Freaky
That statement should start with “in the past”. Recent depictions I’ve seen have them fully fleshed and feathered using up to date methods to create as accurate as possible models.
Submitted 3 weeks ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone/posts/Aa/4d/Aa4dkdLz73AjGmn.jpg
Freaky
That statement should start with “in the past”. Recent depictions I’ve seen have them fully fleshed and feathered using up to date methods to create as accurate as possible models.
We even have ways to figure out their colouring in some cases now! Like this sinosauropteryx:
That’s cool. How did they figure out the colouring?
omg look at it, it’s like a ferret with giant legs
That guy sounds snotty.
That post is of course a billion years old itself and the images created by shrink-wrapping are still in people’s heads. Feathers on dinosaurs are rarely what people think of first as well and the notion has been around for quite a while.
Feathers have been found on dinosaur fossils only “recently”, with the discovery of Sinosauropteryx in 1996Image
I mean the lizard dinosaurs are everywhere. Every toy, movie, even in schools.
Maybe they don’t fit under the term of “paleoartists” (they are artists of Paleolithic creatures) but the most popular modern depictions of dinosaurs are presumably the Jurrasic World movies, and I think they are almost universally lacking plumage. I’ve only seen the first, but the images I’ve seen I don’t have any feathered dinos. So, no. This is still an ongoing issue.
New pokemon looks different
It’s neck is tied into a fucking knot 😂
That said though, this birb slaps. Really high power and good typing for the early game
Choose Goose is looking rough.
I am both frightened and aroused
crazy how there’s billion dollar movies that game embarrassingly incorrect dinosaurs in them
Movies often align to the popular perception if a thing rather than reality. Otherwise you’re watching a documentary.
it’s not like documentaries aren’t plenty popular, that recent series on dinosaurs (walking with dinosaurs, i think?) with our homeboy David Attenborough was hyped as fuck, no cap, on god, etc
Dino DNA!
While the look is based in old misconceptions of dinosaur biology, the Jurassic Park dinos lacking feathers actually works really well for the story. They were never meant to be real dinosaurs. They’re just theme park attractions, so of course they look how the customers expect them to. Just like how most of them aren’t even from the Jurassic period.
Yes that was the retcon explanation. The actual explanation is that they wanted to have Velociraptors in the movie and weren’t really bothered about the fact that they aren’t actually that big, there are species of raptor that are that large, but they didn’t want to use their names because they were less well-known. Velociraptor was one of the few dinosaurs people knew. T-Rex didn’t become famous until after Jurassic Park.
Those old-paleoartists were really unfettered.
🤣
This is so outdated it’s wrong.
Is it all the dinosaurs? Or just ones from specific eras that likely had feathers? Ill try to find ou5 myself later. But if anybody has a link to something akin to “feathered dinos for dummies” id love to check it out
From what i’ve seen it’s basically 50/50 if any one species had a significant amount of feathers, but feathers do seem to have existed in the earliest dinosaur ancestor so it could maybe potentially show up in any species.
Then you can get more detailed and memorize which kinds of dinosaur had what kind of feather covering, like sauropods seem to at most have some quills and similar decorations, while dromaeosaurs (dakotaraptor, velociraptor, etc) were basically big murder birds with full on wings.
But of course even within clades there could be significant difference: T.rex seems to have been, uh, covered in straight up skin like a giant plucked chicken… but at least some of its relatives were mostly covered in feathers.
Thank you! Now you owe me no explanation of course, and ill verify this information if I need to.
But may I ask, are you just well read in this department, or some sort of professional/expert?
All birds today are actually coelurosauria dinosaurs, a group of theropods (T-rex and raptor-shape dinosaurs) who are thought to have all had feathers for warmth, show, and/or gliding and flight. I know we have evidence that some other theropods had feathers (or at least hairy stuff), but I don’t know whether the rest of them are lacking evidence of feathers or whether we have evidence against them having feathers.
I would also love such a book, preferably with lots of pictures.
They’d look like dinosaurs.
I fucking knew it, they’re Tyranids!!
Wet owl moment
“Scientists believe that these strange creatures used their spiky arms to spear their prey.”
If swans were making a metal band…
Nah, they were an industrial band from the 80s
I’d say ‘nope!’ But they kinda look tasty…
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
So without their feathers they look like they act?
GreenShimada@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I hope what you’re implying is that swan feathers are a suit made to deceive humans from their obvious lizard people pet agenda, and that Big Feather needs to be held accountable. I’ve already booked guests for the podcast and have 17 articles in my substack,
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I want to see a Jurassic Park movie where it’s just geese and swans breaking out of captivity, and mildly annoying everyone.