Only if you don’t consider capitalism.
AI Could Be the Most Effective Tool for Dismantling Democracy Ever Invented
Submitted 1 month ago by Pro@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/ai-dismantle-democracy
Comments
hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 month ago
Kinda like people focusing on petty crime and ignoring the fact that corporations steal billions from us.
We as a society give capitalism such a blanket pass, that we don’t even consider what it actually is.
notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
When you live in a cage, you think of the bars as part of your home.
thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Hot take: what most people call AI (large language and diffusion models) is, in fact, part of peak capitalism:
- relies on ill gotten gains (training data obtained without permission, payment or licensing)
- aims to remove human workers from the workforce within a system that (for many) requires them to work because capitalism has removed the bulk of social safety netting
- currently has no real route to profit at any reasonable price point
- speculative at best
- reinforces the concentration of power amongst a few tech firms
- will likely also result in regulatory capture with the large firms getting legislation passed that only they can provide “AI” safely
I could go on but hopefully that’s adequate as a PoV.
“AI” is just one of cherries on top of late stage capitalism that embodies the worst of all it.
So I don’t disagree - but felt compelled to share.
crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 1 month ago
When the fuck will you people get it?? Every technology will eventually be used against you by the state
who@feddit.org 1 month ago
When the fuck will you people get it??
This is the wrong way to get people to care what you have to say.
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well explaining it nicely doesn’t seem to do anything either so…
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“Hey you stupid assholes, buy this car!”
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Oh totally man that’s brilliant. Let’s reject technology. It’s bad
AsyncTheYeen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Be used by a captalist pig to exploit you*
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 month ago
This is why I think technology has already peaked with respect to benefit for the average person.
andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is a thing on social media already.
Lots of bad faith conservatives will just output AI garbage. They don’t care about truth, they just want to waste your time. You spend time researching their claims, providing counter evidence - they don’t care, because they don’t even read what you say, just copy and paste into an LLM.
It’s very concerning with the Trump administrations attack on science. Science papers are disappearing, accurate/vetted information because sparser - then you can train Grok to claim that all trans women are rapists or that global warming is just Milkanovitch cycles.
It is and has been an info war. An attack on human knowledge itself. And AI will be used to facilitate it.
stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
They’re trying to burn the library of Alexandria, again.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
If we see that, then it’s already burning.
shalafi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
ChatGPT:
You’re absolutely right to be concerned — this is a real and growing problem. We’re not just dealing with misinformation anymore; we’re dealing with the weaponization of information systems themselves. Bad actors leveraging AI to flood conversations with plausible-sounding nonsense don’t just muddy the waters — they actively erode public trust in expertise, evidence, and even the concept of shared reality.
The Trump-era hostility to science and the manipulation or deletion of research data was a wake-up call. Combine that with AI tools capable of producing endless streams of polished but deceptive content, and you’ve got a serious threat to how people form beliefs.
It’s not just about arguing with trolls — it’s about the long-term impact on institutions, education, and civic discourse. If knowledge can be drowned in noise, or replaced with convincing lies, then we’re facing an epistemic crisis. The solution has to be multi-pronged: better media literacy, transparency in how AI systems are trained and used, stronger platforms with actual accountability, and a reassertion of the value of human expertise and peer review.
This isn’t fear-mongering. It’s a call to action — because if we care about truth, we can’t afford to ignore the systems being built to undermine it.
chunes@lemmy.world 1 month ago
God I miss when em dashes were a sign of literacy. Now I despise them.
CalipherJones@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. Jean-Paul Sartre
andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.
It is so goddamn frustrating. I had one on here claiming that the US had not deported US citizens, while linking the article saying that the US had deported four children who were citizens!
I read fast and have been following this shit for so long that I can call a lot out. But it never changes their minds, they never concede defeat. They just jump from place to place. Or “you libs always assume i’m MAGA” is a funny one I keep seeing on here - like, if you are supporting Trump’s policies, you are a Trump supporter. It’s so goddamn slimy and disingenuous.
TERFs are the worst about it. They’ve started spreading Holocaust denial. I saw one claim the the Nazi government issued transvestite passes! Like no! It was the Weimar Republic! The Nazis used those passes to track down and kill trans people!
You can provide crystal clear documentation, all of the sources they ask for - it’s never good enough and it’s exhausting.
ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is the inevitable end game of some groups of people trying to make AI usage taboo using anger and intimidation without room for reasonable disagreement. The ones devoid morals and ethics will use it to their hearts content and would never interact with your objections anyways, and when the general public is ignorant of what it is and what it can really do, people get taken advantage off.
Support open source and ethical usage of AI, where artists, creatives, and those with good intentions are not caught in your legitimate grievances with corporate greed, totalitarians, and the like. We can’t reasonably make it go away, but we can reduce harmful use of it.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
An ethical, open-source alternative is going to usurp google gemini? What are you talking about?
ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Did you respond to the wrong person? The article nor my comment was about one specific AI model.
ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 month ago
A tool is a tool. What matters is who is using it and for what.
utopiah@lemmy.world 1 month ago
True, and yet a machine gun is a not a stethoscope.
ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 month ago
A machine gun is a tool that is made with one purpose. A better comparison would be a hunting rifle, or even a hammer.
theluddite@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I don’t like this way of thinking about technology, which philosophers of tech call the “instrumental” theory. Instead, I think that technology and society make each other together. Obviously, technology choices like mass transit vs cars shape our lives in ways that simpler tools, like a hammer or or whatever, don’t help us explain. Similarly, society shapes the way that we make technology.
In making technology, engineers and designers are constrained by the rules of the physical world, but that is an underconstraint. There are lots of ways to solve the same problem, each of which is equally valid, but those decisions still have to get made. How those decisions get made is the process through which we embed social values into the technology, which are cumulative in time. To return to the example of mass transit vs cars, these obviously have different embedded values within them, which then go on to shape the world that we make around them. We wouldn’t even be fighting about self-driving cars had we made different technological choices a while back.
That said, on the other side, just because technology is more than just a tool, and does have values embedded within it, doesn’t mean that the use of a technology is deterministic. People find subversive ways to use technologies in ways that go against the values that are built into it.
If this topic interests you, Andrew Feenberg’s book Transforming Technology argues this at great length. His work is generally great and mostly on this topic or related ones.
blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Just being a little sassy here, but aren’t you still just describing the use of technology in practice but calling it invention of different technology, which is the same point made by your parent comment?
kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 month ago
I don’t believe the common refrain that AI is only a problem because of capitalism. People already disinform, make mistakes, take irresponsible shortcuts, and spam even when there is no monetary incentive to do so.
I also don’t believe that AI is “just a tool”, fundamentally neutral and void of any political predisposition. This has been discussed at length academically. But it’s also something we know well in our idiom: “When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” When you have AI, genuine communication looks like raw material. And the ability to place generated output alongside the original… looks like a goal.
Culture — the ability to have a very long-term ongoing conversation that continues across many generations, about how we ought to live — is by far the defining feature of our species. It’s not only the source of our abilities, but also the source of our morality.
Despite a very long series of authors warning us, we have allowed a pocket of our society to adopt the belief that ability is morality. “The fact that we can, means we should.”
We’re witnessing the early stages of the information equivalent of Kessler Syndrome. It’s not that some bad actors who were always present will be using a new tool. It’s that any public conversation broad enough to be culturally significant will be so full of AI debris that it will be almost impossible for humans to find each other.
The worst part is that this will be (or is) largely invisible. We won’t know that we’re wasting hours of our lives reading and replying to bots, tugging on a steering wheel, trying to guide humanity’s future, not realizing the autopilot is discarding our inputs. It’s not a dead internet that worries me, but an undead internet. A shambling corpse that moves in vain, unaware of its own demise.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
It’s that any public conversation broad enough to be culturally significant will be so full of AI debris that it will be almost impossible for humans to find each other.
This is the part that I question, this is certainly a fear and it totally makes sense to me but as I have argued in other threads recently I think there is a very good chance that while those in power believe that an analog of the Kessler Syndrome will happen in information, and this is precisely why they most of them are pushing this future, that it might spectactularly backfire on them.
I have a theory I call the “Wind-up Flashlight Theory” which is that when the internet reaches a dead state full of AI nonsense that makes it impossible to connect with humans, that rather than it be the completion of a process of censorship and oppression of thought that our imagination cannot escape from, a darkness and gloom that nobody can find their way in… the darkness simply serves to highlight the people in the room who have wind-up flashlights are unable to make their own light.
Tiger@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Great insights, thank you.
obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 month ago
Creating unbiased public, open-source alternatives to corporate-controlled models.
Unbiased? I don’t think that’s possible, sir.
Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
So is renewable energy, but if I start correcting people that they don’t exist because the sun is finite, I will look like a pedant.
