“Everything I don’t like is terrorism.”
What is this, 2001 again?
Submitted 17 hours ago by Beep@lemmus.org to technology@lemmy.world
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46903556
“Everything I don’t like is terrorism.”
What is this, 2001 again?
Did it ever stop?
It’s accelerated: In 2001, technology companies were forced to collect user data and realized it could be a goldmine. Today, technology companies are being forced to collect people’s IDs… I’m sure this will end up just fine.
Spoken like an antifa, uh, 3 star general. Get him boys! /s The future is a lot dumber than we might have thought.
Hey, man. I am four stars at least.
Flock is a terrorist organization.
Flock is a state sponsored terrorist organization.
Since Flock CEO wants to give this movement some press
Here’s Benn Jordan, he’s done a series of videos on the cameras, demonstrates their vulnerabilities, and talks about how Flock has been deploying secretly by co-opting local municipalities to subsidize their national rollout.
First video, the one seems to have started the major anti-Flock push: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp9MwZkHiMQ
Follow-up showing how easy they are to hack: www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY
More live demonstrated vulnerabilities: www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo
Not as directly related, but he discusses a way to use generative AI models to create noise masks for your specific plate that will disrupt the OCR process that ALPRs use. (Key term: Adversarial Noise) www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_F4rEaRduk
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKr3Acrovio
This dude also has some solid videos on flock (and other things). Everyone should know that cities and towns are kicking flock out left and right. Use this momentum to organize against them in your town too!
This guy is the coolest type of hacker.
Does he care to explain why they leave town when cities or states simply tell them that all the data they collect becomes public domain?
Oh, so they aren’t providing a public service, the only thing they care about is selling my data and keeping it secret.
Feeling the need to state “they are closer to Antifa than anything else” might get you thinking…
So… Flock have literally described themselves as fascist…
Their self description fits their actions.
Their what?
I used deflock to look for cameras around me; I CANNOT leave my city limits by car without passing by a Flock camera.
Same for me. In addition to deflock.me and haveibeenflocked.com, are there any community resource sites for finding others in the same city that would be willing to start pushing on the city to cancel their contract?
My city is one of the few in my county that doesn’t have a contract with flock, but the county was nice enough to put them up around town anyway.
Is there a resource to find out who has contracts with Flock?
Flock cameras need to be banned, and the ones that are left should absolutely be destroyed. There is no excuse for having these things in communities.
I believe the collection of the information is inevitable. What I would push for instead of driving them to make the cameras and databases more clandestine than they already are is for the information that they collect to be made openly available to all.
As things are, it’s a very asymmetrical power tool for the advantage of the (government) operators.
When ALL the information is available to everyone, we can talk about where the cameras do and do not need to be. And any unapproved cameras can be suppressed as evidence against private individuals.
That’s like saying that it’s inevitable that murder and rape will happen.
Just because someone is going to do it eventually doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t have the death penalty for doing it.
exhibit of a word without meaning
Funny because I consider Flock a terrorist organization
Can someone explain how this makes any sense? They were ordered legally to deactivate and remove, unilaterally decide to put them back up and reactivate, the authorities (whomever those are) resort to covering them instead of removing and destroying them because “removing them is illegal”?
What the actual fuck is this?
Notice how a lot of these servailence CEO often come across as quite skittish and oddly concerned about what other are doing while obvuscating their own actions, kind of reminds me of a someone I used to know with diegnosed parinoid…
Just sayin…
good, terrifying CEOs is the right thing to do.
So we’ve moved on from Woke finally and just calling everything terrorist now? At least I won’t have to ask everyone saying “everything is so woke now” to define woke and watch them sputter.
That will just be replaced with asking them to define terrorism and watching them sputter.
He can go fuck himself.
Yeah anything or anyone that starves the greed disease is a terrorist. Shame that greed is only terminal for the victims of it and not the carriers
I think FLOCK is a terrorist organizaion
Wonder if their CEO finally stopped responding to hacker news threads or if he’s still in there getting dunked on.
This guy couldn’t sound more fascist if he broke into German 1930s marching songs. This video should be used in education.
“Anything/anyone that cuts into my profits are terrorists.”
This guy is LITERALLY AL QUEDA ISIS and THE DEVIL.
Boost this signal! Actual Satan!!
We can all just say crazy shit. Fucking asshole. Choke.
DeFlock is just a front end for OSM, does that make OSM a “terrorist organization” too?
Funny, I’ve been calling Flock the same thing.
Deflock kind of implied by existing in the first place that they thought Flock was a terrorist organization
Fuck these bootlickers
I would like to kindly invite this person to lodge their head in a deeply recessed part of their own anatomy.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 17 hours ago
The word ‘terrorist’ has lost all meaning at this point.
otter@lemmy.ca 16 hours ago
I had to double-check what Deflock was for:
Sharing information about where cameras are located is terrorism now?
🙄
ozoned@piefed.social 16 hours ago
Careful! I think logic and questions are the new terrorist things to do! Oooo scarey!
Damage@feddit.it 15 hours ago
Shit from the title I thought they were going around smashing the cameras and that it was an exaggeration, but I was clearly wrong on the scale
sorghum@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
This is just a play out of the rules for radicals playbook: accuse others of what you are doing.
Maeve@kbin.earth 16 hours ago
DARVO
defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
It lost all meaning the second Bush declared the “War on Terror”.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
It means ‘Enemy of the rich’ now
Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 hours ago
It never had any meaning. Reagan had them redefine it in a way that didn’t implicate America.
chisel@piefed.social 12 hours ago
That’s partly the point. Use words that accurately describe your evil group to incorrectly describe other groups and all of a sudden the words lose meaning and nobody can call you that anymore. Hooray!
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 hours ago
In the UK the term is defined by the government as anyone who is deemed by the government a threat to the government or the people or someone’s property or the predominant local religion. But recently it’s been exclusively used for the first one. In this country state law is valued higher than corporate, moral, ethical and religious laws, so YMMV
Link
tabular@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
In the UK it means the cop wants your ID and is willing to pretend your camera is a gun to get it.
hector@lemmy.today 13 hours ago
It’s so broad, they can accuse anyone of it, and that’s the point. Both parties have long supported these over broad laws too, because they are not on our side, they want the ability to bring the power of the state on the heads of any groups that might not be breaking the law in a way any reasonable person would condemn but still scare those aritstocrats.
hector@lemmy.today 13 hours ago
It never had meaning. To instill deep fear. Doing violent acts with the purpose of achieving a political end.
It’s always been super broad and just waiting for a domestic party to adopt the tactics of Israel’s occupied territories here in the US, that’s where this was always heading.