I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
Out of 10. Be specific!
Submitted 5 weeks ago by ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world to [deleted]
https://media.piefed.world/posts/7D/C6/7DC6jPk9fFyYAbN.webp
Comments
Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
db2@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Knork/10
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 5 weeks ago
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 weeks ago
This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.
8/10.
_stranger_@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
- I hate it, but it appears functional
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
shalafi@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Also good for oysters!
Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.
Probably good for getting olives out of jars.
hansolo@lemmy.today 5 weeks ago
Why TF is Lemmy’s nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?
I mean, that’s half of mine. How did we get here?
tamal3@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Bricks? I’ve seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.
hansolo@lemmy.today 5 weeks ago
It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon’s brother hates cement and cement blocks.
RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 5 weeks ago
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 5 weeks ago
Yes, that's technically allowed.
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Because that fork has trisomy 21.
kwilson@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I’d give it a perfect 5/7
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 weeks ago
I rate everything like Jason from The Good Place, a 1 to 13 scale with 8 as the highest. I give this a 10.
Nalivai@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Number five is number one. Number seven is number two. Number three and number four are tied for number three.
GoddessGundy@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.
untorquer@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.
piefood@feddit.online 5 weeks ago
It looks like someone made a fork based on a kids drawing of a fork
Badabinski@kbin.earth 5 weeks ago
backscratcher/10
jim3692@discuss.online 5 weeks ago
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That’s not a fork that’s a thnork
Nariom@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
5/7
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn’t even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where’s the banana for scale?
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 5 weeks ago
lunarul@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That’s somehow worse
Kabulanolac@piefed.social 5 weeks ago
It looks like a Botero painting
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
- It’s not a good spork
falynns@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
3/10. Not great, Bob.
icelimit@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
I like the 3 increasing gaps in the tines.
8/10 dessert fork conversation piece.
Also stealthy stabby. Might hide in a hidden emergency drawer.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Pretentious restaurant/10. They’re going to serve you bubbles or pour chocolate sauce on your hands or some dumb shit.
hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Certainly less than a full 4.
HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
-2/10
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Zero thousand.
affenlehrer@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
More practical than many Star Trek forks
Wutchilli@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
3/10 Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand. But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head. Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved. But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick. And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead.
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Quadhammer@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Looks like Barts older cousin