Looks like it has good mouth-feel. As a fidget toy, 5/10; as a fork, 2/10
Out of 10. Be specific!
Submitted 8 months ago by ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world to [deleted]
https://media.piefed.world/posts/7D/C6/7DC6jPk9fFyYAbN.webp
Comments
TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
zululove@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
You like a good mouthfeel don’t cha
burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
4/10.
Great for its intended use, but performs very poorly at some fork functions.
piefood@feddit.online 8 months ago
It looks like someone made a fork based on a kids drawing of a fork
rmuk@feddit.uk 8 months ago
4k
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
I rate everything like Jason from The Good Place, a 1 to 13 scale with 8 as the highest. I give this a 10.
Nalivai@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Number five is number one. Number seven is number two. Number three and number four are tied for number three.
Nariom@lemmy.world 8 months ago
5/7
Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Zero thousand.
owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Dali/10
affenlehrer@feddit.org 8 months ago
More practical than many Star Trek forks
Badabinski@kbin.earth 8 months ago
backscratcher/10
Wutchilli@feddit.org 8 months ago
3/10 Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand. But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head. Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved. But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick. And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead.
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Quadhammer@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Looks like Barts older cousin
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
shalafi@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Also good for oysters!
hansolo@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Why TF is Lemmy’s nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?
I mean, that’s half of mine. How did we get here?
tamal3@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Bricks? I’ve seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.
hansolo@lemmy.today 8 months ago
It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon’s brother hates cement and cement blocks.
HikingVet@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
-2/10
Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
4/10, not for the unique tines but for the bulbous and tapered handle. Not as comfortable to hold and use as your standard fork.
RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 8 months ago
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
Typhoon@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
I guess but I’d prefer a rational answer.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
That is a rational number
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 8 months ago
Yes, that's technically allowed.
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn’t even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where’s the banana for scale?
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 8 months ago
lunarul@lemmy.world 8 months ago
That’s somehow worse
Kabulanolac@piefed.social 8 months ago
It looks like a Botero painting
db2@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Knork/10
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 8 months ago
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Certainly less than a full 4.