Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Just up the production quality and they'll love it, Trust me bro 👍

⁨0⁊ ⁨likes⁊

Submitted ⁨⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago⁊ by ⁨HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world⁊ to ⁨[deleted]⁊

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/594cd62c-0a97-4a16-bee1-18d333e962b8.webp

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Is this better?

    Image

    source
    • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Stop, I can’t get any harder!

      source
      • SippyCup@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        That sounds like something a quitter says. YOU LOOK AT SEXY JASON ALEXANDER UNTIL YOU POP

        source
      • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        Image

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    I love that I can literally see the lady on the left’s nipples through her shirt but God forbid I see the word “Nudes”

    source
    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      We freed the nipple, now we just gotta free the nodes

      source
    • foo@feddit.uk ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      I thought it was a fancy letter o. Everyone loves nodes.

      source
    • crapwittyname@feddit.uk ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Reported for offensive language/hate speech

      source
      • SippyCup@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        Careful. They’ll hunt you down and ban you from life on my instance for thinking dirty thoughts too loud.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Almost had to read a naughty word. That was fucking close you cunt ass bitch

    source
    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Image

      source
  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Why in fuck’s name would the algo care about “nudes”? Clout-chasing morons…

    source
    • rumba@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      the algo

      This is about instagram/facebook/ticktok demonitizing for sex/drugs/violence/harm because advertisers won’t put their money behind that for fear of a religious call to cancel.

      Sadly, we’re just getting thriftstore memes.

      source
    • ptu@sopuli.xyz ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      I don’t know how Lemmy is built, but I’m quite sure there isn’t any automatic OCR to scan for some naughty words

      source
      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        It’s more that these are usually terrorists from elsewhere where either there are or people think there are such systems in place that may affect their “reach”

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • percent@infosec.pub ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Thanks for censoring the word “n•des” so it’s family friendly

    source
    • IndridCold@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      One day she’ll be intimate with someone and nude won’t seem like a dirty word.

      source
  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Send me nudes of your souls, not your bodies!

    source
    • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Drat, all I have is an IOU where my soul was supposed to be.

      source
    • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago
      like this?

      Image

      source
      • dastechniker@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        yo, that’s awesome! did you paint that yourself?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • bhamlin@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        Whoa! Thanks for the spoiler tag. That’s some intense shit right there

        source
  • yumyumsmuncher@feddit.uk ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Guys please don’t omit balls

    source
  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    I’ve been told my nudes are very tasteful. They want a sexy picture of you with your junk showing, (preferably full nudes, or pants fully down, nobody looks appealing with a frank and beans spilling out of their zipper) and not just a picture of your schlong.

    source
    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      It’s efficiency. The subject matter is the frank n’ beans, who cares about the rest? Likewise, I would be perfectly content with receiving faceless melons flopped out of a bra.

      source
      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        If it works for you then it works for you, but I’m telling you that nothing soaks panties like a candid shot of you nude while washing the dishes or cooking. Toss an apron on to leave something to the imagination for extra points, it’s like lingerie for dudes.

        source
    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Can you show us an example for reference?

      source
      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        Notasharkinamansuit don’t freak for free.

        source
    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      I just put a little top hat on my dick and call it good

      source
      • Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        C’mon, at least draw on a smile, stick on some googly eyes, trim off a bit of your pubes and paste them on styled as muttonchops…

        source
  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    You guys are putting your faces in your nudes? I just take a picture of mine next to one of those little bottles of vodka you get on airplanes. I call it, cockfishing…

    source
  • Xylight@lemdro.id ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    sapnu puas

    source
    • moopet@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      How did you write that umop apisdn?

      source
    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Image

      source
  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Nodes? Nades? I don’t get it.

    source
    • bampop@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Here’s me getting all excited thinking a new Blender tutorial just dropped

      source
    • buttnugget@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Nodes was my first thought. I think they are sending around host machines or something.

      source
    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Don’t upvote this shit Jesus Christ people.

      Stop encouraging this.

      source
      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        I second this.

        source
    • Fedizen@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      'Nades. This is the pose each gender makes after lobbing a grenade into an opposing military position.

      source
  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    how about no nudes. thank god i’m not dating anymore. i love being single and free of responsibility. just me, my books/laptop/switch a nice tall glass of cold H20 and my vape.

    source
  • Aliya@feddit.org ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    One reason could be that most girls send nudes to a guy they actually like, and he asked for them. You wanna look good for him :o.

    Most nudes I got from guys were just random and unwanted tho.

    source
    • Denjin@feddit.uk ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Here’s my unsolicited dick pic:

      It’s a picture of Richard Nixon

      source
      • Aliya@feddit.org ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        Wow, didn’t expect that, gonna haunt my dreams :s

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        Image

        AROOOO!

        source
  • solomonschuler@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Why did I read this as nodes. Am I seriously that married to CS that I read Nudes as nodes (as in nodes from linked lists).

