Original article: nvidia.com/…/dlss5-breakthrough-in-visual-fidelit…
Fixed it.
Submitted 1 month ago by pewpew@feddit.it to [deleted]
https://feddit.it/pictrs/image/ad017607-ee75-4055-a831-280378b23f56.png
Comments
NONE_dc@lemmy.world 1 month ago
krisevol@lemmus.org 1 month ago
No way. Nvidia is currently the only gpu that do utilize 1440p 500hz oled monitors. Dlss4. 5 is a have charger for high refresh gaming.
daannii@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Guess they didn’t realize games have an art style.
Tampering with that by making all games look the same is destructive to the graphic art style.
Booo It’s bad Boooooo
Epp@lemmus.org 1 month ago
It’s like putting ketchup on a hamburger! If the chef wanted you to have ketchup, he would have put it on their himself. You’re spitting in his face by making changes to accommodate your personal preferences. One size fits all!
daannii@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I think it’s a bit different.
It’s more like changing a human made painting with AI to make the person look like modern IG “models”.
I think it’s fine to add condiments to food. That’s not really the same as painting over real human art , with AI slop.
MBech@feddit.dk 1 month ago
That’s like saying “you shouldn’t mod games, 'cause that’s not what the dev intended”. Idgaf what the dev/chef intended, if I like mods in my burger, I’m gonna season it to my liking.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It reminds me more of that old meme of “if Mona Lisa was painted today”.
KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 month ago
For realistic maybe but every style would need its own models and parameters to work well, seems like one thing more that will only fit for one flagship game and then realistically not used ever again
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As an embedded systems engineer, I find VLSI shaders to be a fantastic technology.
Simultaneously, AI code overall is absolute fucking trash.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I hate how bad NVIDIA has to be in general, because DLSS is legitimately amazing technology. Even the frame gen in DLSS 4 that was pretty rough at first is shockingly good in Borderlands 4 for example. Too bad they’re the reason no one can buy RAM
mr_eckneim@feddit.org 1 month ago
Looks like they trained their stuff on instagram posts tbh
daggermoon@piefed.world 1 month ago
It looks like dog shit lmao
papalonian@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Eh, the examples shown imo were 50/50 improvements vs downgrades. First few were good, couple looked really bad, then a few good ones again. I suppose it’s subjective. As long as it’s just an option that can be turned off I don’t think it’s that bad.
Sl00k@programming.dev 1 month ago
I personally think these looked really good IDK why it’s getting so much hate other than “ai bad” complaints
dellhiver@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Was watching the Digital Foundry review of this tech. They seemed impressed, the people in the comments were scathing
Everyday I think things can’t get worse. That maybe this will be the breaking point. But no.
The main Resident Evil example is just awful. It’s like an Instagram filter.
It’s worse than that guy who has been going around photoshopping “Ugly” female game characters to make them look hotter.
I hate this reality.
mycodesucks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Don’t forget that when Sony went back and did the HD remaster, they actually remodeled her that way.
All of the worst people are winning.
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Jesus Christ
defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip 1 month ago
Well at least the photoshopping is done by a human.
hedge_lord@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It is too… clean? The lighting is too “perfect”. Each object is an idea rather than an image to be interpreted. It conforms to what instagram considers to be realistic.
This is a mirror of human delusion averaged and contorted to gaze into itself, and as such I abhor it.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
This video has a neat fhowcase of what’s going on here. So-called “AI” adds detail where there should be none, which makes the faces look like worn-out, but polished leather.
YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
The examples they’ve shown are so static, I really want to see how the ‘invented details’ warp or phase in and out on fast motion scenes.
purrtastic@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
Digital Foundry are gushing over how amazing this is. digitalfoundry.net/…/nvidias-new-dlss-5-brings-ph…
pewpew@feddit.it 1 month ago
Yeah sure it looks more “real” but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.
I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
How is the removal of shadows considered to be better lighting in any way?
StellarSt0rm@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah i was thinking that, using the comparison tool i was able to see it better and it completely ruined the atmosphere in the first image. The image without DLSS5 looks darker and personally i think it looks better like that, DLSS5 then just completely removes that darkness and makes it look awful.
idealotus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ehhhh. I saw the text (“The Real Deal” poster on the window in one comparison). There’s still some artifacting, which to me is a deal breaker, especially if I have to DLSS everything instead of selected items.
But I’m also not a game developer, so I don’t know if the modeling differences are worth the tradeoff for something that most people won’t see in motion.
merdaverse@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Now with its own dedicated hardware: the SPU (Slop Processing Unit)
pewpew@feddit.it 1 month ago
Apparently you need a second RTX 5090 dedicated just to slopification duty
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
And I am fascinated by the number of people who, after all those years, still have no idea how DLSS and neural networks work.
gegil@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
I knew that nvidia will at some point make graphics fully ai generated, skipping the rendering.
pewpew@feddit.it 1 month ago
This is not the case… yet.
Some companies already tried this multiple times in the last two years, the future of gaming is looking bright
altphoto@lemmy.today 1 month ago
chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Also, twenty feathers and twenty pounds of bricks both weigh twenty pounds.
Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
I would try to interpolate your probably real question here, too. And I’m no AI. Unless I missed your point
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 month ago
No thx. I’m not too big on the last few generations of gaming anyway but if they’re really going to push their slop like this I’m out fully.
krisevol@lemmus.org 1 month ago
I actually love DLSS 4.5. no other method or gpu can do 1440p 500fps to run my oled monitor, but DLSS4. 5 can and it runs and plays amazing. I won’t go back to 144hz just to play native if i have a choice to do 500fps dlss.
Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I want to see what this wold look like applied to a character editor but then I never want to see it again.
BiomedOtaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Where can I post this ? Seriously I would love nvidia to see this.
vinyl@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
In that comparison pic, the lighting is so off, like with the ai version instantly theres a couple different light sources that illuminate the characters face
Epp@lemmus.org 1 month ago
You’re so clever. This post is a much bigger accomplishment than adding optional features to hardware. Bravo! Encore!
Do GMOs next. Point out that cultivating traits in bio organics is simply “slop food.” That’ll make them think twice!
faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Image