Flock is a terrorist organization.
Flock CEO calls Deflock a “terrorist organization”
Submitted 2 weeks ago by Beep@lemmus.org to technology@lemmy.world
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46903556
Comments
grue@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
snooggums@piefed.world 2 weeks ago
Flock is a state sponsored terrorist organization.
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
“Everything I don’t like is terrorism.”
What is this, 2001 again?
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Did it ever stop?
XLE@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
It’s accelerated: In 2001, technology companies were forced to collect user data and realized it could be a goldmine. Today, technology companies are being forced to collect people’s IDs… I’m sure this will end up just fine.
hector@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Spoken like an antifa, uh, 3 star general. Get him boys! /s The future is a lot dumber than we might have thought.
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Hey, man. I am four stars at least.
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
Feeling the need to state “they are closer to Antifa than anything else” might get you thinking…
NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
So… Flock have literally described themselves as fascist…
snooggums@piefed.world 2 weeks ago
Their self description fits their actions.
axh@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Their what?
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Since Flock CEO wants to give this movement some press
Here’s Benn Jordan, he’s done a series of videos on the cameras, demonstrates their vulnerabilities, and talks about how Flock has been deploying secretly by co-opting local municipalities to subsidize their national rollout.
First video, the one seems to have started the major anti-Flock push: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp9MwZkHiMQ
Follow-up showing how easy they are to hack: www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY
More live demonstrated vulnerabilities: www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo
Not as directly related, but he discusses a way to use generative AI models to create noise masks for your specific plate that will disrupt the OCR process that ALPRs use. (Key term: Adversarial Noise) www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_F4rEaRduk
topherclay@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This guy is the coolest type of hacker.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKr3Acrovio
This dude also has some solid videos on flock (and other things). Everyone should know that cities and towns are kicking flock out left and right. Use this momentum to organize against them in your town too!
jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Can someone explain how this makes any sense? They were ordered legally to deactivate and remove, unilaterally decide to put them back up and reactivate, the authorities (whomever those are) resort to covering them instead of removing and destroying them because “removing them is illegal”?
What the actual fuck is this?
7101334@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
My guess (emphasis “guess”) is either some contractual bullshit or a result of state law superseding local law.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This is why when my city installed them (with a 3-2 vote from Council) they required them to all be installed in the Right-of-Way, which gives the city more authority to remove them if the contract is terminated (which it likely will be soon).
nforminvasion@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Fascism. The only thing that matters is power and deception.
blitzen@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
I used deflock to look for cameras around me; I CANNOT leave my city limits by car without passing by a Flock camera.
Anonymouse@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Same for me. In addition to deflock.me and haveibeenflocked.com, are there any community resource sites for finding others in the same city that would be willing to start pushing on the city to cancel their contract?
TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
My city is one of the few in my county that doesn’t have a contract with flock, but the county was nice enough to put them up around town anyway.
blitzen@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Is there a resource to find out who has contracts with Flock?
aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
A question to nobody in particular: would it be possible to make a license plate cover that is made out of the same material as those anti-facial recognition glasses?
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s not just license plate readers anymore. They have cameras that perform facial recognition and other identifying recognition.
Your car is in many ways uniquely identifiable by its markings and its model that vehicle with many pictures of it and that license plate are already in a database. If you have stickers, if you have big dents or additions and changes from the base model of your vehicle than you are quite identifiable within a particular geographical area depending on the urban density.
blitzen@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
There’s YouTube video out there, the name escapes at the moment, where he figures out how to basically insert “noise” over his license plate that can lead to flock cameras not recognizing it. Fascinating stuff.
Two big issues IMO. 1) maybe it fools cameras now, but who knows if it continues to. 2) it’s illegal to cover your plate, probably doubly with the intent to obfuscate. My solution is bike rack. “Oops, didn’t meant to cover my plate” is good plausible deniability.
obvs@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Flock cameras need to be banned, and the ones that are left should absolutely be destroyed. There is no excuse for having these things in communities.
MangoCats@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
I believe the collection of the information is inevitable. What I would push for instead of driving them to make the cameras and databases more clandestine than they already are is for the information that they collect to be made openly available to all.
As things are, it’s a very asymmetrical power tool for the advantage of the (government) operators.
When ALL the information is available to everyone, we can talk about where the cameras do and do not need to be. And any unapproved cameras can be suppressed as evidence against private individuals.
Semester3383@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s like saying that it’s inevitable that murder and rape will happen.
Just because someone is going to do it eventually doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t have the death penalty for doing it.
