possiblylinux127

Not web based but you could always use Samba

You absolutely shouldn’t be exposing service on your computer to the internet

Firewalls (not NAT) exist for a reason

It’ll be abandoned in 6 months

Why did you use Claude to write this comment

You really should disclose this as AI slop

You can use Tor snowflakes or bridges to bypass restrictions

Not being impacted by security issues like these for one

China uses deep packet inspection so that makes sense

I think the the great Firewall is less restrictive with QUIC traffic. It might be worth trying fragmented QUIC as from what I’ve read the GFW struggles to reconstruct the traffic

Changing the port doesn’t actually accomplish much

Best practice is to just harden SSH so that not traffic gets nowhere

Nebula might actually work as it doesn’t use Wireguard

Possibly Tor? It supports TCP traffic so SSH should work

Outside of that I would look into censorship resistant protocols and techniques. What country are you in?

Sometimes Linux handles faults better than Windows

Typically dmesg shows error when the hardware is acting up

It can be a pain to manage but it works well once it is setup

Just make sure it isn’t your only line of defense

It is also quite a bit dated

You just use a VPN

Yes but I personally wouldn’t run OpenWRT on x86. I would instead pickup a old gateway/firewall device that is supported by openwrt.

I would drop into the Docker VM and use scp to transfer all if your data

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/14kjvkg/community_consensus_on_rustdesk_with_all_the/

Bigbluebutton

I’d say avoid Rustdesk due to its shady Chinese origins

I like Molly a lot better personally

Signal or Molly are probably going to be your best bets

The limitation of smaller platforms like Pixelfed is that basically no one uses them. If you are using Instagram to keep track of people in your local community you are unlikely to find anything else.

That is for containers not VMs

I’m thinking about doing something like BGP+Wireguard

You are getting confused by NAT

In IPv6 there is no NAT. NAT makes things more complicated and adds overhead that isn’t needed. In the old (pre Nat) internet IPs worked like there were suppose to and each device had its own routable address. IPv6 fixes this by both using a massive address space and allowing hosts to get infinite IPs. You can assign a IP address to each service since there is so much space.

I would look into learning about the OSI model

For context, Caddy is a reverse proxy which is specific to the layer 7 protocol http. Layer 7 protocols are generally not compatible with one another since under the hood SSH, HTTP are all very different despite them all running on top of TCP.

Do you not have internet access?

I personallly would just use a DNS challenge to get certificates

You just need a reverse proxy