WoodScientist
@WoodScientist@lemmy.world
- Comment on Patrick Stewart Reflects on 'Star Trek' at 60: Why He Wants More Spinoffs 3 days ago:
What if it was primarily from the perspective of the new Lower Deckers?
- Comment on Patrick Stewart Reflects on 'Star Trek' at 60: Why He Wants More Spinoffs 3 days ago:
Fuck it. Let’s take this in a strange direction.
Give me Star Trek HGN. It’s a live show featuring a guy in full Ferengi make up hawking actual items you can buy, each either an actual piece of Trek merchandise or some oddity or curio that can be passed off as some interstellar artifact.
- Comment on I could go for that right now 5 days ago:
Eh, it’s laudable.
- Comment on I could go for that right now 5 days ago:
- Comment on "Oopsie" 2 weeks ago:
I mean, eventually, he can improve by repetition if nothing else. I mean, wasn’t he objectively one of the most experienced executioners in modern history?
- Comment on "Oopsie" 2 weeks ago:
There’s an old saying. “Anyone can build a bridge that stands up. It takes an engineer to design a bridge that will barely stand up.”
Some may say that the hangman was clearly incompetent. Others might say he was actually the most skilled at his craft on this Earth, simply….optimizing for a different variable.
- Comment on Why the fuck do people post photos of text instead of just text? 3 weeks ago:
It’s not inefficient, it’s extraordinarily efficient.
There are efficiencies and then there are relative efficiencies. You could design a combustion engine that used its intake air very efficiently, but as our supply of atmospheric oxygen is effectively limitless, it would be completely irrelevant. No one is ever going to care how efficient their car is at managing its oxygen use.
Posting images of text is not cheap in terms of computer resources, but it’s extraordinarily efficient in terms of human time. A quick screen shot, a box to select, and you’re done. Sure, you could just as quickly copy the text of a tweet or other message, but you would also be cutting out important details. If you want to include the source’s username, the site it came from, the profile picture, etc., each of these has to be gathered separately. Then they have to be pasted into a text entry box, as well as any images. Oh, and it won’t actually end up being formatted like it was on the original site.
People post text as images for the exact same reason we invented computers in the first place - human convenience and time savings. If you want to post text that preserves its original context and source, it is almost always easier to just post a screen shot than it is to manually copy all that information over piecemeal. Yes, posting the text directly is more resource efficient, but that’s pretty irrelevant in 2026. You do have points on the translation though. And of course it does make it harder for screen readers.
But there’s your answer. Convenience.
- Comment on How the mighty have fallen 😭 3 weeks ago:
Why the change? August 6, 1945.