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Does he care to explain why they leave town when cities or states simply tell them that all the data they collect becomes public domain?
Oh, so they aren’t providing a public service, the only thing they care about is selling my data and keeping it secret.
ozoned@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
So we’ve moved on from Woke finally and just calling everything terrorist now? At least I won’t have to ask everyone saying “everything is so woke now” to define woke and watch them sputter.
snooggums@piefed.world 2 weeks ago
That will just be replaced with asking them to define terrorism and watching them sputter.
Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Notice how a lot of these servailence CEO often come across as quite skittish and oddly concerned about what other are doing while obvuscating their own actions, kind of reminds me of a someone I used to know with diegnosed parinoid…
Just sayin…
TORFdot0@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Funny because I consider Flock a terrorist organization
lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
He can go fuck himself.
cabbage@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
This guy couldn’t sound more fascist if he broke into German 1930s marching songs. This video should be used in education.
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Flock is a terrorist organization.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
flock feeding the videos to palintir calling people a terrorist orgniazation
ShittDickk@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Terrorist calls man stopping their terror a terrorist.
nialv7@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
good, terrifying CEOs is the right thing to do.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s always projection with Republicans
Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yes. Always.
whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
exhibit of a word without meaning
Reygle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think FLOCK is a terrorist organizaion
Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
“Anything/anyone that cuts into my profits are terrorists.”
W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Wonder if their CEO finally stopped responding to hacker news threads or if he’s still in there getting dunked on.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yeah anything or anyone that starves the greed disease is a terrorist. Shame that greed is only terminal for the victims of it and not the carriers
fiat_lux@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s a wonder people haven’t started throwing water balloons filled with mud and flour at the cameras. Perhaps he should be grateful that’s not a trend?
phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I think a drone with a remotely-actuated spray can of black paint would be more fun. Come down from above so nothing is caught by the camera. Control it by a fiber link so that there’s no signal to identify the drone.
Funny you should ask, yeah, I was discussing this the other day with some fellow techies down the pub.
bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I would’ve guessed that wireless would be the way to go since a fiber cable is quite literally a physical trace to your position. Are drones that easily identified by their wireless signal?
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Have you seen those 50W burning lazers? I wonder if one of those could fry sensors.
Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
I don’t know why I thought of this, but they make telescoping poles for wasp spray. I wonder if any other type of aerosol can would fit in them, or why you would even want to do that?
nomy@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Hi I work in an adjacent industry and paintball guns are very effective in (temporarily) blinding these cams.
Also harsh cleaning chemicals like Windex with Ammonia will degrade the IR/anti-glare coatings horribly and will lead to unusable shots within a season or two.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Add HIM to The List.
Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Funny, I’ve been calling Flock the same thing.
sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Fuck these bootlickers
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 weeks ago
The word ‘terrorist’ has lost all meaning at this point.
otter@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I had to double-check what Deflock was for:
Sharing information about where cameras are located is terrorism now?
🙄
ozoned@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Careful! I think logic and questions are the new terrorist things to do! Oooo scarey!
Damage@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
Shit from the title I thought they were going around smashing the cameras and that it was an exaggeration, but I was clearly wrong on the scale
sorghum@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
This is just a play out of the rules for radicals playbook: accuse others of what you are doing.
Maeve@kbin.earth 2 weeks ago
DARVO
defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
It lost all meaning the second Bush declared the “War on Terror”.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It means ‘Enemy of the rich’ now
chisel@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
That’s partly the point. Use words that accurately describe your evil group to incorrectly describe other groups and all of a sudden the words lose meaning and nobody can call you that anymore. Hooray!
Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 weeks ago
It never had any meaning. Reagan had them redefine it in a way that didn’t implicate America.
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
In the UK the term is defined by the government as anyone who is deemed by the government a threat to the government or the people or someone’s property or the predominant local religion. But recently it’s been exclusively used for the first one. In this country state law is valued higher than corporate, moral, ethical and religious laws, so YMMV
Link
tabular@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
In the UK it means the cop wants your ID and is willing to pretend your camera is a gun to get it.
hector@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
It’s so broad, they can accuse anyone of it, and that’s the point. Both parties have long supported these over broad laws too, because they are not on our side, they want the ability to bring the power of the state on the heads of any groups that might not be breaking the law in a way any reasonable person would condemn but still scare those aritstocrats.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
It means “me no like.”
hector@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
It never had meaning. To instill deep fear. Doing violent acts with the purpose of achieving a political end.
It’s always been super broad and just waiting for a domestic party to adopt the tactics of Israel’s occupied territories here in the US, that’s where this was always heading.