Don't ask for more pixels

Comments

• rustydrd@sh.itjust.works ⁨22⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

  The spectrum in question:

  Image

  source
• gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Don’t ask for more pixels

  Why? Because you’re unable to use basic reverse image search or because you’re too lazy and unwilling?

  Image

  source

  • lengau@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Because they know by doing that they can both get engagement and someone else to find the best quality version for them.

    source

    • gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      Why would getting engagement matter on lemmyshitpost?

      source
  • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Let them be :3

    source

    • gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Never! (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻

      source
    • fox2263@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Since lity is a trum

      source
• Lumidaub@feddit.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  So at some point, the original screenshot was posted somewhere that doesn’t allow the words “sexuality” and “spectrum” but “gayest” is a-okay. Interesting.

  source

  • lennee@lemm.ee ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    X?

    source

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Y! Z?

      … Oh wait, right, that’s a platform, I keep forgetting.

      source
    • Lemminary@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Formerly known as Twitter*

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Sergio@slrpnk.net ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Still trying to wrap my head around how a partial ordering plays out here. I think it’s fair to say that for any such nonempty spectrum, there exists at least one person about whom it can be said: “nobody is gayer than they are.” Right? (even if 1 or more people are equally gay…)

  source

  • zeca@lemmy.eco.br ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Its the difference between maximum gayness and maximal gayness. Maximum gayness is being more gay, or at least as gay, as everybody else; while maximal gayness is not being less gay than anybody else (just as you put it). Two people with maximal gayness can have incomparable gaynessess, and thats the key thing about partial orderings, this possibility of incomparability. there could be many maximally gay people. they wouldnt be equally gay, but incomparably gay.

    source

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world ⁨50⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

      maximal gayness

      Like Rattrap and Dinobot?

      source
  • kogasa@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    As long as we can put an upper bound on gayness (or more specifically on each totally ordered subset of people under the is-gayer-than relation) this follows from Zorn’s lemma.

    It’s also true by virtue of the fact that the set of all people who will have ever lived is finite, but “the existence of a maximal element in a poset” just screams Zorn’s lemma.

    source

    • wpb@lemmy.world ⁨39⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

      I think it’s better to avoid the axiom of choice in discussions about sexuality, as it seems to upset the conservatives.

      source
• Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Cum all over my tits, make me your alfredo dipped fucknugget

  source

  • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That doesn’t sound very gay??

    source

    • Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Most of my favorite women can ejaculate and several of my favorite men have tits. Phrased another way, genderfluid ungendered fluids.

      source
  • Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    If anyone wanted explicitly sexual words, they have them now. You’re welcome.

    source

    • lennee@lemm.ee ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      thanks

      source
• Peppycito@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Beastiality is a speculum? You do you, bra.

  source