    I guess it doesn’t help that the they’ve used the character ‘•’ in place of the ‘u’ to solicite the word “Nudes.”

    source
    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Just don’t call her Alice or Eve (unless she’s willing to call you Bob)

      source
      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        I always wondered what it was Alice is sending that’s crucial to be unsniffable.

        source
    • python@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Tfw you ask her for nudes but she sends her node_modules folder

      source
  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    It’s still hot when women do it, for some reason.

    source
  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Send unsolicited cat pictures. Trust me, works way better.

    source
    • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Image

      source
  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    lol seriously. Like 90 percent of the nudes I’ve seen guys send is just so unflattering, I don’t get it

    source
    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Old, Broke, 2015: “Just needed to let you know that I do, in fact, have a very blurry penis”

      New Hotness in 2025: “Here’s half an inch of skin in thigh stripped thigh-highs”

      source
  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Send nudes*

    *nudibranches

    Image

    source
  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    You fucking wish.

    In reality nudes from women look shit too.

    People just generally give women a pass/see women as more attractive for the same equivalent level of attractiveness or effort for the photo. They also feel much more pressured by society to be all "WOW! I’ve never seen tits in my life!!! Magnifico! ✨✨🍆*

    Nudes suck.

    Thats my hot take.

    The fucking suck, the person sending them expects you to receive them like they’re gods gift to green earth and they’re (the photos, not the person) just mid, so you have to act like you’re a pavloved chimpanzee in full caveman mode so excited by this barely lit could be big foot sighting.

    At best nudes are an indication the person sending you them wants to fuck.

    They’re not jerk off material. They’re barely semi chub material.

    They’re just… mid.

    Could be the hottest person imaginable and they’d still be mid.

    Its ultimately just a poorly taken picture with poor lighting, with someone who (reasonably) won’t be bending over backwards to send you page 34 of the Kama Sutra.

    It would be so fucking nice if it was deemed socially appropriate to say “Look lady, I don’t need to see a 15th picture of your gooch from the same fucking angle” (but you know, with tact), but instead if you ever were to do that, they’d misinterpret your message as “I’m not all that sexually interested in you” rather than “I’m not all that sexually interested in every piece of evidence there is for extraterrestrial UFOs existing, but in a vaguely human shape”.

    Just a bit of a rant I hope was humorous but like seriously, I thought a few years back… probably like 15-20 years back, we all kinda agreed that nudes were stupid for security and revenge porn reasons, but now it seems the world is back at it again, for seemingly no reason, because next to no one is actually masturbating to these, and its like, just some fun chatting would get across the same effect or more, because it could display more personal knowledge of the other persons preferences and your desire for them.

    Bah.

    source
    • irelephant@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      New copypasta just dropped

      source
    • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Speak for yourself

      source
    • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Could not disagree more. Nudes don’t have to be “jerk of material.” That’s not why my partners and I send them to each other. They’re more for mutual appreciation. We like looking at each other’s bodies because we’re attracted to each other, not because we’re expecting to run one out. Also, sounds like you/the people you share nudes with need to take better nudes lol. We take excellent * photos with *excellent lighting (when the mood strikes is). Taking a “photo of your gooch” from the same angle is the woman equivalent of the right side of the meme. We all should know better.

      Pose, angle, and lighting, people!

      source
      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

        I’m sure you’re right for you, but I’m personally of the opinion that I appreciate a body best in person, and there is basically no way the amount of effort to take a good selfie is worth the relatively small payoff bonus vs chatting them up.

        Like, I think you kinda have to be into to taking the photos themselves for it to be worth it.

        I’m sure its all a preference thing and how much individual people value nudes.

        Also

        Taking a “photo of your gooch” from the same angle is the woman equivalent of the right side of the meme. We all should know better.

        I am definitely being a bit hyperbolic here, as I mostly meant to exaggerate the difference between successful non celebrity nsfw content creators and regular person pictures.

        I do think you have a point here though.

        source
    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      I don’t take nudes often, but when I do, I put some effort into it. Proper lighting, proper posing, interesting scene composition.

      Also, I generally agree that if there aren’t any nudes of you, it’s often a good idea to not start making them (because society sucks, not because nudes are inherently a problem), but knowing that nude pictures of you are available online already is pretty freeing in that regard.

      I don’t know what exactly my point is, except for that you might need to date people with higher nudes standards.

      source
    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      that’s definitely a hot take but I respect your opinion

      source
    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Hot take, I agree wholeheartedly. I don’t see the appeal of engaging in this weird dating app style of courting people and it does absolutely zip for me. Even for a casual hookup. Just kind of kills any sort of hype or tension. I’d much rather have some sexytalk and then meet up. Nudes are boring.

      source
    • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

      Someone’s never received good nudes

      source
  • Klear@quokk.au ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    What are nodes?

    source
  • HerrNetzwwerk@feddit.org ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Real question how du I make it classy

    source
  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com ⁨5⁊ ⁨months⁊ ago

    Holy fuck even “nudes” is getting censored now

    source