At an all-hands meeting last week, Google executives responded to employee questions about declining morale even with financial performance improving.
A decline in morale after record profits? I think a pizza party is an order.
Google employees question execs over 'decline in morale' after blowout earnings
Submitted 6 months ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
lautan@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
I’ll take Hawaiian.
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I’ll take a deep pan bbq executive
Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 months ago
You will take 1/64th of a plain cheese and like it.
jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 6 months ago
Pinaple on pizza, for the love of god!
S_204@lemm.ee 6 months ago
My firm threw a staff BBQ at one of the satellite sites yesterday. My director was texting me about going…45 mins away…for a hot dog… standing in a field on a rainy day…
Sorry boss, deadlines to meet gotta prioritize my work here.
Yet, there’s managers who very likely pay attention to who shows up and who doesn’t and judge their work based on it.
yggstyle@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Do no evil.Beatings will continue until morale improves.
Sandbag@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Beatings will continue until the stock price improves.
cornshark@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The stock price has improved yet the beatings continue
slingstone@lemmy.world 6 months ago
yggstyle@lemmy.world 6 months ago
They sure as hell don’t 🤣
bitwaba@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Beatings will continue
until
NutWrench@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Company-wide email: “We’ve had our best year EVER and it’s all thanks to YOU!” Me: “Great. Can I have a raise?” Company: “Oh, we can’t afford THAT.”
frezik@midwest.social 6 months ago
“Due to current market conditions . . .” is the line my group has been given. There never seems to be market conditions where the workers get to win.
los_chill@programming.dev 6 months ago
Market conditions for me but not for thee…
cornshark@lemmy.world 6 months ago
“here’s a layoff”
prole@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Best we can do is a pizza party
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 6 months ago
We don’t even get those any more.
ICastFist@programming.dev 6 months ago
Google is using artificial intelligence to summarize employee comments and questions for the forum.
Well, isn’t that a good start?
Anyway, the TLDR “answer” from CFO Porat is “We were spending too much”, while Pichai’s answer is “We hired too much people”. Way to dodge the question, assholes.
Alphabet’s full-time headcount climbed to over 190,000 at the end of 2022, up almost 22% from a year earlier and 40% higher than at the close of 2020.
So they had around 135k employees in 2020. Why the fuck did you overhire, then? Just to lay off and show off to investors as someone who increased profits in the most asinine way?
Pichai then joked that leadership should hold a “Finance 101” Ted Talk for employees.
Yeah, nevermind me, Sundar Pichai, earning way more money year after year while you’re all begging for raises, it’s just finances, you guys!
ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 6 months ago
Yeah, the Finance 101 comment was a good indication he doesn’t take the concerns seriously, it’s such a flippant response.
I can’t imagine any there’s a morale problem.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 months ago
“There wouldn’t be a morale problem if our employees weren’t so stupid”
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Ah yes, employees are only mad because they don’t understand the finances. Like, no, we’re disgruntled by layoffs no matter what. Layoffs trade morale and productivity for cash
bitwaba@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Yeah. Let’s let him teach a Finance 101 class.
I’d be interested in the lessons a guy that approved a 40% headcount increase then did layoffs and said “I take full responsibility” can teach anyone.
How’s the saying go? Those that can, do. Those that can’t, teach.. Go on professor. Schools us. The Investors are listening.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
This is the same company that fired a bunch of people for opposing genocide, right? That didn’t help morale? \s \s \s
KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 6 months ago
The fittings will continue until moral improves
mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Shareholder value must be extracted from your happiness
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Huh who would have seen that coming out of prioritising income over employees (and users)
jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Exactly, the CEO uses the word “expense” to refer to employees at least 4 times according to my count.
“The problem is a couple of years ago — two years ago, to be precise — we actually got that upside down and expenses started growing faster than revenues,” said Porat
They even joke that they need to give a Finance 101 Ted Talk, as if that will help. From their perspective, employees are not people. They’re not even resources to be nurtured. They’re expenses. And the company has a duty to keep expenses low.
What a tone-deaf response.
paddirn@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I feel like I’ve been having whiplash at work every other month. One month we’ll get word of record profits or cheery news about how we’re beating performance targets or whatever, but then the next month we’ll hear about some new internal cost-cutting initiative that feels like we’re having to tighten our belts with a hint of desperation to it. I never actually know how we’re doing because it feels like I’m getting two conflicting impressions.
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 months ago
Profits are higher than ever, but line must go up so you’re all fired.
