This thing is gonna flop hard.
Sony’s PlayStation Portal gives a confusing first impression
Submitted 1 year ago by sanqueue@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
donuts@kbin.social 1 year ago
Eggyhead@kbin.social 1 year ago
Portal’s not so bad if you’re happy with just your PlayStation library and simply want something for your bedside stand.
I currently use a retroid pocket 3+ for almost only that purpose, and let me tell you, an 8 inch, 1080p screen + a full dualsense in my hands at night for just $200 seems like a really nice upgrade even if it means leaving my emulators on a different device.
(Too bad for Sony I’ll personally be spending a lot more to have a Steam Deck OLED though) (teehee)
donuts@kbin.social 1 year ago
I have a Steam Deck and I don't even own a PS5, so I'm probably way outside of the market for the Portal...
But I'm really finding it hard imagine this device finding a broad audience, since even in a hypothetical best case we're talking about a subset of a subset of PS5 owners. From what I understand the new PSVR sold pretty badly despite being a pretty solid piece of VR hardware, this feels like a very niche and underwhelming piece of hardware and so I really can't imagine it performing any better.
Someone will buy a PS Portal, and hopefully they like it, but when the smoke clears I don't see it being a big hit.
The Steam Deck OLED on the other hand, I suspect will sell out fast. It seems like there is a pretty big chunk of people who were interested in the first gen Steam Deck but opted for the wait and see approach, and I can imagine a lot of those people jumping on the Steam Deck OLED now that they know the device has lasting power. Personally I probably can't justify the cost of upgrading from the LCD model right now, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to...
Zellith@kbin.social 1 year ago
I dont have a TV in my room, but couldn't I set up a system for the same price where I can play all my console or PC games in bed if I wanted to? For the same price that is?. It might be an interesting purchase if someone else wanted to be able to use the TV, but if I was buying one for me to play games on while in bed then my partner can gtfo lol.
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 1 year ago
I still just do not understand who this is for. It seems extremely niche. I can’t see this selling all that well.
Wogi@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hi. It’s me. I’m the one it’s for.
I have a den where my PlayStation is hooked up to the nice TV. I don’t necessarily always want to be down there to play games, for any number of reasons. Sometimes my wife wants to watch TV while I want to play a game, and this allows us to be in the same room and do that.
doricub@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m in the same boat with my PC. Bought a steam deck for the same reason.
lechatron@lemmy.today 1 year ago
Remote play runs on just about anything though, you could use a phone, chromecast, computer. I bought a $15 phone mount that hooks onto my PS5 controller and it’s essentially this device, but with the added benefit of using a device with more than one use.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
All the people giving this product shit are single.
ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I have an actual use case for this. It is kind of niche. I don’t personally have kids but I have friends over a lot to watch sports or BBQ or whatever. I have a PS5, a respectable desktop, and a Steam Deck. I prefer the portable option of the Steam Deck or, at worst, streaming to it. I don’t know why but that’s just what I enjoy.
As the kids have gotten older, they really want to play the PS5. But if the football game is on, they cannot have the TV. So, I was using Chiaki to let them stream from the PS5. So, all my PS5 game saves are basically fucked. The younger ones will use up any and all ammo or other in-game supplies and the older ones will make progress and I’ll just be lost next login. But the worst thing is when they exit Chiaki and play my PC version of a game. I specifically tell them not to do that but they aren’t my kids so I can’t backhand them.
So, now we have a solution. A thing like the Steam Deck that is limited to only fucking up PS5 game saves so if I really want to enjoy a game, I can get the Steam version. The kids can go hog wild on the PS5. They can get sticky shit on the PlayStation Portal — and they will if there is one ounce of sugar within 5 miles. My PC is in my office and my Steam Deck is going to be locked up. I’ll actually be able to enjoy a game again. And for only $200.
redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 year ago
Dude, the kids must’ve love you. You basically bought a PS5, a PS Portal and a bunch of PS5 games (which usually more expensive than their PC counterparts) and perhaps a PS plus subscription just for your friends’ kids.
Saxoboneless@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s for people that both own a PS5 and liked the Wii U.
chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nothing like basing your idea on Nintendo’s worst selling console for ultimate success.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
It’s not for the kid who has his ps5 in his room, or the single adult who has full access all the time to sit on his living room couch eating cheerios in his underwear. It’s also not for the single guy making his living by reviewing video game junk that comes out in hopes of being paid for what he writes.
