Question inspired by the image (see attached)
There’s an entire code block for hieroglyphs in Unicode. symbl.cc/en/unicode/blocks/egyptian-hieroglyphs/
Amusingly penis features in a few of them. symbl.cc/en/130B8/
Is there a chart where particular cuneiform or hieroglyphics are actually matched with emojis?
Submitted 10 months ago by Lafari@lemmy.world to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d43136df-20ae-46a2-bafd-4426aa068349.jpeg
Comments
zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
BoBTFish@kbin.social 10 months ago
Specifically in the "D parts of the human body" section?! Is there a "V parts..." section as well?
zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Not that I’m aware of only ‘penis’, ‘penis with emission’, and ‘penis with folded cloth’.
This link has the descriptions unicode-explorer.com/c/130B9
Nemo@midwest.social 10 months ago
Well that’s cool as hell!
florge@feddit.uk 10 months ago
So that’s where that penis comes from
synapse1278@lemmy.world 10 months ago
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 10 months ago
BoBTFish@kbin.social 10 months ago
Specifically in the "D parts of the human body" section?! Is there a "V parts..." section as well?
dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
𓉘
𓉘 𓉛
𓉘 𓉝
𓉘 𓉐
(𓀐𓀓) 𓂊
RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
Ah god damnit
scarabic@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Of course this isn’t comparable - hieroglyphs form complete languages and are not just a set of emotion symbols. Probably there’s one or two that are emotions but I somehow doubt that the stone writings that endure contain any personal expressions of emotion.
But the post is funny and it hints at something important. Expressions to co vey emotion are incredibly important to human beings. It’s a language that our bodies are physically built for: our faces are far more changeable and expressive than other animals, and this supported the social bonds and cooperation that put us on top of the world. I’m not saying that across all cultures, one given facial expression means the same thing, but certainly all cultures have a vivid, silent language of facial expressions that is so deeply rooted, we barely think about it.
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
hieroglyphs form complete languages and are not just a set of emotion symbols. Probably there’s one or two that are emotions but I somehow doubt that the stone writings that endure contain any personal expressions of emotion.
Emoji don’t just depict emotions…
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
i mean most emojis aren’t emotions, they’re just… things…
what emotion does a bus have? the joy of not having to sit in traffic?
scarabic@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Yes there’s a long list of country flags and currency symbols and other shit in there too but lets not pretend like adding all that crap changed the fact that these are commonly used for expression. Does a cup of coffee have an emotion? Actually it kinda can, yeah, in the right situation. Let’s not even get into what people make of eggplants and popcorn tubs.
at_an_angle@lemmy.one 10 months ago
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Meanwhile in China they never stopped using hieroglyphics (cries while loading up more 中文 Duolingo and Lingodeer)
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 months ago
[deleted]Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Sadly we don’t have the exact modern equivalent 😔🍆💦
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Did someone delete my comment? 𓀨
don@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Back?! lol Homie, it never really stopped. Modern humanity’s about 300,000 years old and we’ve been using various forms of cuneiform and hyroglyphics since waaaaay before even Akkadian was a thing lol
Venat0r@lemmy.world 10 months ago
They went out of style for awhile when the printing press was invented.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 months ago
👁️🐦🌊☀️
Deceptichum@kbin.social 10 months ago
Eyebirdwaveson?
How dare you call me that.
phorq@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
I refuse to use emojis, you can’t make me! 😤
TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I still use emoticons
lledrtx@lemmy.world 10 months ago
To answer your question on matching emojis, no, it is way more complex than that. For example check the use cases of this one - en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Hill-country_(hieroglyph)
jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
This is amazing. I never knew that Egyptian hieroglyphs had names for kingdoms in the Indian subcontinent.
HappyPenguinos@ani.social 10 months ago
𓂀. CrDroid logo
cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Eye of Horus. Was one of my fave high school doodles.
hakase@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Writing isn’t language, otherwise the thousands of unwritten languages wouldn’t be considered languages.
rosymind@leminal.space 10 months ago
Idk. I think they can all fall under language, because they’re all a form of communication. Like sign language, or body language
hakase@lemm.ee 10 months ago
That depends on your definition of “language”, where some definitions are much more scientifically useful than others. Under the definition used by most linguists (for the kind of object we’re talking about here, that is - there are many other relevant objects of study that can be called a “language”), spoken/signed human languages have all of the characteristics of language, while “body language”/animal “languages” do not.
