I wonder how people have been doing it, since the beginning of time, with no help from technology.
Ya big fucking clown.
OpenAI supremo Sam Altman says he 'doesn't know how' he would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT
Submitted 1 day ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
atlien51@lemm.ee 15 hours ago
garretble@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
If street sweepers went away, people would notice within a week or two.
If tech bros went away, we’d just enjoy not having tech bros.
percent@infosec.pub 4 hours ago
Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if lots of new parents are asking LLMs for advice.
And before AI (and probably still), new parents probably googled a lot of things.
And before internet search engines, new parents probably checked out books from libraries.
turtlesareneat@discuss.online 2 hours ago
Parenting books were serious business, whole generations were raised with Dr Spock for instance, who had fucked up ideas about childrearing.
It’s one thing to ask for tips on getting a baby to sleep, it’s another to ask it for formula recipes. Unfortunately I doubt most parents know the line where it becomes dangerous, but I am hoping here.
Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
That man had kids?🤦♀️
AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
One, through surrogacy. Did he ask AI to explain to him how to fill his little jizz cup?
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Someone needs to Chat CPS.
shadowDingus@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
Seeing as ChatGPT was trained on other peoples’ books, articles, etc., it’s not surprising he says that.
Kinda slimy that he probably couldn’t even give sources for his new-found child wisdom. Y’know, because ChatGPT is a glorified corporate piracy machine using stolen data and aggregating it for morons like him to read instead of doing a google search.
nyan@lemmy.cafe 14 hours ago
Given what he’s undoubtedly being paid, I’m sure hiring a nanny to look after his unfortunate offspring is well within his budget.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 hours ago
Which he can afford because of ChatGPT. Checkmate.
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Chat GPT (condensed): You rich, hire a bitch.
FireWire400@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Somebody call CPS
BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That says a lot about how worthless if a human he is.
Sturgist@lemmy.ca 21 hours ago
if a human he is
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Maybe because he’s an idiot?
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I asked ChatGPT how Sam Altman would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT:
Sam Altman would’ve taken care of his baby the same way the rest of us did before his chatbot existed—by learning, asking, fumbling, caring, and figuring it out like a goddamn human.
Altman’s quote—“I don’t know how I would’ve done that”—feels less like a reflection on parenthood and more like an unintentional glimpse into the kind of disconnection that can happen when you believe your product is the answer to everything.
Of course, he’s not wrong that AI can be useful. But if your first thought when your newborn won’t sleep is to consult ChatGPT, that says more about your priorities than it does about parenthood.
barsoap@lemm.ee 22 hours ago
See even ChatGPT can emulate self-awareness better than Sam Altman.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 22 hours ago
Does he have a humiliation kink?
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
sammy knows what to say to get incurious venture capitalists to give him money
martin4598@lemm.ee 17 hours ago
Your kids will grow up and hate you because you suck as a dad.
Stern@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
For thousands of years people have raised their kids without the benefit of the moneypit 9000, Sam Altman is apparently dumber then a caveman.
dustyData@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Millions.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 hours ago
Someone who says this is not a fit parent and should have their children taken away from them.
numblyscabbyeach@lemmy.zip 15 hours ago
Poor little human . I mean the baby
sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 day ago
In other words, he’s an idiot.
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 23 hours ago
Cute how he finds new ways every day to say: “I’m a loser.”
MITM0@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
What in the actual fuck ‽
seven_phone@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well every other person that ever existed was raised without ChatGPT being necessary so just ask anyone.
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Counterpoint: the parents before chatgpt raised Altman, Hitler, musk, trump, Putin, Castro, etc.
SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I believe the answer Sam is by being a parent and figuring shit out. Babies do very few things: eat, pee, burp, shit and sleep. If they have done all those things within a reasonable timeframe then it is likely they are hot, cold or otherwise uncomfortable. And some babies just want you to talk to them and hold them. After spending time raising your child you’ll develop a sixth sense for what a cry is for so first you have to spend time with them.
Now, if you are filthy rich you shove the screaming sack of skin into the nearest nanny and GTFO. Later in life you’ll wonder why your relationship is business like at best and transactional at worst with your kid, which you will lament to your therapist about, but still fail to have the self realization that it’s because you were never a parent.
FanciestPants@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I also don’t understand how anyone could possibly not be a massive disappointment to their family without my patented Solutionbot 3600 that you can also take advantage of for just $$/month forever.
Money please!
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Who tf would have a baby with that wanker?
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Money.
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Just a big ol’ WTF here…
db2@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Forget chatgpt, I’m appalled that he reproduced.
Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Through surrogacy. He’s gay.
Zenith@lemm.ee 23 hours ago
It’s sad that all of our collective wisdom is so dead and gone people will turn to a glorified chatbot instead
xavier666@lemm.ee 21 hours ago
Please be a bit considerate. It’s hard to form human connections when you are trying to be a plague on humanity.
compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Has Sam Altman never heard of parenting books?
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 day ago
books
??? I think I’ll have to ask ChatGPT whatever the fuck you’re talking about.
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 23 hours ago
books
I guess he just didn’t like to buy a kindle.
insomniac@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
I’m not as anti AI as a lot of people here but trusting it with very important things is asking for trouble. It still randomly hallucinates and gives you bad info. Not as often as it used to but still not good enough to trust with your child’s health.
ChatGPT has taken my bread to the next level and helped me diagnose electronics problems way faster than I have figured out on my own, which is awesome. But it has also given me a blueberry muffin recipe with no wet ingredients and calculated bread hydration 10% too low. I can easily imagine a scenario where some tired parent asks it for a Motrin dose for an infant and gets a wildly wrong answer and injures their child.
korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 9 hours ago
Like many things, a tool is only as smart as the wielder. There’s still a ton of critical thinking that needs to happen as you do something as simple as bake bread. Using an AI tool to suggest ingredients can be useful from a creative perspective, but should not be assumed accurate at face value. Raisins and Dill? maybe ¯\(ツ)/¯, haven’t tried that one myself.
I like AI, for being able to add detail to things or act as a muse, but it cannot be trusted for anything important. This is why I’m ‘anti-AI’. Too many people (especially in leadership roles) see this tool as a solution for replacing expensive humans with something that ‘does the thinking’; but as we’ve seen elsewhere in this thread, AI CANT THINK. It only suggests items that are statistically likely to be next/near based on its input.
In the Security Operations space, we have a phrase “trust but verify”. For anything AI, I would use 'doubt, then verify" instead. That all said. AI might very well give you a pointer to the place to ask how much motrin an infant should get. Hopefully, that’s your local pediatrician.
Angelusz@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Fairly based. If you verify the output by visiting trusted medical sites, you won’t need a doctor for many things. Learn to do it on your own, become a medic. You have a kid, don’t rely on others for its survival. Only in emergency should a professional be needed.
There, nuance.
Coolbeanschilly@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
This is why I’ve not used any of this AI, at least in an overt sense. I will not surrender my ability to think to a machine. This is what they want.
MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That tracks.
kibiz0r@midwest.social 19 hours ago
We have mistaken rationality for a philosophy rather than a methodology, and efficiency for a virtue without any particular end in mind.
To have a unique, personal, subjective, divergent human experience is to sin against your prescribed algorithm.
AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That makes sense—being raised by ChatGPT might be marginally better than being raised by Sam Altman.
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 day ago
What a burn! Hahahahahah that was a good one!
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 hours ago
That you, Sam?