kogasa
@kogasa@programming.dev
- Comment on All four major web browsers are about to lose 80% of their funding | by Dan Fabulich | Apr, 2025 1 week ago:
It’s a different situation, as a dev I’d happily bet my life on this assumption.
- Comment on All four major web browsers are about to lose 80% of their funding | by Dan Fabulich | Apr, 2025 1 week ago:
Dropping support for that stuff means breaking 95% of the websites people currently use. It’s a non-starter, it cannot ever happen, even if you think it would be for the best.
- Comment on Anybody? 2 weeks ago:
Math builds up so much context that it’s hard to avoid the use of shorthand and reused names for things. Every math book and paper will start with definitions. So it’s not really on you for not recognizing it here
- Comment on Anybody? 2 weeks ago:
🍕(–, B) : C -> Set denotes the contravariant hom functor, normally written Hom(–, B).
In this case, C is a category, and B is a fixed object in that category. For any given object X in C, the hom-set Hom(X, C) is the set of morphisms X -> B in C. For a morphism f : X -> Y in C, the Set morphism Hom(f, B) : Hom(Y, B) -> Hom(X, B) is defined by sending each g : Y -> B to gf : X -> B. This is the mapping C -> Set defined by Hom(–, C), and it’s a (contravariant) functor because it respects composition: if h : X -> Y and f : Y -> Z then fh : X -> Z and Hom(fh, C) = Hom(h, C)Hom(f, C) sends g : Z -> B to gfh.
- Comment on Anybody? 2 weeks ago:
It’s not nonsense, although there is a typo that makes it technically unsolvable. If you fix the typo, it’s an example calculation in the wikipedia page on cohomology rings.
- Comment on Anybody? 2 weeks ago:
It’s real projective space
- Comment on Plex is locking remote streaming behind a subscription in April 1 month ago:
It depends on if you use the “relay” feature. If your server is accessible from the outside it shouldn’t be using this though.
- Comment on Life isn't easy if your last name is 'Null' as it still breaks database entries the world over 2 months ago:
Code is easy in a vacuum. 50 moving parts all with their own quirks and insufficient testing is how you get stuff like this to happen.
- Comment on The science is divided 2 months ago:
No, that’s what induction is. You prove the base case (e.g. n=1) and then prove that the (n+1) case follows from the (n) case. You may then conclude the result holds for all n, since we proved it holds for 1, which means it holds for 2, which means it holds for 3, and so on.
- Comment on The science is divided 2 months ago:
It’s not actually claiming that all horses are the same color, it’s an example of a flawed induction argument
- Comment on Freed At Last From Patents, Does Anyone Still Care About MP3? 2 months ago:
Definitely not.
- Comment on Freed At Last From Patents, Does Anyone Still Care About MP3? 2 months ago:
All people. 320kbps mp3 is completely audibly transparent under all normal listening conditions. It’s a low-tier audiophile meme to claim otherwise but they will never pass a double-blind test.
- Comment on fuckery 5 months ago:
Yes, OP only gets you to Q[i]
- Comment on Infinite Suffering 6 months ago:
It can be, usually for college credit though
- Comment on Infinite Suffering 6 months ago:
At the universities I went to, Calc 2 was integration, sequences and series, then Calc 3 was multivariable. They really pack all the harder parts into 2.
- Comment on The return 7 months ago:
It’s called speed of lobsters