“Top-down mandates to use large language models are crazy,” one employee told Wired. “If the tool were good, we’d all just use it.”
Yep.
Management is often out of touch and full of shit
Submitted 7 hours ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to technology@lemmy.world
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/jack-dorsey-block-falling-apart-ai
“Top-down mandates to use large language models are crazy,” one employee told Wired. “If the tool were good, we’d all just use it.”
Yep.
Management is often out of touch and full of shit
You wanna know who really bags on LLMs? Actual AI developers. I work with some, and you’ve never heard someone shit all over this garbage like someone who works with neural networks for a living.
That’s me, but for QA…
Management: “No, that doesn’t work, because employees spend so much time doing the actual work that they lack the vision to know what’s good for them. Luckily for them I am not distracted by actual work so I have the vision to save them by making them use AI.”
At work today we had a little presentation about Claude Cowork. And I learned someone used it to write a C (maybe C++?) compiler on Rust in two weeks at a cost of $20k and it passed 99% of whatever hell test suite they use for evaluating compilers. And I had a few thoughts.
I think this is a cool thing in the abstract. But in reality, they cherry picked the best possible use case in the world and anyone expecting their custom project is going go anything like this will be lighting huge piles of money on fire.
A C compiler in two weeks is a difficult, but doable, grad school class project (especially if you use lex and yacc instead of hand-coding the parser). And I guarantee 80 hours of grad student time costs less than $20k.
Frankly, I’m not impressed with the presentation in your anecdote at all.
Agree with all points. Additionally, compilers are also incredibly well specified via ISO standards etc, and have multiple open source codebases available, eg GCC which is available in multiple builds and implementations for different versions of C and C++, and DQNEO/cc.go.
So there are many fully-functional and complete sources that Claude Cowork would have pulled routines and code from.
The vibe codes compiler is likely unmaintainable, so it can’t br updated when the spec changes even assuming it did work and was real. So you’d have to redo the entire thing. It’s silly.
Man, corporate layoffs kill productivity completely for me.
Once you do layoffs >50% of the job becomes performative bullshit to show you’re worth keeping, instead of building things the company actually needs to function and compete.
And the layoffs are random with a side helping of execs saving the people they have face time with.
Who?
The original creator of Twitter and now creator of Bluesky and whatever this thing that’s falling off the rails is.
Basically another billionaire living in his own little bubble and huffing his own farts too much.
Is that thumbnail a scene from 12 monkeys?
Naw. This is clearly just 1 monkey.
Right before he dies, yeah
Uhhh, Block is the the parent company of Square (formerly known as Square Up). This is actually a huge company, not some little side thing.
Gonna need a longer beard.
ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 hour ago
I had a meeting with my boss today about my AI usage. I said I tried using Claude 4.5, and I was ultimately unimpressed with the results, the code was heavy and inflexible. He assured me Claude 4.6 would solve that problem. I pointed out that I am already writing software faster than the rest of the team can review because we are short staffed. He suggested I use Claude to review my MRs.