Don’t people realize there are hundreds of free porn video sites besides Pornhub? With bigger selection too because the smaller sites usually don’t get DMCAed.
VPN Registrations Increase by 1,000%, less than Hour After PornHub Blocked France From Accessing its Website.
Submitted 1 day ago by Pro@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world
https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/d3870309-2164-4e55-82b0-82ffb7affee7.jpeg
Comments
bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.kya.moe 1 hour ago
List them or it didn’t happen
please
bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
yourmom.com
Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I have to admit, of all the nations on earth, I never expected this sort of puritanical theatrical authoritarianism out of the french.
FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 day ago
They’ve been trying to block it for many years now.
France has been going downhill for quite some time. Many proposals for chat control and tracking… even recently, we got a law proposal that aimed at banning E2EE 😵
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Damn, the whole world really is going authoritarian.
chunes@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Politicians are always trying to ban encryption in every country. I remember it happening constantly in the 90s. And it happens because politicians don’t understand that you can’t ban math
NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
They should actually take to the streets (again). Not joking. What is this nanny-state BS?
Vermingot@jlai.lu 1 day ago
To clarify, the french didn’t ban pornhub, it’s the company behind pornhub who decided to deny it’s access in France to protest a law proposal that is currently getting examined in parliament
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Ps : The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users
This is how young boys learn to computer. It won’t do shit to stop anything. It’s a waste of time.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 day ago
The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users
Wait aren’t they proposing the same thing in the US as well? It’s a fairly standard thing of right-wing governments to just demand the impossible with no understanding about it could possibly be achieved.
ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users
Isn’t that already the case on a lot of the internet?
HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 1 day ago
I know right? Aren’t there nude beaches in the south of France where people will fuck in broad daylight with others watching?
French citizens please confirm (for ugh science, and not vacation planning)!
BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Yes, there are. But you misunderstood the news: France didn’t block pornhub, pornhub blocked France as a protest against a new law.
NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Democracy and general Egalitarianism is so 2008.
Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I can’t wait for a severe overcorrection
FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 17 hours ago
Democracy and general Egalitarianism is so 2008
Bold of you to assume it ever was!
MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The percentages of respondents in surveys on infidelity from France are a bit of a cultural difference (from Australian perspective, anyway)
Object@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Blocking porn has got to be the most “why even bother” thing
Etterra@discuss.online 1 day ago
Political theater. “Won’t somebody think of the children?” is an easy win for politicians.
pyrflie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
Anytime I hear someone say this, I think they are a pedophile.
If you actually believe this about a situation don’t say these words cause that’s what comes to mind.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Except it’s fucking awful to wait for buffering over Tor or a VPN
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
It’s not about blocking porn.
It’s always about control. Conservatives want to control how you consume sexual content.
Fermion@feddit.nl 1 day ago
It’s not about that either. It’s about connecting photo ID to browsing profiles and deanonymising the internet.
Schmoo@startrek.website 1 day ago
VPN companies and data brokers have a financial incentive to lobby for intrusive age-verification and restrictions, and prudish politicians are conveniently present in every political system. The porn lobby is powerful, but it seems they’ve been losing this battle recently. Or maybe they’re cutting deals with the data brokers, who knows.
shalafi@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Politically speaking, it’s easy money. You pander to the conservatives with blocking propositions, get votes.
*Who is going to champion the flip side?!"
Liz@midwest.social 1 day ago
Me. Porn is fine. Teach your children how to handle it. Teach them that it’s not realistic and some of it is straight-up dangerous. Put a filter on your internet if you’re too scared to talk to your kids about uncomfortable topics.
FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 day ago
Like Reddit or YouTube with proper keywords didn’t exist
Been there, done that
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Reminds me of when my buddies discovered our friend’s YouTube account… He only had one public playlist, and it was 100% full of softcore porn. Nothing else. It was all softcore porn. We gave him a pretty good ribbing for that one, and still make a point of reminding him that better porn sites exist every time it comes up.
