cross-posted from: hexbear.net/post/7613489
The REASON it’s illegal and dangerous to walk from these hotels is there’s a damn whole canal between here and the stadium and the bridge is a limited-access highway. maps.app.goo.gl/5nK4bkNg9fHkWunn7
There isn’t a pedestrian bridge over the canal, that’s why you gotta get a ride.
socphoenix@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To be fair, the road design is literal highways all the way around it making it impossible to safely walk. It’s terrible design and super hazardous to pedestrians but there is a safety reason behind the rule.
Nomad@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Its also Americans driving on those roads.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
They should have been required to build pedestrian bridges and paths. If we didn’t line in a shithole capitalist hellhole.
ikidd@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
I mean, there’s a bridge right there. Hang a pedestrian walkway underneath. Plenty of bridges like that where it’s been added after the fact.
But we know, it’ll see roughly 12 people a year actually use it because they’re Americans.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 day ago
OP got the picture from either hexbear or X…
It was obviously going to miss the point.
It’s not a law that you can’t walk from a hotel to a stadium, it’s a law that you can’t jaywalk…
www.legalfix.com/statutes/…/section-39-4-34
Likely across a highway/interstate that drink people keep thinking they can cross.
eatCasserole@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The decision to build a stadium that is completely inaccessible without a vehicle, even if you are staying at a hotel next door, is the point.
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
For at least a few decades, I’ve been hearing complaints about American city planning intentionally excluding people who choose to, or can do nothing but, walk. Making it mandatory to arrive via automobile, that’s what they’re complaining about.
The first I’d heard of this was a rich area in socal being completely inaccessible to the homeless because it was rimmed entirely by freeways. No way to leave or enter safely without a car and few groceries just outside. A local food desert. Or a food fort
With that said, half of MetLife’s exterior is walkable, according to some maps. A long walk around a freeway is part of it. I’m not a fan of an extra 10 minutes of walking with industrial scenery but it seems fine enough
mcv@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
If there’s a clear need to cross, they should provide a way to cross. That’s how you prevent people improvising their own way.
CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 1 day ago
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, it’s not a lie. You literally cannot walk from where this sign is posted to MetLife stadium while obeying New Jersey traffic laws. And I don’t mean some ad hoc one either; I mean e.g. ones about not playing Frogger across 10 lanes of highway traffic.
cattywampas@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s not necessarily a lie, it’s illegal to walk on highways almost everywhere.