It’s for families where mom or dad or sibling wants the TV for other things. So you can go back to the bedroom or den or garage or wherever else that isn’t blasting the 20th straight episode of my little pony and get some game time in.
It’s 200 bucks. Ok. I have a game laptop and a steam deck. I never use the laptop anymore. The steam deck is too quick and easy. Streaming to cell phones gets you a smaller screen, smaller battery, and need to spend $100 on a gaming controller anyhow. You also can’t start up the ps5 and move things along so quickly. Also with phones streaming like this, the gyro isn’t as precise/great to use compared to a ps5 controller. I assume this screen/controller Playstation device works as well as their ps5 controller does.
So yeah. It’s $200 for something that you may be able to do almost as well for free…but it’s not free. It’s based on if you already own hundreds of dollars worth of other things, m9st of which wouldn’t work quite as well.
ieightpi@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sony is just so bad at this whole portable gaming thing, aren’t they?
jay9@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Classic case of design by committee.
WoodlandAlliance@lemm.ee 1 year ago
[deleted]Revanee@lemmy.one 1 year ago
Best handheld of all time IMHO
BertramDitore@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not only does the functionality seem almost completely unnecessary except for a limited use case here and there, but this thing is truly ugly. Who designed this travesty? How would you even store this bumpy hunk of plastic?
Sony used to have some of the most elegant and clean hardware aesthetics. Their designs were genuinely beautiful, simple, and practical. They used to ooze premium luxury. Now we get a screen with a sawed off controller stuck to the sides? Disappointing.
You know what? I take it back. The PS5 is shaped like a modem from 1999, it deserves this ugly step-cousin.
redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 year ago
But it does look like more comfortable to hold than psvita. My hands hurt if I play my vita without a grip, which essentially turns the vita into a boomerang.
Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I refused to buy a PS5 because of how ugly it is. My friends got one, but I chose an XB1X because of how much better it goes with my house.
crawancon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
you chose a gaming platform because of how it looks?
we are not the same
dditty@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I have a PS5 and I just do remote play to my Android tablet with the ps controller connected via Bluetooth and for most games it’s acceptable; there is a little latency so it wouldn’t be good enough for fps games however. I wouldn’t buy this product but if the latency is improved I could see several of my friends getting one of these.
sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 1 year ago
As an owner of 2 Vita’s that didn’t use this feature on PS3, PS4, zero chance I’d buy this to do it on PS5.
SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Is this a batarang?
Defaced@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This thing is terrible, who the fuck is buying shit like this? What a waste of electronic materials. They could’ve made a true handheld with the power of the steam deck that could run PS5 games at lower resolutions, but fuck no! Let’s make some bullshit abomination of a Vita successor and give anyone who loves portable gaming the middle finger, especially since you can’t use Bluetooth headphones. Fuck you Sony.
nix@merv.news 1 year ago
Seems like it should’ve just been a thing you can connect your phone in the middle and it gives you the controls and a battery to remote play
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 year ago
Isn’t that what PS Remote Play is for?
DarkThoughts@kbin.social 1 year ago
Or tablets. I think there are gamepads and gamepad attachments like that, but probably trash tier quality in comparison. I agree though. They could've combined that with an app based streaming service, but also allow to use it for whatever else you might play on it. Would've actually been much more interesting of a product.
Davel23@kbin.social 1 year ago
I still say it should have been called the "PSPiiU".
bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
PiiU is exactly what I said when I saw this stank ass thing 🤢
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 1 year ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
It doesn’t do any kind of cloud streaming like Nvidia’s Geforce Now or Sony’s own PlayStation Plus Premium subscription, and it can’t run anything locally (not even YouTube or Netflix).
The Portal is purpose-built to use a singular feature Sony first debuted with the PS3 and PSP back in 2006 that’s also widely available on other devices you may already own, making me wonder: why does this exist?
Compared to a Switch with standard Joy-Con controllers, the tradeoff in weight is made up for by its large grips that are comfier to use for extended play sessions.
I’ve initially played a handful of hours with various PS5 games (Resident Evil 4, Armored Core VI Fires of Rubicon, and Astro’s Playroom, to name a few) in my limited time with the PlayStation Portal so far.
