Submitted 2 weeks ago by yermaw@sh.itjust.works to showerthoughts@lemmy.world
With high speed internet coming out at exactly the same time as my sex drive developed, I have probably seen more nude women than every human in my direct ancestry.
If not combined, I definitely have the high score for now.
We’ve seen more naked ladies, but touched less.
I only ever touched one naked lady. That was 16 years ago. I liked it so much, I never touched another one. She seemed to liked being touched by me too and never left.
Really hoping this isn’t a joke about your mom…
Especially if your grandparents were swingers.
I could have done without knowing that but there we are…
fewer
I hear an alarming large number of people can trace their ancestry back to Genghis Khan and I am not sure you have him beat. Maybe though
Oh i forgot about that guy. Its a closer match-up than i thought.
Also, mammals evolved around 300 million years ago, and being generous, clothes were first used 3 million years ago. So the number of generations of your ancestors who didn’t see tiddies everyday is a rounding error to the number who did. And they were ALL successful *vaguely waves in your direction*
I dunno, even assuming Ghengis had sex every day and his proclivities leaned toward having multiple concubines sent to him at one time, that still doesn’t necessarily equal the number of different people someone could cycle through during a session of flogging the bishop. Someone with a high libido could easily pass Khan these days.
But he could’ve organised orgies to increase daily nudes views, optimisation
Counterpoint: We used to exist without any clothing and saw naked ladies all the time. And naked dudes. And even gasp naked children.
Yes but also probably not a ton outside relatively small tribes so might still be low numbers
And then we put kids in dresses! Even the boys! Oh! The vapours! ⋆faints dramatically⋆
But did you see them IN PERSON? How good is your score now, uh?
I’m definitely tied for last place unless theres some blindness along the way…
Or some ultra-Christian middle age stuff against nudity even in the bedroom
I live in a naturist resort, (nudist colony) so I still win, probably.
Are we talking 400 different women or just 800 total boobs in different situations? This is an important distinction.
To be fair, any currently living but older relatives will have had the ability to access high speed internet for just as long as you, but also time with older forms of media as well.
In the yearbook of your bloodline after the entries for greatest warrior, wisest thinker, kindest soul and many others there will be you, top gooner.
A long unbroken line that dies in a million fruitless nuts.
I hope we dont have to meet everyone in the afterlife. Imagine how disappointed they’ll be.
Men too :smart:
I unfortunately watched porn too, and I regret every second I wasted watching porn. Supported sex trafficking without even knowing, and ruined my life with it.
Not proud of what I did, I am disgusted.
People don’t like to look at this dimension. They just like to talk about how seeking out porn is natural and normal for teens. I’ve seen a few people around Lemmy make this claim as an argument against doing anything about how we handle pornography in the modern world.
It’s about quality, noy quantity
We’re about to have some quality quantum-titties in the future.
Magritte would like a word
My body count is well over twenty, but nothing in the past eight years. I’m 60.
I’m not bragging, my number is pretty low compared to my contemporaries, even the women.
I do wonder about my virgin adult son, though. Not that I’d ever ask, it’s his business, not mine. Also, none of this matters at all. Not seeing pictures of nude women, not having sex. It’s just a nice aside to living life, not important.
I’m not bragging, my number is pretty low compared to my contemporaries, even the women.
I think that’s a very healthy number. I’m 53 and I had a very self-destructive first half (+) of my life. I stopped counting very deep into the triple digits and if you told me that I hit four digits, I would not be shocked. I have only been with two people I have loved or cared for and, in my opinion, that’s the only number that matters.
IMHO, our generation had a fucked up relationship with sex.
With high speed internet coming out at exactly the same time as my sex drive developed
What percentage of all the naked ladies publically posted on the internet do you think you’ve seen?
Probably close to 0%. Theres a fuckton
Yes but consider the children
It’s a good time to be alive.
well digital pix of them anyway
🤯
HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
By not having kids, you could cement your place as #1 titty seer of your bloodline
hansolo@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Turns out that there’s a curse on humanity that if you see more than 800 boobs in your life, your chromosomes self-destruct. But we’ve never had data to figure out all out.
HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
arin@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Down syndrome people would love this trick
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
800 boobs, even if only counting naked and from a real person (no AI, no drawings) is a low low number, and even skipping porn most pimps will have seen that number in their lives.
Eq0@literature.cafe 2 weeks ago
Poor gynecologists…
Im_old@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I can confirm that I’ve defied the curse then! 😅
ceenote@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Are you saying parents can’t have porn addictions?
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think they just meant that having a kid opens it up so you might not stay #1.
HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
No I more meant that OP could keep their lead perpetually by not having kids who could top them.
arin@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The internet isn’t for porn?? Oh no
TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Adding this to the list of benefits to being snipped.