I never paid much attention to his debates, but from what little snippets I’ve seen, along with the “Prove Me Wrong” schtick seems to indicate he already decided he was right and others were wrong.
There’s plenty of rhetoric and memes already, I’d like to avoid more rhetoric and memes, and I ask this question with genuine curiosity and earnest desire for learning and understanding.
Steve@communick.news 3 weeks ago
No. He operates as an Evangelical Apologist. He makes arguments that sound logical and convincing enough, as long as you don’t think about or look into them that much.
I think at Stamford recently his whole argument against gay marriage was completely torn down, and he finally just said, he simply didn’t like it. I’ll look for the video.
52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
He changed his mind to agree with Catholics about the Blessed Virgin Mary. That’s rare for an Evangelical.
mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 3 weeks ago
So he supported the false intercessor in Mary? That sounds like worshiping the Image of the Beast (the idols the Pope set up) if you ask me.
HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Thanks for answering the question properly.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 weeks ago
By “properly” you seem to mean “giving me the answer I wanted even if it’s wrong, without any evidence to support it”.
mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 3 weeks ago
Leviticus 18:26 is the argument used against homosexuality, for it says (using YLT) “And with a male thou dost not lie as one lieth with a woman; abomination it [is].”
Steve@communick.news 3 weeks ago
“My favorite book said so”, isn’t an argument. It’s a delusion.