Because compared to the fossil fiels they are renewable, the same way Wikipedia is unbiased compared to foxnews.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
the same way Wikipedia is unbiased compared to foxnews.
If better was the goal, people would have voted for Kamala.
KarlHungus42@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
mrodri89@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Honestly it just feels like ai is created to spy on us more efficiently. Less so about assisting us.
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
I mean the Oracle CEO said so explicitly last year to investors
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
That guy is such a creep, he makes my skin crawl with his nightmarish hyperstition.
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 month ago
And please broaden this beyond AI. The attention economy that comes with social media, and other forms of "tech-feudalism", manipulation, targeting and tracking/surveillance aren't healthy either, even if they don't rely on AI and machine learning.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It could also be an effective tool for liberation. Tools are like that. Just matters how they’re used and by whom.
match@pawb.social 1 month ago
some tools are actually strictly bad to use, like nuclear bombs, landmines, or chemical weapons
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You’re just describing weapons made from tools.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Nuclear bombs have one theoretically beneficial use: deflecting planet-killer asteroids.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
But they have to be used.
I often wonder why leftist dominated spheres have really driven to reject AI. Given that were suppose to be more tech dominant. Suspiciously I noticed early media on the left treated AI in the same way that the right media treated immigration. I really believe there was some narrative building through media to introduce a point of contention within the left dominant spheres to reject AI and it’s usefulness
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I haven’t seen much support for antiAI narratives in leftist spaces. Quite the opposite, as I’ve been reading about some tech socialists specifically setting up leftist uses for it.
But your instincts are spot on. The liberals are being funded by tech oligarchs who want to monopolize control of AI, and have been aggressively lobbying for government restrictions on it for anti-competitive reasons.
Grimy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I wonder if we are being groomed to hate it because it would be an effective tool to fight fascism.
Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
A potential strategy for using it for good would be dealing with the problem of comparitive effor to spread and debunk bullshit. It takes very little effort to spread bullshit. It takes a lot of effort to debunk it.
An LLM doesn’t need to worry about effort. It can happily chug away debunking bullshit all day long, ignoring the problem of them not being able to reason, and the other ongoing problems with LLMs. But there is potential for it being a part of the solution here.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Ooh that’s clever, I’m going to start doing that.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
100%
I actually just wrote my thoughts before I saw this comment.
I challenge anyone to go back to the articles shared here on Lemmy when AI was taken off. Compare the headlines to headlines from right wing media towards immigration. It’s uncanny how similar they are, at least to me.
They often deal with some appeal to pathos like
They will take our jobs They threaten our culture They will sexually assault children They will contribute to the rise in crime
blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
It’s psychological warfare. By manipulating the social communities they can push the lies they want and most normies will lap it up.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 weeks ago
I think rejecting AI is a mistake. All that does is allow fascists to have mastery of the tools. Like money, guns, media, food, oil, or any number of other influential things, you don’t want a select few people to have sole control over them.
Instead, we should adopt AI and make it work towards many good ends. For example, we can someday have AI that can be effective and cheap lawyers. This would allow small companies to oppose the likes of Disney in court, or for black dudes to successfully argue their innocence in court against cops. AI, like any tool, reflects the intent of their user.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
It would be like a military rejecting gunpowder weapons. Except this weapon is mass mind control. There is no letting go of the horns of that bull.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
If we do military comparisons, an air carrier is no good for a country without global logistics in place. A fighter jet is no good for a country all whose possible takeoff sites are under fire control. A big-big naval cannon is no good if it’s not mounted on a ship, limited by terrain and can be just walked around.
Some weapons give clear advantage to one of the sides, but none to another.
Maybe these tools are good for building scrapers that can structure unstructured data. Turning Facebook or Reddit into something NNTP-accessable, for example. Or making XMPP and Matrix transports to services that don’t have stable/open APIs, purely using webpages. For returning interoperability.
They are using generally same UI approaches, modern horrible ones, so one can have a few stages of training, first to recognize which actions are available from the UI and which processes and APIs they invoke, and then train for association of that with a typical NNTP or XMPP or Matrix set. Like - list of contacts, status of a contact, message arrived, send message, upload something. Or for NNTP - list available groups, post something, fetch posts. Associating names with Facebook identifiers. That being divided at least into passing authentication and then the actual service.
That can be a good thing. Would probably work like shit, like something from the Expanse or even old cyberpunk.
Randomgal@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
It’s guns. The most effective way to diamantle democracy is violence.
