Out of 10. Be specific!

Comments

• Wutchilli@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  3/10 Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand. But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head. Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved. But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick. And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead.

  source
• Stillwater@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  4/10, not for the unique tines but for the bulbous and tapered handle. Not as comfortable to hold and use as your standard fork.

  source
• Donkter@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Excellent for pokin’ olives. 7/10

  source

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I was gonna say eyes

    source
• kinther@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Gonna be a 3/10 from me dawg

  source
• MeatPilot@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That looks like a fork at a snooty restaurant where they try to convince you that this fork is better than regular fork. Because you experience the chefs childhood struggles as you try scoop up your cashew foam and baked stick.

  source
• rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  4k

  source
• owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Dali/10

  source
• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  shove it up your ass/10

  source
• olafurp@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Will-stab-my-eye-out-to-never-see-it-again/10

  source
• MTK@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  7/10

  Would suck for most situations but would excel in a few specific situations

  source
• orenj@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  8/10. While inneficient in material usage, its streamlined form and unique silhouette should make it easy to clean and find if one of the fam accidentally takes it home.

  source
• DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I like my forks like I like my women, thick and tall. I rate this fork 10/10.

  source
• Toes@ani.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Looks pretty standard to me

  source
• Siegfried@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  5 because it at least appears to do the job

  source
• tryagain@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Doesn’t matter what the scale is: it’s still zero.

  source

  • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Joke’s on you, the scale is from 3 to 17.

    source
• TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Looks like it has good mouth-feel. As a fidget toy, 5/10; as a fork, 2/10

  source

  • zululove@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You like a good mouthfeel don’t cha

    source
• burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  4/10.

  Great for its intended use, but performs very poorly at some fork functions.

  source
• untorquer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Something about the shape tells me this will be a 10/10 x-ray during an emergency room visit.

  source
• Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  4 out of 5 prongs.

  source
• TastyWheat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Tines are uneven, 4/10

  source
• dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I am particular about forks and spoons, preferring they are thin and relatively straight - this fork looks too thick, but I don’t mind how narrow it is

  source
• And009@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  5.67/10

  source