Imma just be pissed if her tiddies ain’t triangles.
Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered has a warning about racial and ethnic stereotypes
Submitted 8 months ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world
Comments
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 8 months ago
p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
triggies
reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Trigolbitties
Psythik@lemmy.world 8 months ago
If that thumbnail is a screenshot of the remaster, then they’re looking rather round to me.
johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The collection has both a remastered graphics mode and an option to switch to the original graphics.
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Well I’ll put the torch and pitchfork away for now then
Copernican@lemmy.world 8 months ago
But when will Nintendo start issuing those warnings for Mario games?
FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 8 months ago
This is fine, no issues really, but if you’re offended by something in a video game fictional story that was made over 20 years ago you should go touch grass.
Zahille7@lemmy.world 8 months ago
They did the same thing with the Destroy All Humans! remakes. Which was probably needed, because the Japanese level in 2 is really iffy
FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 8 months ago
eh. i get the ‘need’ for these companies to have the disclaimers and i honestly appreciate that they are not changing anything here. but the mob is fickle and seemingly can’t distinguish real life from the online life where being offended somehow gives them clout.
HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Yeah the Japan level made my jaw drop… the early 2000’s really were the last time you could be this blatantly racist against the Asian Community in popular media… But I’d rather go “Oooof” than pretend the game was never like this.
Katana314@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Even if I agree some games have gone too far on censorship, I don’t like having this totalitarian attitude to any kind of “offense”.
There are certain weird themes I really like in niche games, but I acknowledge if they were “thrown in” to a game about shooting or adventure, would sour the experience for a lot of common players. I’d point to perverted character designs as a common one - sexualized character designs are obviously appealing to some players, but to others they can actually make it hard to get absorbed in the story of a game like Xenoblade Chronicles 2 or Nier Automata. Even for a series like Persona, there have been players that decided “What weeb shit” and abandon the game because of the way female characters get harassed at times.
It’s easy to call it “political”, but politics comes from personal opinions - and it can genuinely affect how people view the media. These days I have a much more vehement reaction to stereotyped Native-American depictions (“Indians”) over when I was a kid. I doubt it’d make me hate Tomb Raider, but I can see why they’d have a warning.
CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 8 months ago
Do you see any merit to the pushback against such media?
You sound like you favor rationalism, and I agree with dismissing people who are crazy, but setting crazy people aside, do you see potential harm in reinforcing racial and ethnic stereotypes?
FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Stereotypes exist for a reason. They aren’t made up, non-existent characteristics. 90% of people that are getting offended by such things are not even part of the group that’s being stereotyped. It’s usually white liberals that are “offended” by any of this. Are they beneficial? probably not, but they sure are not nearly as harmful as people like you make them out to be. As a straight white man, I’m vilified by the mob regardless of my positions on anything, and that in itself is a stereotype. So I don’t put any stock into hypocritical perceived slights against humanity.
altima_neo@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
What stereotypes were in the games?
EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The stereotype that old British men are all butlers who get off on being locked in the freezer.
Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Indeed. Some of us prefer being locked in the pantry.
IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 8 months ago
While Crystal Dynamics didn’t specify which content it’s referring to, it’s speculated that it could be the animalistic depiction of Pacific Island natives in Tomb Raider 3, who are implied to be cannibals.
reversebananimals@lemmy.world 8 months ago
There might be others, but The Dagger of Xian plotline in Tomb Raider II is a little “woo woo Chinese mysticism”. You plunge it into your heart and turn into a dragon.
I’m not offended by it but I’d imagine that’s not the kind of thing you’d write in a video game today.
dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
Yet the Uncharted games exist.
Tash@lemmy.world 8 months ago
While Crystal Dynamics didn’t specify which content it’s referring to, it’s speculated that it could be the animalistic depiction of Pacific Island natives in Tomb Raider 3, who are implied to be cannibals.
Like the fictional Indiana Jones style villages? Or the real life North Sentinel Island Sentinelese? I’m scratching my head too…
chaogomu@kbin.social 8 months ago
The North Sentinel Island Sentinelese are not cannibals. They just want nothing to do with anyone not born on the island.
Which is a good policy to have, seeing as how the British genocided the rest of the Andaman Islands. They even landed on North Sentinel, kidnapped a few old people and children, and then sent the survivors back as plague bearers. (this was in 1880)
grayhaze@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Dinosaurs without feathers.
sbr32@kbin.social 8 months ago
In what world is that a question for a reasonable person?
A media company remade and re-released a piece of media and acknowledged that there may be problematic content, but that we should consider the time the media was made.
You don't need to know what the problematic content is, just accept their statement on it.
RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
In what world is that an answer for a reasonable person?
Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 8 months ago
you don’t need to know what the problematic content is
You seem like the kind of person who would become a moderator, start banning people and when they ask why they were banned you would block them after replying “lol get fucked”
In what way is acquiring more knowledge a bad thing? If I don’t recognize any possible problematic content, but other people say it’s there, why shouldn’t I be a Le to ask what’s problematic about it? Have I been going around being casually racist without knowing?
Like damn my dude you’re getting pissed at people for wanting to better themselves.
pendulum_@lemmy.world 8 months ago
“Shut up and consume”
That’s not how this works
Nudding@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Then they don’t need me to buy their shit lol.
squid_slime@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’d still like to know… Might be a deal breaker
GBU_28@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Shhhluuurrrrp
HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Honestly I’m glad we’ve moved from “Censor out anything that might be slightly objectionable” (Like they did with Sam & Max for example, and I believe the GTA Trilogy got hit with a bit of this), to “Look the game is old and from a different time, what society deems acceptable is always changing, deal with it or move on.”
I’m so beyond tired of being told I can’t have a steak because a baby can’t chew it. I actually bought this three pack solely because it didn’t censor Tomb Raider, a game I was very sure they were going to censor
samus12345@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Like they did with Sam & Max
I had to look that one up since I had no recollection of anything that stood out as offensive. Most seemed silly to change to me, but I do agree with changing the line about the goggles being designed for special needs children after Sam referred to Max’s “hideously oversized skull.”
HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Sam & Max didn’t cause that much of a fuss because all purchases of it came with the original version of the game, but the censoring was still cringe.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Genuinely struggling to remember what that could even be about.
I mean, it’s been like 25 years since I played them, but I don’t recall any obviously bad things in there. It’s not like it was filled with old Jackie Chan film levels of cartoon racism.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 months ago
The voice acting has quite a range of stereotyped accents. Nothing they say is overtly racist, but the over the top accents themselves sure are.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Oh, OK. So more George Lucas than Tintin in the Congo.
HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
I think there were some “jungle tribe” type enemies somewhere but don’t quote me on that
HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 months ago
In Tomb Raider 3 an antagonist faction includes black men who want to eat Laura, and not in the same way I do if you catch my meaning.
PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I haven’t played it but that doesn’t sound racist to me if the context is right. There are cannibal tribes today. They are black skinned. This is fact.
KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
This is perfectly fine, its how they did it for the old Looney Tunes DVDs.
MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
And is what they should do rather than trying to delete it.
Provide context so that future generations can enjoy what’s good about the media and acknowledge how parts of the content/media are problematic and not appropriate.
pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Something I and probably everyone else forgets is that Looney Tunes was made in the 1930s and 1940s, not the 1990s.
moon@lemmy.cafe 8 months ago
Much better then censoring the original content. Should also give a warning for dangerously sharp tiddies!
lud@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Doesn’t the remaster smooth out the breasts? Looks like it.
yamanii@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You can toggle it like Hallo Anniversary.
Thcdenton@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Shadywack@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Do you want to wash wang, or watch Wang, wash wang?
samus12345@lemmy.world 8 months ago
WHOOOO want-a some Wang?
merthyr1831@lemmy.world 8 months ago
didn’t need to be news does it?
Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 8 months ago
No but they have to make it news before some teenager who just learned about virtue signalling goes off on one because their mum paid more attention to Candy Crush than them
yamanii@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m glad they did that, change on a remake or something, I don’t recall if they actually did it for Anniversary since it was still a ps2 game, but if games are art they should be preserved as they were, this is just a remaster that you can even play with the old graphics if you want.
dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
Isn’t this what the ESRB rating description is for? We label games M for Mature if there’s swearing, blood, violence, and sex, but not for insensitive cultural stereotypes?
Ilflish@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Neat, I’m with everyone here when I say this is the much better solution.I’d prefer it to be a bit more clear of a warning and a bit less of a company apology so people who do need the warnings such as younger kids are informed and not immediately put off by playing something almost immediately presented as ‘inexcusable’.
callouscomic@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Ermahgerd! Why dey gutta ram politics into mah games, they’re ruining my heritage or something I dunno, rabble rabble!!!
/s for the morons
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m a fan of this. It’s better to offer content with context and education than to fully censor it.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 8 months ago
100% this is the way things should be handled. If we get rid of or hide mistakes of the past, they will simply be repeated as people forget.
A note about historical context is an easy, and small solution to acknowledge the change in society without altering the original content.
9715698@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Metal Gear Solid Master Collection did this as well.
dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
What did they have to provide context for in the Master Collection?