nialv7
@nialv7@lemmy.world
- Comment on two sides 1 day ago:
He also lost untold money in the stock market.
- Comment on Apple has REMOVED the ICEBlock app from the App Store due to “objectionable content.” 3 days ago:
You say that based on what?
- Comment on Labour Party members just defected to Your Party en masse 3 days ago:
Neither is any media balanced these days. Mass media is effectively kneeling before Nigel Farage like he’s had a crown on his head.
I say let The Canary do it. Might balance things out.
- Comment on Animal guessing game!!! 5 days ago:
oh it’s just my ████
- Comment on Opinions on Jurassic Park as a Zoo 1 week ago:
Would dinosaurs even get prion disease? I think birds don’t.
- Comment on Record breaker Starmer is the 'most unpopular PM since polling began' 1 week ago:
Pretty sure voters of one party hates all leaders of other parties. But Kier is additionally also hated by Labour voters, making him lower than everybody.
- Comment on Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards 1 week ago:
Labour: hmm, looks like we are still too high in the polls.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
this is what kirk would have wanted.
- Comment on Who owns Britain? The effects of privatisation on the costs of living in the UK 2 weeks ago:
British steel hasn’t been nationalised, the Government just took over its operations, the Chinese parent company still owns it.
- Comment on Dinner is ready! 2 weeks ago:
You forgot Puerto Rican and Jamaican food which is also in G.
- Comment on Wobble wobble 2 weeks ago:
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
- Comment on Oh Jesus he is cooked 2 weeks ago:
Depends on what you think debate is, I guess. After posting my comment I did realize people probably conceptualise “debate” differently. If you think debate is just a form of performance to influence people’s ideas, then sure. But if you think debate should be a form of intellectual conversation, a collaboration between two disagreeing parties in order to find truth, then what Charlie is doing couldn’t be further from that.
- Comment on Why do people call it “woke”? 2 weeks ago:
Yeah, but then the neoliberals appropriated it to mean things like changing corporate logos to rainbow colors during Pride month while doing absolutely fuckall for the marginalized.
- Comment on Oh Jesus he is cooked 2 weeks ago:
Charlie was not doing debates. He was a propagandist. What he did was performing in the shape of a debate, in front of an audience to spread his agenda, and he was very good at that. If you scrutinize his “debate” in terms of logical soundness or other things a good argument should have, he wouldn’t stand a chance. But that was not the point, nor would it matter.
- Comment on Good shot indeed 2 weeks ago:
phew
- Comment on How many hands long do they get? 2 weeks ago:
And legally America does use the metric system…
- Comment on 5 Signs the AI Bubble is About to Burst 2 weeks ago:
but i didn’t notice anything specifically transphobic about it.
It might not sound transphobic to the uneducated, but many points she peddled in that video (esp. the Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria stuff) and used by transphobic groups to discredit trans people. There is a very good video (not related to Sabine) that explains all this stuff:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiOc0r31-Os
Be warned, it’s 5 hours long. (Yes, there is a lot to explain, and there is a lot of bad stuff there.)
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 2 weeks ago:
I am not going to believe your propaganda! My pristine, untainted thoughts won’t take this slander. /s
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 2 weeks ago:
Huh? That wasn’t what I was doing at all, you just pulled that accusation out of your ass.
So you actively ignore evidence that might be inconvenient to your opinions?
- Comment on 5 Signs the AI Bubble is About to Burst 2 weeks ago:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR_RAp73ra0
And here are some videos categorizing more of her grifts: www.youtube.com/watch?v=70vYj1KPyT4 www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJjPH3TQif0
And more: www.youtube.com/watch?v=oipI5TQ54tA
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 2 weeks ago:
First of all, you completely missed the main point of my comment. If you think there’s no evidence then you shouldn’t be claiming one way or the other either, yet this post is presenting him as definitively right wing.
Secondly, I didn’t say he is a left winger. I said (based on my judgement) the evidence shows he probably, maybe leans left.
And answering your “what evidence” question, his text message to his roommate is released by the investigation. There are also statement from his mother stating he is “getting more and more left” (obviously, grains of salt). And there are leaked (released?) Discord messages from the killer.
If you never heard any of these, then you probably are in an echo chamber.
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 2 weeks ago:
We can agree that the right wing is trying to use Kirk’s death as casus belli to start a civil war against us. We are in a dangerous position right now.
But at the same time we can also choose to NOT spread misinformation like this. No, we don’t know right now what political leaning the killer has. If anything, if the evidences released by the investigation can be trusted, he is more likely to be left leaning.
Yes, the right spreads misinformation all the time to further their goals. But I think we can do better.
- Comment on 5 Signs the AI Bubble is About to Burst 2 weeks ago:
She has also peddled transphobic talking points
- Comment on Willing to get “fired” 3 weeks ago:
this empathy quote did get me riled up, but later i found out there was more to this quote. i’m not going to tell you how to feel, but i’ll just put this here:
[…] Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It was all about empathy and sympathy. I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That’s a separate topic for a different time. - Charlie Kirk
- Comment on Labour votes AGAINST letting disabled people use the bus for free before 9:30am 3 weeks ago:
They are not Labour. Right now what we have are just red Tories and blue Tories.
- Comment on if charlie kirk is so pro life then why is he dead? 3 weeks ago:
false flag attack to get people off Trump’s back about Epstein files?
- Comment on quiet place 3 weeks ago:
Live next to a waterfall and you’ll be fine.
- Comment on They were weak 3 weeks ago:
Well they thought butterflies ate butter, so they called them “flies that eat butter”, hence butterfly. (that’s one of the theories at least)
- Comment on They were weak 3 weeks ago:
Wiktionary tells me it meant “butterfly caterpillars”.
Huh??
- Comment on Scientific unprogress... 4 weeks ago:
Wakefield did manage to fool peer reviewers and got his paper published in Lancet, a top-tier medical journal (and it took them 12 years to fully retract that paper). So I wouldn’t say people recognized that immediately.