Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

I dunno

⁨0⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone/posts/Ao/vN/AovNhRmmeHwHDFK.jpg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    the answer is [Answer]

    source
  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Careful, you’ll summon Smartman Apps (with emojis) to insist mathematics has exactly one perfect unambiguous syntax, where 2*(1+3) is somehow different from 2(1+3), and also reverse Polish notation does-too have parentheses.

    source
  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    5 isn’t a valid function name, is obviously the right answer.

    source
    • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Depends on the language.

      source
    • marcos@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’m pretty sure that’s a module operator…

      source
    • gnutrino@programming.dev ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It could be a Church Numeral in which case function application is the same as addition and the answer is actually 10…

      source
    • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?

      source
      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case…

        But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.

        source
  • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The education system did not fail me. I failed my education.

    source
  • MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    37

    source
    • Lemminary@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      67

      source
      • Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Hut hut!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    PEMDAS bitches.

    source
    • agedcorn@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally… bitches.

      source
      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Image

        source
    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s interesting that you can somewhat tell where you are from based on this, I learned it as BODMAS

      source
      • sbeak@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I learned BODMAS too! It seems BIDMAS is another one (British I think), PEMDAS is the weird American one, BEDMAS is a thing too. You’re able to vary the first letter (parenthesis or brackets), second letter (indices/exponent/“order” or “operation”), and the order of multiplication/division (MS or SM) and addition/SUBTRACTION (AD or DA)

        Very interesting indeed.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Endmaker@ani.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Where are pemdas and bodmas users from?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • radioactivefunguy@piefed.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        O - oxponent?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I never ran into PEMDAS while growing up, in Sweden I’ve always been taught of it as the following order of operations:

      1. P
      2. E & Roots
      3. M & D
      4. A & S
      source
      • stray@pawb.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        …wikimedia.org/…/1280px-Prioriteringsdjävulen.svg…

        source
      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        That’s PEMDAS…

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Technically roots are a form of exponent, just fractional (square root is power of 1/2, for instance). I can see how it could be easier to conceptualize when you break it down like that though. Neat to see the differences compared to the US breakdown :)

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Presuming PEMDAS is our order of operations and the 5 next to the parentheses indicates multiplication…

    2+5(8-5) -> 2+5(3) -> 2+15=17

    Other than adding a multiplication indicator next to parentheses for clarification (I believe it’s * for programming and text chat purposes, a miniature “x” or dot for pen and paper/traditional calculators), this seems fine, yeah.

    …I worry about how many people may not understand solving equations like these.

    source
    • Alaknar@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Multiplication sign is not required in situations like this. Same with unknowns - you don’t have to write 2*x, you just write 2x.

      source
    • ftbd@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s not even an equation, just basic algebra

      source
      • Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Technically not algebra, right? Algebra is where you move things around and solve for variables, and that kind of thing. This is just arithmetic.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Algebra has horrible syntax. Way too much implications.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Fair enough, I’ve heard “math problem” and “math equation” used interchangeably.

        Also you would be surprised how many people do not know basic algebra, at least in the US rofl

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I prefer BM-DAS, no one’s out here doing exponents, and no one calls brackets “parentheses”…

      source
      • Deebster@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I learnt it as BODMAS (brackets, orders, division and multiplication, addition and subtraction).

        source
      • cobysev@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        The way I was taught growing up, brackets are [these]. Parenthesis are (these).

        Yes, technically the latter are also brackets. But they can also be called parenthesis, whereas the former is exclusively a bracket. So we were taught to call them separate words to differentiate while doing equations.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      While I never failed a math class, I also never went last high school. When would your presumptions NOT be true?

      source
      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Some forms of programming syntax, although there are the fringe cases where an equation is represented by a symbol in conjunction with a parentheses input.

        For example:

        y(x) = 2x+3

        5+y(1) = 10, as 1 is substituted in for x in the prior equation.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I feel like I am getting trolled

    Isn’t 17 the actual right answer?

    source
    • marcos@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Some people insist there’s no “correct” order for the basic arithmetic operations. And worse, some people insist the correct order is parenthesis first, then left to right.

      Both of those sets of people are wrong.

      source
      • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Well, this is just a writing standard that is globally agreed on,

        The writing rules are defined by humans not by natural force
        (That one thing and another thing are two things, is a rule from nature, as comparison)

        source
      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I mean, arithmetic order is just convention, not a mathematical truth. But that convention works in the way we know, yes, because that’s what’s… well… convention

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • MotoAsh@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Hopefully you can see where their confusion might come from, though. PEMDAS is more P-E-MD-AS. If you have a bunch of unparenthesized addition and subtraction, left to right is correct. A lot of like, firstgrader math problems are just basic problems that are usually left to right (but should have some extras to highlight PEMDAS somewhere I’d hope).

        So they’re mostly telling you they only remember as much math as a small child that flunked.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
      [deleted]
      source
      • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Yeah I know that. But I was feeling confused as to why it was here. That’s why I was feeling trolled, because it made me doubt basic math for being posted in a memes community.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There is no answer. Because there is no question.

      source
      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        That is a problem, tho

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • NewDark@lemmings.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Exactly

      source
      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        So it’s just an unfunny meme?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • psx_crab@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Obviously the answer is 2+x(y)

    source
    • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      And even if you don’t simplify it to y the end result is the same
      2+x(y-z) = 2+xy-xz

      source
      • MrSmith@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I don’t know why, but this was intuitively my first approach. Eve though it’s much simpler than that.

        source