At various points in the last two years, I’ve tinkered with using Remote Play to stream games from my PlayStation 5 to my PS4, my PC, various Android devices, an iPhone, an iPad Pro, and even a Steam Deck using open-source software Chiaki.
My first impression is that this device is primarily for PlayStation diehards who want a simple, dedicated tool for streaming games around their homes.
The original article contains 714 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
o0joshua0o@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’d like to get one of these to take on trips. It’s a shame it can’t be used on the plane, but it would still be nice in the hotel room.
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 1 year ago
You’d have to take your PS5 with you to use it on trips, so what would be the point? You’d still have to hook up your PS5 and have that running to use it.
CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This isn’t true. You can remote play from an outside network that is different from the one your PS5 is connected to provided that your PS5 is in rest mode and your connection at both ends is sufficient.
o0joshua0o@lemmy.world 1 year ago
False.
Halafax@kbin.social 1 year ago
I suspect I'm pretty much the only market for this thing. I can play while in bed, which is where most of switch gaming currently happens. The price is probably reasonable for what it cost them, but they need to explain why anyone besides me would want one.
Bayz0r@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ok, I’ll bite. What exactly makes you the only person in the world who can play a handheld in bed?
Mango@lemmy.world 1 year ago
How my console boys feelin? Where your games at?
DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 1 year ago
What’s the point in this thing if it’s not an actual handheld console? What does it do that a playstation controller + smartphone/tablet can’t do?
paultimate14@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Way better control experience, almost 2x the screen space, separate battery, and like a 5th the cost of a flagship smartphone.
Not for everyone, but still neat. This product makes me wonder if theh have other things in the works. I wouldn’t be surprised if there is something 3 years from now that releases where we say “this is like if the Portal was good”.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Not drain my cell battery or get interrupted from a call or text, have a much bigger screen than a phone, save you from trying to balance a tablet around on a bed or chair or recliner…
DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Those are incredibly small problems that are easily solved without having to spend $200
rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah I didn’t understand why I’d do this instead of just using my PC with a controller. Wifi streaming sucks, I’m not paying $200 for it
Halafax@kbin.social 1 year ago
Can I plug the new vr into it so I can get rid of the gosh-darn wire?
Halafax@kbin.social 1 year ago
Can I plug the new vr into it so I can get rid of the gosh-darn wire?
nicetriangle@kbin.social 1 year ago
Doubt it. The bandwidth needed for VR is pretty high and when people do wireless PCVR setups, the rule of thumb is setting up a nearby fast WiFi 5 router just for the VR connection.
thorbot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
$200 to play a console game on a different screen only within the same network is insane. You could spend $100 more and get a full blown handheld console. This is fucking stupid, Sony.
LongRedCoat@kbin.social 1 year ago
Yeah, it's the price that bothers me the most about this. For the same amount, you can get a whole Switch Lite.
And I'm still salty about how they treated the Vita. This is what we get as the first handheld successor to the Vita? And the Vita didn't cost much more.
thorbot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah Sony is smoking some good shit these days thinking people will buy this
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Switch lite is a much smaller screen and also 720 instead of 1080p. So yes, you could spend the same to get a switch lite, but if you don’t plan on buying Nintendo games, why on earth would you? The controller is nowhere near comparable to a ps5 controller and all other aspects of gaming around the house would also be worse.
Buying a PS5 controller is like $80, so at this point you’d be spending another $120 for the nice screen and big battery.
ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
You could likely get it to work outside of your network using a VPN, maybe.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
What are you buying for $300? Steam deck is about as cheap as you can get and that’s for $360. It’s also heavier, smaller screen, has a lower quality screen, and will run out of battery quicker.
So if you don’t do pc gaming, why on earth would you want to spend closer to double the price?
You know why you think it’s a stupid product? You either live alone or you still live with mom and dad and have a ps5 in your bedroom. This product isn’t for you, and you’re an idiot for thinking if it’s not something little ol you would want, than no one else must have a use for it, either.
lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This feels like a too much emotion for the subject matter.
thorbot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Critical fail. A switch is $300 and can be played on the couch. Also nice projection about living with mom and dad, it cracks me up when people accuse strangers on the internet of things. Proud homeowner of 6 years here, dipshit
KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 year ago
Oh I don’t know maybe you want to actually game portable and not just enjoy fake portability?