Jokes on you, my printers are 100% opensource and I program them with the code I want.
Submitted 10 hours ago by ExtremeDullard@piefed.social to 3dprinting@lemmy.world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-9ISzMhBM
Comments
infinitevalence@discuss.online 8 hours ago
Agent641@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Get on the ground, hands behind your back! Bang bang bang bang bang!
KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
Yup, we got another suicide on our hands…
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 9 hours ago
That Washington state, not DC.
Surveillance capitalism and the fascists always find a way to debase everything good that people like.
hector@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
They haven’t stopped at printers, they have everything now constructed to spy. Even a lot of things that have no legitimate purpose being connected to the internet. Soon we will not be able to find the non “smart” devices. We can’t take batteries out of electronics that can spy on us anymore. It’s a federal felony now to alter the programming on an electronic you bought as well.
DemBoSain@midwest.social 8 hours ago
Washington state.
LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 hours ago
Heeeeeyyyyyy. I have a k1c with cfs, is there open source support? I’m dumb, I like the printer, and the cfs is alright. Not thrilled about the opaque software and definitely not thrilled with ‘cloud intrgration’
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 8 hours ago
I have a Prusa XL, and the reason is, Prusa is (still) mostly open-source. And quite frankly it’s the only reason why I stick with Prusa, because technically they’re behind the curve.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
Same. Still like their support and community too. It’s not so far behind that I feel like it’s a compromise to the point where I can get it to do everything I want it to do. I’m paying for my open source preference and the support / community instead of the most modern fancy features. I want both, but I’d still choose the former especially when the latter seems to involve more and more privacy infringement.
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
I don’t get why they insist on sticking to their own somewhat inferior software platform when a good, 100% open source, and better performing alternative exists with klipper.
spitfire@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 hours ago
🩷🩷🩷I’ll check it out! Thanks so much!
paf@jlai.lu 7 hours ago
Am I understanding this bill wrong? (Not English native)
This is bill is about blocking ability to print firearms related stuff and not about spying customers?
eRac@lemmings.world 7 hours ago
How do you block firearm parts at the printer level without analyzing and judging the files a user provides?
Even if this was possible (it’s not), most printers don’t have the kind of processing power needed to reverse slicing back into the solid object so that it can be compared with banned parts. They’d either have to put in much larger computers and spike the cost per unit or do it server-side and be always-online.
altphoto@lemmy.today 5 hours ago
This is exactly correct. Its like these people are not giving it one thought.
There are two bills one says to not sell to criminals and to not allow them to operate the machines…hmm okay…
Hey, I’m selling my Bridgeport!
Hey I want to buy it!
Are you a Felon?
No
Prove it, please fill out this application form so we can send it off to the government for review.
No thanks!
Wait so are you a Felon or just because its stupid and intrusive?
Stupid and intrusive!
Okay thanks!
Hold on, my raspberry pi just got done comparing the model to one of a million different barrels. This will take a while…
Ten years later…
The new raspberry pi 34 can do 3 comparisons per day! And on just 10mW! Wow!
paf@jlai.lu 6 hours ago
I totally agree with you, like always politician have an idea but don’t even state how to realise it… So possibly this will actually never happen.
One thing that come to my mind is that manufacturer could maybe use some kind of hash database of firearms related files. While printer are not very powerful, that’s something that could be done on slicer but that would mean the death of open source software (at least in USA) as to implement this every manufacturer would need to force customer using their slicer. Also, wondering how much power demanding it is for printer to recreate solid object, could they just read gcode to analyse object? and since guns are not 25cmx25cm square, it’s not like this would take ages to analyse.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 minute ago
O just love that true one single product bthat allows you to replicate itself in an open non spy way now must have spyware.
Politicians are idiots