chemical_cutthroat
@chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
- Comment on Hello GPT-4o 5 days ago:
It’s an end-user plateau for the moment, but there are still tons of things going on underneath the hood. From the outside it may not look like things are moving, but we’ve gone from Model-T to Chevy Bel Air fairly quickly, and while the difference is huge, the engineers are still trying to get us to Bugatti Veyron level. Until then, we are going to have a long “80 and 90s” period of sameness.
- Comment on Ideas 2 weeks ago:
Who died and made you… Oh.
- Comment on Ideas 2 weeks ago:
If the name was actually Napoleon, or if it used the traditional French recipe in the image to mimic the flag, I would give it a pass as a good shit post, but it’s Neapolitan, and it’s using the American recipe, so it’s not even tangentially funny. It’s just a bad shit post, and not in a good way. Sorry chief, try again.
- Comment on Ideas 2 weeks ago:
This is just inaccurate…
- Comment on There can only be one! 2 weeks ago:
I’d lose my mind if the doctor regenerated and Picardo walked out… “Please state the nature of your medical emergency.”
- Comment on Tell me what it smells like in the comments! 2 weeks ago:
Updoots to the left
- Comment on Academic Rizzlers 2 weeks ago:
Fancy memes
- Comment on Peace was never an option 2 weeks ago:
Leeeerrrroooooyyyyy…
- Comment on Stuck 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on high energy 2 weeks ago:
True, you are exhausting me, and I don’t think it is a talent you’ve acquired. Likely you were born with it.
- Comment on high energy 2 weeks ago:
The sign literally says “Making an effort.”
- Comment on high energy 2 weeks ago:
I’m looking at that list like, damn, that’s exhausting.
- Comment on NEW JOB! 3 weeks ago:
The sky’s the limit!
- Comment on Former Yakima police officer arrested for raping sleeping 16-year-old 3 weeks ago:
Is this the Amber Alert I got yesterday? Holy shit. I’m glad the kid is OK.
- Comment on Astronauts To Patch Up NASA’s NICER Telescope 4 weeks ago:
Finally, we’ll have the NICEST telescope.
- Comment on We can do better. 4 weeks ago:
They can do better. I’m done taking the blame for the last 3 generation’s fuck ups. I’ve spent my life making up for their shortcomings and all it’s gotten me is two roommates, an increased bus fare, and a credit score that means more than my GPA.
- Comment on You did it. The crazy son of a bitch, you did it. 5 weeks ago:
Where the fuck are they getting Topo Chico from? Fucking Mars?
- Comment on Please hold 5 weeks ago:
I was gonna say the same thing. I got to tier two sprint tech support (which is just tier one with a hold time) and I was always making food in my cubicle. I didn’t eat during lunch, I just did laps around the building to work off all the shit I ate while I was on calls.
- Comment on AI will reduce workforce, say 41% of execs in a survey 5 weeks ago:
You know what I love about blocking people?
- Comment on AI will reduce workforce, say 41% of execs in a survey 5 weeks ago:
“Workforce” doesn’t produce innovation, either. It does the labor. AI is great at doing the labor. It excels in mindless, repetitive tasks. AI won’t be replacing the innovators, it will be replacing the desk jockeys that do nothing but update spreadsheets or write code. What I predict we’ll see is the floor dropping out of technical schools that teach the things that AI will be replacing. We are looking at the last generation of code monkeys. People joke about how bad AI is at writing code, but give it the same length of time as a graduate program and see where it is. Hell, ChatGPT has only been around since June of 2020 and that was the beta (just 13 years after the first iPhone, and look how far smartphones have come). There won’t be a huge demand for workforce in 5 years, there will be a huge portion of the population that suddenly won’t have a job. It won’t be like the agricultural or industrial revolution where it takes time to make it’s way around the world, or where this is some demand for artisanal goods. No one wants artisanal spreadsheets, and we are too global now to not outsource our work to the lowest bidder with the highest thread count. It will happen nearly overnight, and if the world’s governments aren’t prepared, we’ll see an unemployment crisis like never before. We’re still in “Fuck around.” “Find out” is just around the corner, though.
- Comment on Ringleader of global monkey torture network, 'The Torture King', is charged 1 month ago:
It’s Ice Cube, but I get your meaning.
- Comment on Ringleader of global monkey torture network, 'The Torture King', is charged 1 month ago:
That picture. Jesus Christ. In 20 years there will be studies on all of the red flags people willfully ignored.
