Musk’s X blocks links to JD Vance dossier and suspends journalist who posted it
Submitted 1 month ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 1 month ago
cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Some ai tdlr The document appears to be a comprehensive research dossier on J.D. Vance, dated February 23, 2024, and labeled as “Privileged & Confidential.” It includes detailed background on Vance’s political career, financial records, personal history, and potential vulnerabilities. Below is a summary of key sections:
-
Executive Synopsis and Vulnerabilities:
- Anti-Trump Record and Establishment Ties: During the 2016 election, Vance was opposed to Donald Trump, referring to Trump as dangerous and criticizing his policies. He was described as a “never Trumper” and expressed doubts about Trump’s effectiveness.
- Questionable Conservatism: Vance’s political positions often cross party lines. He has praised certain Democratic policies, opposed some core Republican policies like the 2017 tax cuts, and supported higher taxes for businesses and individuals without children. His stance on labor unions and criticism of corporate interests also mark him as diverging from traditional Republican economic priorities.
-
Top Hits:
- Political and Voting History: Vance failed to vote in several elections between 2018 and 2020 and was not a registered Republican in Hamilton County until 2022.
- Lobbying Ties: While at Sidley Austin, Vance worked for clients such as Purdue Pharma and companies tied to the Chinese Communist Party.
- Liberal Tendencies: Vance has previously expressed admiration for Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Bernie Sanders.
-
Campaign Finance:
- 2022 Senate Campaign: Vance raised nearly $16 million, with contributions from Republican committees, corporations, and notable PACs. He also received donations from individuals with anti-Trump views.
- 2028 Re-election Campaign: Since 2023, Vance raised over $1.5 million, with funds coming from PACs and corporations like SpaceX, Honeywell, and Comcast.
-
Policy and Controversial Views:
- Vance has supported raising taxes, especially for those without children, and has advocated for stronger labor union reforms.
- He has been critical of both Republican efforts to repeal Obamacare and Trump’s domestic policies.
- On social issues, Vance opposes abortion, supports traditional family structures, and advocates for stricter immigration controls.
- He has also been critical of foreign interventions, particularly in Ukraine, and supports non-interventionism.
-
Personal Information:
- Vance is married to Usha Bala Vance and has three children. He has served as a U.S. Senator from Ohio since 2023. Prior to that, he worked in venture capital and at a law firm.
This summary highlights Vance’s evolving political positions, campaign finance details, and areas of potential vulnerability that could be used by opponents in future political contests.
RxBrad@infosec.pub 1 month ago
So, uh… Why does Elon even care about this?
Is this from that Iranian hack of the Trump organization or something?
-
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Nice.
What a strange read. I can’t believe they went with this weirdo.
rsuri@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is pretty much a summary of a lot of already public data. Could be valuable as an appendix of ways to attack Vance but otherwise not much new here.
My takeaway is the Trump campaign was too sycophantic to Trump to notice Vance’s actual problems. They have records of his weird views on domestic violence and other strange views but they’re buried in mountains of data about everything he’s said about Trump. And his obsession with childless women isn’t in the document anywhere as far as I can tell.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I didn’t even take that away from it because, like you said, it was all public information already. The second I heard they picked the guy who called Trump “America’s Hitler” was when I knew that they once again didn’t bother doing their due diligence.
Tyfud@lemmy.world 1 month ago
He has praised certain Democratic policies, opposed some core Republican policies like the 2017 tax cuts, and supported higher taxes for businesses and individuals without children.
Red_October@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“Free Speech Absolutist.”
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
So that’s what $45B worth of free speech looks like.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Don’t be ridiculous and mean.
It was $44 billion.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Whenever the right says “free speech”, they mean “speech controlled by us”.
TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 1 month ago
For anyone on this thread who doesn’t know who Ken Klip is, please check out his free Substack (and subscribe if you can). I wasn’t on Twitter very long (maybe 1.5 years before Elmong took over) but one of the people I value that I ran into on that platform is Ken Klippenstein and I’ve been following him since. He’s amazing at filing thousands of FOIA requests and doing the digging into them that no mainstream journalist does anymore. He also recently quit The Intercept because they were enshittifying far more than he was comfortable with, which for a writer is a huge thing to leave the umbrella of a company like that and a paycheck behind. Writers going out on their own in this climate is the only way we’ll stay even remotely unfucked in the post-information (or misinformation) age.
Klip fuckin rules. Please give him some due.
Species8472@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
To quote a commenter on Ars:
“Freedom of speech for me, not for thee”
That sums it up quite accuratly.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 month ago
44… plus Fallout cost
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I just can’t take all this free speech that’s happening right now
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Someone trying to invoke good old Barbara Streisand?
itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Matching suits and ties. How fucking weird.
thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The ties don’t exactly match. The orange one made sure his tie was the longest and stupidest looking.
Telorand@reddthat.com 1 month ago
I hope he eventually dyes his hair the same color, too.
Either one of them. It would be weird either way.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 month ago
It would make trump look a tiny bit more normal I think.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 month ago
What a twat.
zephorah@lemm.ee 1 month ago
FB is also threatening bans for posting any links to it.
4th_Times_A_Charm@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Anyone have a working link to it?
revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This link doesn’t work anymore, which is why I believe OP specified.
4th_Times_A_Charm@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Thank you.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Here’s a better link that actually works
kenklippenstein.com/…/read-the-jd-vance-dossier
No idea where the other person got their API link
sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Is JD Vance required to where the same outfit as Trump, except with a shorter, less girthy tie?
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 month ago
Out of the criticisms I have of Vance, I do have to say that he wears the Trump uniform better than Trump himself.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean that’s not hard to do, Vance is at least vaguely human shaped.
Phegan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Free speech absolutist
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They’re fucking, aren’t they?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Musk and Vance?
Nah, Vance needs more cushion for the pushin’.
pyre@lemmy.world 1 month ago
… the general population, yes.
kokesh@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Wait… That couch fucking muppet wears same tie?
rayyy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You mean this dossier?
Reality_Suit@lemmy.one 1 month ago
Musk is a fucking anti American liability. How the fuck does he have access to military contracts
SoupBrick@yiffit.net 1 month ago
Money
Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Money
merde@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
asks the same question ☞ theguardian.com/…/elon-musk-us-national-security
TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Money
Banichan@dormi.zone 1 month ago
No one’s assassinated him yet 🤷♂️