. Of course, just like y2k, it’s the apps and their shortcuts that will be a problem.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
According to Zager and Evans, the year 9595 will pretty much be it.

piped.video/watch?v=zKQfxi8V5FA

source
- CulturedLout@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Never thought I’d see that song as being optimistic
  
  source
TheInsane42@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Nah, we’ll never get there. (When we do, major Y10K crisis. 💣💥

source
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
We shkuld switch to a base12 number and metric system.

source
- geogle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  You’re thinking too small. Base 60 (Sexagesimal)…the Sumerians had the right idea.
  
  source
Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I’m sure we’ll switch to star dates by then.

source
marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Well, no reason not to add a digit after 9999.

But yeah, at some point we ought to stop using years. It’s the second that is standardized, and the year is all off. I can’t imagine we reaching 9999, but the change has no relation to the extra digit and no reason to happen anywhere near it.

source
Thalion@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Eventually we reach 999.M41

source
- SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  And stay there for decades until we need an excuse to sell bigger models
  
  source
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I don’t think anyone cares at this point, that’s a problem for 300ish generations from now.

source
- Jay@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I don’t think that’s a question any human will have to answer. Humanity will be long gone by then.
  
  source
Red_October@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
At that point we switch to a Year (three digit) and Millennium (M followed by two digits) system, so the year 10,001 would be noted as 001 M10. After 999 M10 we reach 000 M11, and so on. Most applications would only really need the year number.

source

-> View More Comments