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Meanwhile in Australia, they just passed a bill requiring social media to verify the age of their users to make sure they’re over 16
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I feel like reddit and YouTube are completely different leagues when it comes to porn… Porn is the only reason I haven’t deleted my last reddit account
meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 17 hours ago
Peak French stupidity, this isn’t about protecting kids - it’s about building surveillance infrastructure. Back in 2024, critics already called this the foundation for a “Great Firewall of France”. Once you have the legal framework to block websites and force ISPs to implement monitoring, mission creep is inevitable.
The technical approach is laughably naive. They’re essentially creating a centralized system that could easily become a database of citizen sexual preferences. Even with their “double anonymity,” you’re still creating digital fingerprints and metadata trails.
Most importantly, it won’t work. Kids will just use VPNs - the same way adults are already doing. You’re not protecting anyone; you’re just pushing everyone toward circumvention tools while normalizing government control over what adults can access online.
It’s perfectly French because it combines maximum bureaucratic complexity with zero practical benefit, all while creating new opportunities for state overreach. Classic.
xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 hours ago
i think it should be a little harder for a child to watch anal prolapse fisting porn than “click yes if you’re of legal age”….
but… not a good excuse for creating a citizen surveillance database.meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 10 hours ago
Fair point on the current system being theater, but here’s the thing - any centralized age verification system creates exactly the surveillance database you’re worried about.
The “harder than clicking yes” solutions all have the same fundamental flaw: they require collecting and storing sensitive data that becomes a honeypot for both state actors and bad actors. Upload your ID? Now there’s a database linking your identity to your viewing habits. Credit card verification? Same problem, plus you’re creating financial trails.
The technical reality is that determined kids will circumvent anything you put in place. We already saw this play out - VPN registrations exploded 1,000% in France within 30 minutes. You’re not actually protecting kids; you’re just normalizing data collection on adults while teaching every teenager in the country how to use Tor.
Better approach would be device-level parental controls that parents can configure without creating centralized databases. Let Apple, Google, Microsoft handle age verification through their existing account systems where the data stays local. That way you get actual protection without building the infrastructure for a surveillance state.
The French solution gives you the worst of both worlds - ineffective protection AND mass surveillance. Classic government efficiency.
Noodle07@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Amen
network_switch@lemmy.ml 4 hours ago
I’m pretty satisfied as a subscriber. Slowly using proton mail for more and more important accounts. Constant usage of the VPN. Trying to use the calendar more but still haven’t broken my Google Calendar habits. Proton Drive I use over google; I just need a Linux desktop application. Proton pass, still haven’t given that a go. Comfortable with KeepassXC and managing the backups myself. Proton Docs, it’s OK. Solid start. Hoping that notes partnership/acquisition eventually replaces Google Keep for me as a cloud notes application. I have pretty strong confidence now in the company regardless of the slow Linux developments
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 hour ago
Not sure where I got it form, but I have a Proton VPN client on Linux. It is pretty barebone, but it works.
Personally I just pay the 12,10$ for Bitwarden and use SimpleLogin aliasses together with that.
I just miss Microsoft Office on Linux, but that has nothing to do with Proton.
njordomir@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
I hate how VPN access is the scaffolding holding the building up making things look normal. You can visit all your normal web sites, you can bypass georestrictions, you can be a little less tracked than you might otherwise be. But what happens when they decide to do away with that scaffolding and we all find out they tore down the house behind it while we were enjoying “normalcy”. Too much of making the web functional depends on vpns and adblocking. We shouldn’t have to do this stuff and Chromes adblocking scandle should impact millions of users all around the world unilaterally removing adblocking from the web. I fear for the day we have a US only internet and a global internet, not just on paper, but in actual practice.
passepartout@feddit.org 1 day ago
I’m shocked that this many people feel the need to disobey a rule that is only there to help the children. Next step must be to ban VPNs altogether, and enforcing all Internet users to be identified with their real identity (/s obviously).
scott@lemmy.org 1 day ago
Jokes on them I just have an incredibly high volume of DNS traffic
masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
passepartout@feddit.org 1 day ago
Wait, this can’t just be another useless DNS blocking, or is it?
