Guests report getting billed hundreds of dollars for smoking, based on the readings of an “algorithmic” smoke detector. The sensor manufacturer, Pell, markets its product as a way for hotels to unlock new revenue streams.
Yet another huge win for those who choose to never leave their basements.
I miss my basement.
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
I have never seen a more clear cut example of a perfect use case for a credit card chargeback.
Fun fact: You can’t dispute part of a charge. If you charge this back and win (you probably will) the hotel loses out on everything, for your entire stay. It also stacks up against them and raises their rates the more they get. An even vaguely concerted effort by people who have been ripped off by this would probably get the hotel in question booted from their credit card processor.
I imagine it’s damn difficult to run a hotel if you can’t accept credit cards. Just saying.
imrighthere@lemmy.ca 20 hours ago
They disputed it with their bank, the bank sided with the hotel because of the sensor report. Just saying.
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Sounds like they also need to find a new bank, then.
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
How do you prove to the bank or in a court of law that you didn’t do something? The hotel is alleging that their algorithm detected smoking.
Besides setting up a camera which seems to be very invasive, how would you fight this?
ook@discuss.tchncs.de 20 hours ago
Surprise, banks also pull disgusting shit. Who would have thought about that.
LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 19 hours ago
They tried that. If the credit card denies it you could have a lawyer send a letter threatening legal action but that’s all going to be at an extra cost unless you know and attorney or they think they could make enough to o do it on spec.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Or you pay monthly for a law service. Those types of letters are exactly what those programs are intended to cover.
InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 18 hours ago
In two different cases where I’ve disputed part of a charge/order, the credit card company returned the money for the entire order like you said. I was surprised they did that, and didn’t realize that was the norm.
On the one hand, I never wanted anything I extra that I didn’t deserve. On the other hand, both times this has happened to me, the companies at fault really, really went out of their way to deserve it. Not necessarily scam level deserved it like this hotel’s smoke detector scam, but still.
0x01@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
Many credit card software providers also charge for the investigation of chargebacks, to the tune of hundreds of dollars, even if the chargeback is reversed.
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Accumulating a history of chargebacks against you as a merchant, even if the consumer ultimately loses them, also counts against you and will raise your rates. The processors don’t like dealing with merchants that they perceive as excessively risky.
I have to deal with this in my business and the whole thing is really a pain in the ass.
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
That’s not where it ends though. They can send you to collections.
Happened to me from Verizon after I returned their modem and they said I didn’t.
Many different collectors called and wouldn’t the same track# and photos to show it was returned. It eventually went on my credit, which took a slight hit for all of 2 months.