Arrests come as Trump lands in UK for second state visit
What even is the crime? Is projecting light onto a surface now considered vandalism?
Four arrested after photo of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein projected onto Windsor Castle
Submitted 5 weeks ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
Comments
Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 weeks ago
sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Hurting bourgeois feelings is a crime now I guess
Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 weeks ago
How is that even possible? How can you hurt something that doesn’t even exist?
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 weeks ago
hunting aristocrats, which are worst than the bourgeois.
kautau@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
What is the charge? Projecting an image? Projecting a succulent incriminating image?
tal@olio.cafe 5 weeks ago
I'm not sure if it's what was used here. A lot of areas have some kind of generic "nuisance" law, which basically serves as a general purpose "someone is doing something obnoxious that affects us and we want to provide law enforcement with a way to make them stop" tool.
kagis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuisance
Under the common law, persons in possession of real property (land owners, lease holders etc.) are entitled to the quiet enjoyment of their lands. However this doesn't include visitors or those who aren't considered to have an interest in the land. If a neighbour interferes with that quiet enjoyment, either by creating smells, sounds, pollution or any other hazard that extends past the boundaries of the property, the affected party may make a claim in nuisance.
Legally, the term nuisance is traditionally used in three ways:
- to describe an activity or condition that is harmful or annoying to others (e.g., indecent conduct, a rubbish heap or a smoking chimney)
- to describe the harm caused by the before-mentioned activity or condition (e.g., loud noises or objectionable odors)
- to describe a legal liability that arises from the combination of the two.[2] However, the "interference" was not the result of a neighbor stealing land or trespassing on the land. Instead, it arose from activities taking place on another person's land that affected the enjoyment of that land.[3]
The law of nuisance was created to stop such bothersome activities or conduct when they unreasonably interfered either with the rights of other private landowners (i.e., private nuisance) or with the rights of the general public (i.e., public nuisance)
HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Apparently Malicious communications.
So basically the officers knew full well they have 0 chance of a successful trial. As no way any court will consider the intent to cause distress.
But instead are openly acting to silence inconvenient speech.
Luckaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
It’s considered vandalism only when it’s not a projection of Gail Porter’s arse, apparently.
Aria@lemmygrad.ml 5 weeks ago
They did that without her consent!?
MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Apparently it wasn’t a static image it was a ten minute movie of images of Trump, Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Nonce Andrew and expose interviews.
Well done.
njm1314@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
The crime of making rich people uncomfortable. That’s literally it.
blackn1ght@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Arrested for displaying a picture onto a stone wall? Fuck off
lmdnw@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
If it’s illegal to peacefully protest, then it’s time for violence against the oppressors.
slickgoat@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Interested in knowing the charge?
"Criminal misuse of light ", perhaps?
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
Oi! You got a license for those photons?
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Well copper, have you got a loicense for that billy club!?
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Enjoying a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
I think it was something to do with electronic communications
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
Denjin@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
This government seems to see the “beneficial” trade deal with the US as one of the key successes of their tenure. If it breaks down, they’ve got exactly zero wins and only a series of disasters they’ve lurched between since taking office.
Ignoring the fact that the deal seems entirely one sided and allows US tech giants to snap up contracts across whole swathes of British institutions, despite not being able to find any reasons for things like LLMs in government departments, without any reciprocal benefits like lifting steel or car tariffs which are all still in place and were what starmer used as examples of how good the trade deal is.
Doing “deals” with trump is like grabbing a snake by the tail, sure you might look for a while like you have control but at any moment the snake can turn around and bite you. So now we’re stuck in a situation where we have to collectively suck trumps cock lest he decide to just say “50% tariffs for you bitches now”.
Hence the strong arm tactics by the home office to scare people into not doing things like showing foreign visitors our contempt for them, which has been a long standing tradition of the British people.
Photo55@mastodon.social 5 weeks ago
rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Awh yeah nice let’s just bend the knee even further shall we Starmer you pie-faced bellend
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
nice going. make peaceful protest illegal. surely this won’t have completely expected repercussions
Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Trump’s here for two days, I think. I imagine all four will be released without further charge on the third day.
Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Oi you got a loisence for that projector?
TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 5 weeks ago
Oh no. Did the light hurt the castle?
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Understandable, in true Britain first spirit they should’ve projected the royal nonce Andrew.
BilboBargains@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
This is what peak trolling looks like guise. It has all the elements for a perfect recipe. Bloated and petulant narcissist target, check. Corpulent and obsequious hosts, check. Incredibly damaging and embarrassing open secret that nobody wants to publicly discuss but everyone is dying to find out what’s in the dossier, chef’s kiss.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
I hope they don’t get convicted with anything and it was just a case to stop them.
Without looking, this looks like the work of Led By Donkeys
Aria@lemmygrad.ml 5 weeks ago
Okay so Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were arrested, that’s big news, guess they resurrected him. Who are the other two?
Lastangel@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
So peacefully projecting an unedited picture that doesn’t breach anyone’s privacy or spill any secrets, is ‘malicious communication’.
And telling thousands of rioters-in-waiting that they need to ‘kill or be killed’ isn’t.
snooggums@piefed.world 5 weeks ago
Oh look, the truth is malicious!
doctortofu@piefed.social 5 weeks ago
"Malicious communications"? A heinous crime indeed! So when is Trump getting arrested for it, together with most if not all politicians?
FerretyFever0@fedia.io 5 weeks ago
Yeah, that's the UK for ya. A ton of random bullshit laws lol
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Well Trump is American and they adhere to free speech to the point of insanity so nope there.
echodot@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
If that’s malicious communication then Tommy Robson probably is up for the death penalty. Except strangely not.
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
“malicious communications” reads like something straight out of Orwell
HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Translation 4 inconvenient people were silenced by officers. By forcibly removing them from the scene. Knowing full well the CPS will likely not press charges.
Hector@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Do not overeatimate the cps they are cynical cunts. Or the judges.
mannycalavera@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
It’s just performative. An exercise to waste time and make it look like the police and state are “doing something”. They probably take their cues from the Home Office.