dustyData
@dustyData@lemmy.world
- Comment on Self-Host Weekly (4 September 2026) by @eshol 4 weeks ago:
I skim them all. The options I wrote are soft parodies of what each said. There’s a ton of problems with this model of governance, but I’m no voting member, so my opinion has no impact.
That said, it makes it so a single posture has to be voted on in its entirety, which is dumb (as some legislative bodies of the world have proven). As a result, nuance is erased alongside with any sense of ideological vision or compromise, and instead it promotes vagueness in every action and glacial institutions that break slowly break apart.
The very person who wrote the proposal that won reacted to winning with:
I regret the loss of contributors (which would have happened with either option winnign [sic]). It is just too early to take a final decision on the mater [sic]. Let’s revisit this in two years or so, and let this mess of a GR be a warning for our future selves.
The proposal was designed to win time without having to take any real stance while taking the smallest loss of contributors in the process. And thus it was written as the most milketoast nothing burger. When an infinite set of possibilities exists that actually do address real concerns like climate impact, social impacts, copyright and legal problems related to generated code, etc. in relation to the principles and overall values of the project. Instead, they are deferring the practicalities to pull request’s bickering.
But again, I’m not a voting member or contributor. So my opinion is null. I still think the way the process is designed and conducted is stupid and prone to cause the eventual failure of debian via governance collapse.
- Comment on Self-Host Weekly (4 September 2026) by @eshol 5 weeks ago:
The Debian vote was so stupid:
Option A: Psychotic breakdown Option B: Ethical impracticality Option C: Political extremism Option D: Two contradictory things at once Option E: Something that doesn't prevent the other options but packaged with something nasty and unpalatable Option F: Sensible but ultimately vague and action-less common place neutrality. Option G: Nuclear option Option H: Do nothing
It was such a brain dead exercise in futility.
- Comment on Plex’s crackdown on free remote streaming access starts this week - Ars Technica 10 months ago:
Navidrome for service. Dsub2000 on android and feishin on desktop.
There, all your needs covered.
- Comment on Plex’s crackdown on free remote streaming access starts this week - Ars Technica 10 months ago:
A VPS with a reverse proxy connected to your tailnet and a dyndns domain. It would be cheaper than Plex premium, you can use the vps for other stuff, and you have 100% certainty it will never ever show ads.
- Comment on 18% of people running Nextcloud don't know what database they are using 1 year ago:
Yeah, that is the kind of concern for the service developer or a very opinionated sys admin. For self-hosting, few people will reach the workload where such a decision has any material or measurable impact.