Out of 10. Be specific!

Comments

• Mrkawfee@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson

  source

  • Quadhammer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Looks like Barts older cousin

    source
• Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10

  source
• DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10

  source
• ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.

  source
• db2@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Knork/10

  source

  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Not specific but technically follows the set rating system

    source
• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.

  8/10.

  source
• _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  2. I hate it, but it appears functional

  source
• SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Crab Fork

  8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.

  source

  • shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Also good for oysters!

    source
• Professorozone@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.

  Probably good for getting olives out of jars.

  source
• hansolo@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why TF is Lemmy’s nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?

  I mean, that’s half of mine. How did we get here?

  source

  • tamal3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Bricks? I’ve seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.

    source

    • hansolo@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon’s brother hates cement and cement blocks.

      lemmy.today/post/36312407

      source
• RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  3.145183813819291837

  Specific enough?

  source

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I guess but I’d prefer a rational answer.

    source

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That is a rational number

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yes, that's technically allowed.

    source
• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Because that fork has trisomy 21.

  source
• kwilson@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’d give it a perfect 5/7

  source
• Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I rate everything like Jason from The Good Place, a 1 to 13 scale with 8 as the highest. I give this a 10.

  source

  • Nalivai@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Number five is number one. Number seven is number two. Number three and number four are tied for number three.

    source
• GoddessGundy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.

  I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.

  source

  • untorquer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.

    source
• piefood@feddit.online ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It looks like someone made a fork based on a kids drawing of a fork

  source
• Badabinski@kbin.earth ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  backscratcher/10

  source
• jim3692@discuss.online ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I prefer this one. Way more area in the handle for better grip.

  Image

  source

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That’s not a fork that’s a thnork

    source
• Nariom@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  5/7

  source

  • rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Perfect.

    source

    • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      100%

      source
• trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn’t even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where’s the banana for scale?

  source

  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • lunarul@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s somehow worse

      source
    • Kabulanolac@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It looks like a Botero painting

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  1. It’s not a good spork

  source
• falynns@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  3/10. Not great, Bob.

  source
• icelimit@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I like the 3 increasing gaps in the tines.

  8/10 dessert fork conversation piece.

  Also stealthy stabby. Might hide in a hidden emergency drawer.

  source
• captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Pretentious restaurant/10. They’re going to serve you bubbles or pour chocolate sauce on your hands or some dumb shit.

  source
• hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Certainly less than a full 4.

  source
• HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  -2/10

  source
• monk@lemmy.unboiled.info ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  8/10. -4 for unneeded weight, -3 for asymmetry making prongs short, +5 for actually sharp prongs. Looking at you, every other “fork” out there you.

  source
• caseyweederman@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Zero thousand.

  source
• affenlehrer@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  More practical than many Star Trek forks

  source