Flipper@feddit.de 6 months ago
This is the best year we’ve ever had, also there won’t be any bonuses anymore.
hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 6 months ago
Companies can seem very bipolar that way. Always yelling about how well they’re doing, while also cutting costs to maximize investor confidence.
Natanael@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
It’s all for the profit margin that quarter
henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 months ago
They’d sell your soul for a couple of bucks.
JPSound@lemmy.world 6 months ago
That’s precisely what they do. But not only their souls but the souls of the employees just trying to provide for their families and live a normal and fulfilled life.
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 6 months ago
After 20+ in software, my loyalty towards my current employer is as strong and unyielding as theirs is to me: Not at all.
hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 6 months ago
I wonder if the decline in morale correlates with the decline in morals.
nifty@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Knowledge workers need to get out of this ego-driven complex that they don’t need unions. You’re working class and chattle, believing anything else is delusional and pathetic.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 6 months ago
For real, we need unions. It’s a slow boil now, knowledge workers are the next factory workers.
Soon to be displaced as corporations gobble up another chunk of worker wealth.
teresa1890@kbin.melroy.org 6 months ago
Google employees have recently expressed concerns about a decline in morale, despite the company's strong financial performance. At a recent all-hands meeting, employees questioned executives about various issues, including compensation practices and the apparent disconnect between the company's profits and employee satisfaction. These concerns were heightened by the recent announcement of significant earnings as per 오픈 AI report which contrasted with internal frustrations among the staff
teresa1890@kbin.melroy.org 6 months ago
Google employees have recently expressed concerns about a decline in morale, despite the company's strong financial performance. At a recent all-hands meeting, employees questioned executives about various issues, including compensation practices and the apparent disconnect between the company's profits and employee satisfaction. These concerns were heightened by the recent announcement of significant earnings as per 오픈 AI report which contrasted with internal frustrations among the staff
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
With this leadership, when you unionize.
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
Still, asking the question in this clear way that almost evokes the answer by itself is important. It puts it into the heads of people watching. Could be a union instigator. 😅
Hypx@fedia.io 6 months ago
It's also why there's no way Google can sustain these numbers. They pay workers like a random startup, just without any possibility of striking it rich on stock options. They are likely to be hemorrhaging talent at all engineering positions.
Lath@kbin.earth 6 months ago
They don't care. They have monopoly over everything!
They have your phones private data, they have your search history, they have your automatically uploaded pictures to Google drive of your butthole!
They own you and you'll do as they like, whenever they like!
Now where's that guy who knows how to operate all that stuff? Wait, he was fired to lower costs?
Oh...
Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 6 months ago
For as long as Google is part of FAANG, they will have a nearly unlimited supply of fresh grads to burn through, and fresh grads still line up to work there to get that name on their CV.
jdeath@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Ads are built. what do they need engineers for?
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Yes, the suits have taken over and switched the money squeeze to max.
ours@lemmy.world 6 months ago
And they’ll argue “you don’t need [all the things that make this company great]”. And then we’ll wonder how a once leading company is dying on their now crappy products/services.
EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 months ago
You would be mortified at how many people in big tech, including those that have directly experienced injustice or unfair treatment at work, simply want no part of a tech union.
Frankly, some industries absolutely need it (e.g. games). If they’ll put up with what they put up with and still choose not to unionize I don’t really know how software engineers will…
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
Oh I’m aware, am part of the industry. I think the disparately higher compensation relative to the rest of the economy has given us a false idea we’re paid fairly for what we produce. Which I have definitely felt myself. In fact I’ve felt very strange of the disparities within the industry itself. However that’s completely the wrong way to look at it. There’s no magical upper number that our labor deserves. Everything is determined by what people pay and how much they buy. So if the revenues and profits are sky high, and we know labor makes most of it happen, then our labor is simply worth that much more. Given that someone will collect the difference, we may as well get a larger share of it. The sooner we recognize that, the sooner we’ll get even higher compensation which will be much more beneficial for people in the wider economy than a much smaller proportion of the exec class getting wealthier.
sum_yung_gai@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Am I dumb or does th article not mention the executive’s response to this question?
kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 6 months ago
If it’s like a lot of other tech companies, likely this was posted in a questions thread during a large meeting, and while everyone can see the questions being posed, Execs pick and choose which questions they’re interested in answering, ignoring the ones they don’t like. It’s a good way of determining employee morale while avoiding all accountability.
anlumo@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It’s not really a question anyways, just a statement rephrased to fit into the format.