- Comment on the internet 1 month ago:
To make matters worse, it was loaded with a bio-organic payload that is mostly hydrogen and oxygen, both of which are incredibly volatile.
- Comment on the internet 1 month ago:
Probably whether or not the ship was loaded with jet fuel or something…
- Comment on Taylor Swift among 141 new billionaires in ‘amazing year for rich people’ 1 month ago:
Damn. You got me there. Guess I shouldn’t complain.
- Comment on Taylor Swift among 141 new billionaires in ‘amazing year for rich people’ 1 month ago:
When was the last good year for poor people? Anyone? Bueller?
- Comment on Woman removed from Delta flight over 'too revealing' clothing, calls for policy change 1 month ago:
Regardless, neither have anything to do with the fact that a nipple, regardless of gender, does not have the potential to kill you, and the whataboutism is cute but off topic.
That wasn’t “whataboutism”, I was comparing two things that are the same, but are viewed differently by society. Your bad faith arguments just won’t let you admit to it, but let’s continue.
what is the difference between a man’s nipple and a woman’s? Because you’ve yet to answer my, or anyone’s, question.
I haven’t because you make the argument in bad faith. You know that I know the difference, I know that you know the difference, but no matter what I say, you’ll tell me that I’m wrong. However, for the sake of answering your question, sure, I’ll tell you.
Biologically: Both sexes have nipples because early in the womb we were all the same gender before we got the ol’ switcharoo that we were born with. Nipples were formed before your dick/vagina, and they stuck around afterwards instead of falling off. In the female of mammalian species, the female nipple facilitates breast feeding.
Sexually: In many societies and cultures, the female nipple is viewed as an object of sexual desire (see: every ratings board, ever), and thus, is typically obstructed from view based on the cultural in which the woman is present. Even in places where it is completely legal for women to walk around topless (like where I live) it is still culturally appropriate to wear something that covers them. The easiest way to give an example that offers a repeatable outcome is to post two pictures in this thread, one of a male chest, and the other of a female, both nude. The female will get removed by the automod.
Men, hands down, are the more violent and aggressive of a species, and make many people uncomfortable to be around. Do we get to ban men from public spaces because they are encroaching on the personal freedoms of those who are made uncomfortable by them?
There are laws for that, yes, though they are not targeted directly at men, they affect them disproportionately. Some examples being loud, rowdy men at a bar are seen as a nuisance, where as loud, rowdy women are just having a girls night out. I’m not saying there is a real difference, but culturally, that is how it is seen a lot of the time. I can give many, many more examples, but I’m not going to waste my time on a battle of the sexes.
Or are you just going to respond that those who are uncomfortable around an entire gender need therapy or professional help?
Nope.
Or should they just uproot their entire lives, as you seem to suggest, and move to a country with no men? Oh, they don’t exist? Funny, since the vast majority of people have nipples, and last I checked, a nipple has never raped or killed anyone.
I think you had a point when you started that thought, but it got lost somewhere along the way, and now it makes no sense. Sorry, I can’t find a way to respond to it.
Since you seem to like to take arguments to the extreme or compare them to things like unregulated and regulated meat, what’s your take on that?
Take on what? Sex and violence? I don’t need to make the argument on difference there. There are many cultures that have a different view of the two than the American view.
Either way, I’m done with these arguments. All of you, and truly, I mean all of you have been making bad faith arguments simply to virtue signal. Not a single person here has made a good argument as to why a woman with her tits showing through her shirt should have been allowed on a family flight where she was showing more than could be shown on network television. Call her persecutors prudes or whatever, but rules are rules, and if you don’t like them, you try to change them. Admittedly, that is what she seems to be doing, but in the most narcissistic way possible, which doesn’t really help her case.
- Comment on Woman removed from Delta flight over 'too revealing' clothing, calls for policy change 1 month ago:
If it was a societal norm. Jesus Christ you all make some of the worst most paper thin arguments.
- Comment on Woman removed from Delta flight over 'too revealing' clothing, calls for policy change 1 month ago:
There, that’s basically the shirt, but without the pockets. Mesh isn’t the right word, but it get’s the point across. You can clearly see through it.
- Comment on Woman removed from Delta flight over 'too revealing' clothing, calls for policy change 1 month ago:
The picture she posted. If you look at the shirt under the jacket you can see that it is a mesh shirt that you can see any douchebag in a club wearing. You can clearly see her torso through it, and if she has taken the picture from a different perspective and without the jacket, her tits would clearly be visible.