Sign language is language, since it has a grammar that meets all of the characteristics above, and writing is not considered language, since it’s just a means of encoding/preserving a language that already exists.
Another way of stating this is that writing is not itself the output of a mental grammar - it’s the output of a translation algorithm that acts on the output of a grammar, and so can’t be considered language itself (again, under one of the most common definitions of “language” used in the scientific study of human language).
BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 10 months ago
I think its more like writing is language, but language isn’t necessarily writing.
hakase@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Writing isn’t language at all, for reasons discussed in my comments below.
Which is part of what makes linguistics work on ancient languages so difficult - we’re having to use these imperfect symbols, which themselves aren’t language, to try to glean as many features about the actual grammars they’re intended to represent, which are language.
This is why we know much less about ancient languages than we do modern ones - because we have actual recordings of modern languages (the recordings themselves are also not language, of course; they just encode language much better than writing does), so we can get at many more features of the language in question.
Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Ok, strictly speaking, the language is called the Egyptian language and hieroglyphs were the writing system used to write it (until Greek influences evolved it into Coptic). But that’s an extremely pedantic distinction to anyone who isn’t a linguist.
rar@discuss.online 10 months ago
It’s not that simple, cuneiform and hyeroglyphs had been accompanied by sophisticated systems representing phonemes and grammar elements of the languages it was being written with. People make the same mistakes regarding chinese characters (older scripts or more “primitive” scripts equated to simple drawings and nothing else). 🤷
sagrotan@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Hieroglyphs are actually not that simple, my ex gf was an Egyptologist, I went to quite a few lectures with her, that was a highly complex language, more akin to Japanese Kanji, with deep layered subtexts. Those desert dudes were crazy. If you have ever have a chance to visit a lecture about hieroglyphs, do it, it’ll blow your mind. Or how they calculated time, or even saw it, culturally and individually, wow. They were so unbelievably far ahead, I sometimes compare them to the octopus of human development, they should rule the world, but there was that one thing, that prevented it. (For the analogy: the octopus dies when their kids are hatching, would they have the ability to pass their knowledge along to them, today eight armed space suits would be en Vogue)
folkrav@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
It’s incredibly easy to fall into the trap of seeing modern societies as more advanced. There’s no reason to think they weren’t just as intelligent and resourceful as we are today. They just lived a long time ago. If history can teach us one thing, it’s that nobody rules the world forever, as advanced a civilization can be.
KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Prior to collapsing, Rome achieved a sustained population in excess of a million people.
This did not occur again anywhere else until the mid 1800s.
AmidFuror@kbin.social 10 months ago
I don't agree with how you seem to be defining "advanced." You seem to be tying that to intelligence and resourcefulness, as opposed to culturally. I think most use it to talk about the sum of knowledge and technology that a civilization has.
While ancient cultures were able to learn a lot about the world around them, today we know what they knew and a shit ton more. They figured out how planets and stars move. We've figured out what they're made of, how they bend space and time, their distances. We've landed machines on some and put them in orbit around others.
They had some cool medical tricks. We have many complex but routine surgeries with high survival rates due to development of drugs, equipment, and sterile environments.
They could write down their learnings to share with others of their culture. We have a global network of scientists sharing massive data sets and inferences.
Their innate capabilities were probably no different than our own, but we have massively advanced the scale and scope of learning shared with each generation. We have a much greater degree of specialized knowledge advancing and branching out at a very high rate.
c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 10 months ago
We had to develop sapience at some point, but I’d guess it was closer to when we invented cooking than writing. Egypt isn’t even that old by the standards of the human race.
evatronic@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Based on the planet’s climate trajectory, humanity may not rule it forever, but we’re aiming to be the last.
TheBlackLounge@lemmy.world 10 months ago
What held the Egyptians back?
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Their spines
yamanii@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Probably the bronze age collapse, quite a scary event that extinguished trade routes and literacy.
www.wikiwand.com/en/Late_Bronze_Age_collapse
synapse1278@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I bet it was hangover!
Lemjukes@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Does watching stargate count?
rdyoung@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m going to have to say yes.
scarabic@lemmy.world 10 months ago
And what was “that one thing” for the Egyptians?