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
The VPNs will be harder to ban. Not just from a technical standpoint, but politically as well. Big businesses will be absolutely opposed to VPN bans.
passepartout@feddit.org 1 day ago
There will be a lot of businesses who feel the (justified) need to hide the entrypoint to their infrastructure behind a VPN.
ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I feel they could easily ban VPN companies (maybe?), which is what 99.9% of people that want to browse from a different location use.
This won’t affect companies at all as they would be using their own VPN.
Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Teacher, leave the kids alone!
unautrenom@jlai.lu 20 hours ago
Fun fact: they already tried. In the same law where they tried to ban E2EE a few months ago. It went about as well as you’d expect.
affiliate@lemmy.world 1 day ago
if the VPN ban doesn’t work then the only reasonable course of action would be to ban the internet entirely. it’s the only way the children can be truly safe.
FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 day ago
Don’t give them ideas. If they block no-log VPNs I’m going to become a real threat 👀
CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 1 day ago
Does the rule in question even apply to end users? All I had heard of it was that it put some kind of requirement on the website itself to identify people, which a person seeking out a noncompliant or foreign website presumably wouldn’t be the one violating?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
At first I suspected this was the French government demanding that 40% of the videos be made in europe using the French language.
Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 22 hours ago
Which is weird since I often don’t hear much spoken dialogue in most porn films other than fake moans and screams.
BetaBlake@lemmy.world 1 day ago
How about you just parent your children? But it’s not about the children, that’s just always the convenient excuse
Taleya@aussie.zone 1 day ago
I remember when the French used to respond to this shit with fire instead
FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 17 hours ago
Now we get tear gased and shot with rubber bullets until we become disabled
HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Reminds me of the running joke I had with a French bloke in a place were I worked in about how Jacquie-Et-Michelle (NSFW) was a part of French Culture which none of our other colleagues seem to - or at least admitted to - get.
webmuc@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com 20 hours ago
once again porn leads technology
Finch9678@europe.pub 1 day ago
Out of the loop here, why did Pornhub leave France?
Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
French conservatives passed a law requiring porn sites to verify age of all site visitors. Pornhub is blocking France instead of forcing its visitors to provide ID.
pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Age verification requirements.
oppy1984@lemm.ee 1 day ago
As one headline put it “PornHub pulls out of France”.
devolution@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why do the French even need Pornhub when their basic movies are very porn adjacent?
Krompus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
There are other, much better sites, lol.
sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why do people even go to pornhub… there are so many other options
kepix@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
this only means that americans dont know about proton vpn
superminerJG@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
France underestimated the power of horny
Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 day ago
pornhub is so sanitized now, im guessing its mostly because of the OF videos.
trk@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Or as they call it in France, Le Porn
rpl6475@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Dont stand between the French and porn apparently.
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
wtf, france?
commander@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
I guess this bodes well for Proton becoming increasingly a Google One products replacement with more users potentially paying
Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
hows proton?
sircac@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Intrigued by the quarter a day oscillation in that graph… 🤔
Spaniard@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
And now they want to keep doing the job of the parents and forbid “social network” to kids 15 and under.
WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
I mean for context with the TikTok comparison using a VPN didn’t get you around the TikTok ban unless you also made an entirely new account.
BilboBargains@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
You horny bastards
bruhduh@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
How about mullvad
skinnydugan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Dr. Cox was right: “I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called ‘Bring Back the Porn.'”
WhiteRice@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Tumblr the Depraved?
mienshao@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I hate how hard this made me laugh
CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I still miss og tumblr and my little porn account i had going there.
0x0@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Does oglaf count as porn?
Asking for a friend.
fargeol@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well, it’s blocked by my porn blocker, so I’d say yes
Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Scared to click, someone pls provide context
HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I had totally forgotten oglaf existed, thanks for the reminder!
Iceman@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Oh, they’re trying!
FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 day ago
Bro’s name is Dr. Cocks
tomenzgg@midwest.social 20 hours ago
You don’t like Cox?