My husband (67) officially retired last year, and we currently live in a town about 15 miles outside of Boston. It’s a great spot - close enough to the city for all the conveniences, but still with some space and nature around us. Since retiring, he’s gotten really into the idea of moving to the countryside permanently. He’s been browsing properties in the middle of nowhere in Wyoming and is basically dreaming of a rancher lifestyle. And don’t get me wrong - I have nothing against rural living. I actually like it. But he’s not exactly young anymore.

Right now, he’s in great shape - active, healthy, sharp. But things can change fast, and that’s what worries me. Out here near Boston, we’ve got excellent medical care just a short drive away. That’s not the case in rural Wyoming. If something were to happen, help might be hours away. I’m not especially concerned for myself - I’m younger and fine with adapting. But for him, I can’t help thinking this could be risky. So yeah, that’s why I’m not on board with the whole move-to-the-middle-of-nowhere plan. Does that make me unreasonable?