possiblylinux127

It is also quite a bit dated

You just use a VPN

Yes but I personally wouldn’t run OpenWRT on x86. I would instead pickup a old gateway/firewall device that is supported by openwrt.

I would drop into the Docker VM and use scp to transfer all if your data

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/14kjvkg/community_consensus_on_rustdesk_with_all_the/

Bigbluebutton

I’d say avoid Rustdesk due to its shady Chinese origins

I like Molly a lot better personally

Signal or Molly are probably going to be your best bets

The limitation of smaller platforms like Pixelfed is that basically no one uses them. If you are using Instagram to keep track of people in your local community you are unlikely to find anything else.

That is for containers not VMs

I’m thinking about doing something like BGP+Wireguard

You are getting confused by NAT

In IPv6 there is no NAT. NAT makes things more complicated and adds overhead that isn’t needed. In the old (pre Nat) internet IPs worked like there were suppose to and each device had its own routable address. IPv6 fixes this by both using a massive address space and allowing hosts to get infinite IPs. You can assign a IP address to each service since there is so much space.

I would look into learning about the OSI model

For context, Caddy is a reverse proxy which is specific to the layer 7 protocol http. Layer 7 protocols are generally not compatible with one another since under the hood SSH, HTTP are all very different despite them all running on top of TCP.

Do you not have internet access?

I personallly would just use a DNS challenge to get certificates

You just need a reverse proxy

I’m not a big Google fan but I will give credit where credit is due

They do put their money where their mouth is

They can use it bit it will take around 10 years or so

You can’t really install Linux

I would just get a old workstation

Wireguard doesn’t respond to port scans so it changes nothing

Putting it on a non standard port will change nothing

IP resolution requires ARP/NDP which are layer 2

To play devil’s advocate, technically don’t need a router for network. Your Proxmox hosts should be in the same layer 2 which means they can communicate regardless of the state of the default gateway.

OpenWRT has a zone based Firewall just like OPNsense does. Sure it isn’t as clean but I don’t really see a usecase for OPNsense that OpenWRT couldn’t fulfill

Do you need VXlan? Unless you are doing something really funky, regular vlans should work fine. All you need is a router somewhere on your network to terminate the connection. In a homelab this would typically be a firewall as well as most people don’t need more than one router.

I personally would not recommend this setup as any issue with your proxmox cluster will turn into a network issue.

Instead, I would purchase a cheapish router that can run OpenWRT. If you are dead set on OPNsense you can find x86 boards from various vendors or you can make a dedicated router out of a network card and a small form factor computer

That hasn’t been my experience

Most small form factor machines will idle in less than 10 watts