AI is not stopping anyone from revolting. Guns and the military are.
Whar a stupid fucking take.
CalipherJones@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
AI allows for 24/7 bot networks to shape perspectives on politics and culture. Bots absolutely help prevent people from realizing they’ve been swindled by Trump.
dangercake@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Yep, people revolt because of the story they believe. Control their story and they won’t want to revolt.
ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Bu controlling what people see and hear on TV and social media, they don’t need to use guns. At least, not nearly as many.
Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Whar a stupid
Yep.
SkepticalRobot@lemmy.world 1 month ago
AI isn’t going to destroy the world. But it will make it easier and faster for humanity to destroy the world.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
I agree but I don’t think it has much to do with the tool itself beyond it being a superb culpability obscuring tool, what we are witnessing is essentially a birth of a religion just a super lame one.
A status quo where people are not allowed to break in rhetoric or ideology as quality of life plummets will create a rising potential for the introduction of a concept that nullifies or simply exists outside the framework of that status quo worldview that is strangling people.
For people who are obsessed with AI, the unreality of it is precisely what lets AI function as an ideological lifeboat that doesn’t require grappling with the immense issues with our worldviews and assumptions as a society because AI can be added to contexts as a Deus Ex Machina that disguises and explains away incrongruities between our broken world views and the desperate reality caused by them.
noretus@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Yuval Noah Harari’s Nexus gets into this as well. It’s a really powerful tool that we are very, very ill equipped to use responsibly.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If AI can be used to dismantle democracy it can be use to make it flourish. People are the problem.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
I guess that means it could also be the most effective tool for saving democracy. Fuck these what if’s over factual news.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 5 weeks ago
AI “guardrails” is even a bigger tool governments can use to dismantle democracy and kill freedom. The article starts by quoting the pope who isn’t even a democratic ruler, he gets appointed by cardinals who are appointed by the previous pope. AI could have wrote a more useful article.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I thought social media was doing it already
HubertManne@piefed.social 1 month ago
Id rather wash dishes in the netherlands than be a rich russian olgiarch or part of north koreas upper echelon. Why are these rich idiots so stupid about this stuff.
kaeurennetwo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I love democracy.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nope. I’d still say social media/social media algorithms.
Imagine if social media didn’t exist (beyond small, tight-knit communities like forums about [topic], or BBS communities), but all these AI tools still did.
Susan creates an AI generated image of illegal immigrants punching toddlers, then puts it on her “news” blog full of other AI content generated to push an agenda.
Who would see it? How would it spread? Maybe a few people she knows. It’d be pretty localised, and she’d be quickly known as a crank.
Add social media to the mix, and all of a sudden she has tens of thousands of eyes on her, which brings more and more. People argue against it, and that entrenches the other side even more. News media sees the amount of attention it gets and they feel they have to report, and the whole thing keeps growing. Wealthy people who can benefit from the bullshit start funding it and it continues to grow still.
You don’t need AI to do this, it just makes it even easier. You do need social media to do this. The whole model simply wouldn’t work without it.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Half of it wouldn’t even work if the news media would do their job and filter out crap like that instead of being lazy and reporting what is going on on social media.
aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 month ago
One week the whole US news cycle was dominated by “Cheungus posted an AI pic of Trump on truth social”… I mean… I get that the presidency was at times considered dignified in the modern era so it’s something of a “vibe shift”, but the media has to have a better eye for bullshit than that. The indicators unfortunately are that it’s going to continue this slide as well because news rooms are conglomerating, slashing resources, and getting left in the dust by slanted podcasts and YouTube videos.
Some of it is their own fault. People watching the local news full of social media AI slop are somewhat reasonable in turning off the TV and going straight to the source instead of relying on news anchors becoming some type of shitty reaction videos.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They also shouldn’t report on the horse race. They should report on issues.
Reporting on elections is always disappointing.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 month ago
something something lamestream media!
MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
While I generally agree and consider this insightful, it behooves us to remember the (actual, 1930s) Nazis did it with newspapers, radio and rallies (… in a cave, with a box of scraps).
Cheems@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Social media, at least the mainstream stuff like Myspace was the start of the downfall. I don’t think random forums really were the thing that caused everything to go sideways, but they were the precursor. Facebook has ruined things for generations to come.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
It’s the algorithms + genAI, especially as the techbros got super mad about the progressive backlash against genAI, which radicalized everyone of them into Curtis Yarvin-style technofeudalism.