‘Kids Online Safety Act’ will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.::undefined
“The bill – endorsed by president Joe Biden…”
Why in the world would Biden support this Heritage foundation garbage?
Submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world [bot] to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/09/04/kids-online-safety-act-target-trans-lgbtq-content/
‘Kids Online Safety Act’ will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.::undefined
“The bill – endorsed by president Joe Biden…”
Why in the world would Biden support this Heritage foundation garbage?
‘Kids Online Safety Act’ will deliberately target trans content, senator admits
He’s a granddad. We shouldn’t have granddads who can’t work a remote be president. I assume he can’t work a remote.
Are you starting to see the cracks in the foundation? Are you starting to see how the game is played?
This is actually a fantastic example of typical politics, but not in the way you’re imagining. It’s a classic poison pill. Write a bill with something good (protecting children’s privacy online, which I think we’d all agree is good) and then put something unpalatable into it (transphobia and homophobia).
Someone votes for it, “Why do you hate LGBT people?” Someone votes against it, “Why don’t you want children to have stronger privacy laws on the Internet?”
It’s exhausting and a lose-lose. That said, I prefer if they don’t vote for it and take heat for “being anti privacy”. You don’t negotiate with people’s rights.
The only cracks here is that the senate are all a bunch of olds who don’t understand the internet.
Actually no, and furthermore I reject your ‘both sides’ rhetoric wholesale.
$$$$$$$$$$
Because he is an old senile man
He’s desperate to look bipartisan
Then again, Pinknews isn’t exactly a impartial source itself either, is it?
Biden has hurt blacks more than any larper nazi today.
“Trans porn must be curropting children because it’s all I watch now and my mind is way stronger than a child’s.” -Marsha Blackburn
…and my mind is stronger than a child’s…
It’s not though. It really, really isn’t.
I mean, at this stage you can tell that by the name.
These deplorables love children so much that they don’t even bat an eye at using child sexual abuse as a political tool while simultaneously turning a blind eye to 300,000 children raped by clergy.
Or children starving because they have to pay for shitty food at school, or children starving and having a bad life because their parents can’t afford to pay for more even if they already work, or children at orphanages…
Yeah, much like with forbidding abortion (but then never caring whether the no longer-aborted child will have a proper home to live), children are just a political tool.
It should be the parents’ job to regulate what kind of content their children consume on the internet, not the government’s.
Parents aren’t generally capable of that, I’ve learned.
This isn’t about protecting kids it’s about banning LGBT persons from the internet.
Not a surprise. That is the intention.
Yep exactly as we all knew.
She wants to confine children like I was to the years of confusion and alienation I had to go through. That’s cruel. I should not have had to feel so alone and nobody else should either.
It is more than just cruel. It is abusive and genocidal. LGBT youth will die because of this law and the countless others being passed in certain states.
Oh absolutely and they’ll likely try to punish those who try to save them
We should protect the children, lets start with the Catholic Church.
and the child mutilating church
How about we go after the real threat, churches.
Send your message to Congress. Here is a simple way to do so. resist.bot/petitions/PCCXRJ
Why is it always the Save The Children Act and not the Erradicate Trans People Act?
Kind of like Citizens United, has a better ring than “Politician pay offs”.
We need to harm the children to help the children don’t you understand?!!?!?!
Yeah the 1st amendment has gone out the window here. (on the other hand, why are they pushing the lgtbtq movement on kids. Kids aren’t smart at all and won’t understand the deeper meaning…)
This woman is the literal devil…
which is good. kids should not get influenced or make any decision at such age.
If you grew up without anything influencing you, you’re either an inanimate object or a cat
Good luck not being influenced by your surroundings
Ooooo totally because I (straight) was totally influenced by my gay uncle and other gay stuff I’ve seen online 🙄
While we’re at it we should get rid of cartoons because kids shouldn’t see stuff like someone slowly falling with an umbrella and trying it in real life since they’re influenced.
Just because someone is exposed to something at a young age doesn’t mean they’ll end up making decisions.
I hardly find the link with trans… same with the argument to “then ban straight content too”. Gay guy doesn’t pretend to be an anime girl .
trans is about mental disorder, dissociation between mind, body and frustration.
I’ve always thought that about religious youth programs. How is that not indoctrination of the youth?
I agree.
So all straight and cis content should be banned too, right, or is it only “degenerate” (to use the word the nazis used) content that should be influencing them?
If it were possible to “make” people gay, or trans, or whatever, then it would be possible to make gay or trans people straight or cis.
And if it were possible, given the huge pressure to do so from all angles, someone would have found a way to do it by now.
Kids are not going to be “made” LGBT by seeing something on the Internet. And if you talk to, for example, trans people older than the Internet, most will tell you about signs they had they were trans long before they had anything that could possibly introduce them to the subject.
The only thing this bill will do will cut people off of all ages from sources of support.
Yall said the same thing about some of us being gay. Turns out when used all of the same talking points back then, we were still gay. I was influenced to not be gay, because gay people are disgusting pedophiles who worship Satan, and I ended up gay despite not being a pedophile or worshiping Satan.
First of all, kids will question their gender and sexuality whether you like it or not - internet or no internet. Secondly, the Internet is a safe haven for lgbtq+ kids and taking away those supportive communities is going to be nothing but harmful. What evidence do you have that exposure to lgbtq+ communities “corrupts” children? I’m guessing none because it just doesn’t. Be better.
So true bestie
This is great news. Hopefully this makes headlines everywhere and this abomination of an Act can be thrown out.
Its not a bug, its a feature.
This is a classic GOP move. Name a bill something like “Free Americans for Internet Freedom Act” that prevents net neutrality and idiots love the name and support it. Name a bill something like “Kids Online Safety Act” as a way to censor and control information, and idiots love the name and support it
Good
Listen to the facist sing
“Take hope here
War is elsewhere
You were chosen
This is Gods land
Soon we’ll be free
Of blot and mixture
Seeds planted by our Forefathers hand”
A mass of promises
Begin to rupture
Like the pockets Of the new world kings
Like swollen stomachs In Appalachia
Like the priest that fucked you as he whispered holy things
A mass of tears have transform the stones now
Sharpened on suffering
And woven into the slings
Hope lies in the rubble of this rich fortress
Taking today what tomorrow never brings
Typical American to recite whatever this poem is to a non-American. Am i supposed to know or care what it means?
Please explain?
oui oui d’accord
good.
Do you carry all that hate around with you all the time, or are you just making today a special day?
Your opinion is valid, king
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Of course it will. Then once they have all the trans people rounded up they’ll target the gays, then the blacks, the mexicans, and so on and so forth until everyone’s in camps that isn’t white.
Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
You’re not safe even if you’re white. If nothing else they’ll target people who like the color blue just to keep some “enemy” in their sights.
OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Fascism requires an “other” to function. Once one “other” is a destroyed there will always be another one to take it’s place.
EzekielJK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Working backwards, we could reasonably expect Italian, Irish, and Polish people. Discrimination really isn’t about the color of your skin if history is anything to go off of.
PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well SCOTUS went ahead and let them have their anti-abortion laws, what else are they going to get their people distracted by? It was always going to be a never ending harassment of “others” leading to the spiral down into hell, SCOTUS just broke the seal for them to do it legally.
weew@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
they’ll never target the stupid, those are the people who will support them no matter what. They’re already trying to demonize intelligence and education.
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
True. The dumbification of America has been going on for years.
VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It’s not about colour anymore, it’s the return of classism.