Fuck these pieces of shit dude. Fucking stop with the children talk. It’s all lies.
Pornography depicting sexual relationships between step-relatives set to be banned
Submitted 13 hours ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/pornography-sexual-relationships-step-relatives-5HjdTkd_2/
Comments
lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 9 hours ago
stop with the protecting children talk. It’s all lies.
Well in this case what’s the ulterior motive?
I do think children would be more protected if they could find a way to just ban porn from being viewed made or sold here, but the age-verification seems like enough in that regard (and the former idea is overreach, so ‘boo’, but would also help adults with porn problems).
Chakravanti@monero.town 9 hours ago
Burning books. Duh. Seriously. How are you so dense? It’s Farenheight 451 NOW.
ChexMax@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Idk what the ulterior motive is, but if your goal is to protect children this is like the third or fourth least damaging porn of all. Like ban all other fetishes first
Denjin@feddit.uk 13 hours ago
Step-prime minister, what are you doing?
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 10 hours ago
I presume they’re going to do this again and again knocking off a new category each time, and if so, I’d rather they spare us the slow march by just banning it all at once.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 hours ago
Yes the boiling frog approach. Now basically going to do it one at a time so they don’t get too much pushback.
espentan@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Next up is sexual relations with neighbours, then friends and finally sexual relations altogether.
Thank a god we have people looking out for us! /s
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
The only porn that will be allowed is between heterosexual married couples. And no peeking under the covers you perv! And don’t forget the weekly renewal off your porn license!
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 hours ago
Won’t someone rid us of those pesky lemon-stealing whores?
MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 11 hours ago
What are you doing, step-neighbor?
HowAbt2day@futurology.today 8 hours ago
I was thinking the same thing. It’ll be back to neighbors and brother’s best friend.
We’ve got Therians and MOGgers to replace the steps.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 hours ago
Which is more believable anyway, so I’m not really sure why it changed.
6stringringer@lemmy.zip 6 hours ago
I don’t know how my sister is going to get fee pizza from now on. Damnit.
Xenny@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
It turns out this isn’t a censorship ban or anything of the sort. The UK prime ministers are just tired of the unoriginality.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Oi! You got a license for that step-sibling?
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
It’s in there somewhere, I was looking for it. Might need to check the other side.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Isn’t that all porn? 🤣
hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 hours ago
what happens if two bro’s swap semen and then their parents get married and they are step bro’s but they stop the fucking, is that ok?
and who will be watching all this porn to check?
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 13 hours ago
I’ve never understood why this theme became so popular in porn. But also, it’s porn. If you’re watching it for the plot, you should probably be watching something else.
But obviously, this is more about banning something than actually an issue with the porn. Oiling up that slippery slope.
thatsnomayo@lemmy.ml 2 hours ago
I cannot answer this without sounding completely insane, even after the Epstein files people still won’t believe me
Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
I think a lot of it is because it makes writing really easy. You don’t need to come up with a reason for these two people to be near each other in an intimate setting, which they can easily turn into something more sexual. Not many people are watching for the plot, so they just need a bare bones contrivance for it taking place.
MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
You never quit beating your meat mid-fap because the plot was just so captivating?
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 hours ago
There was one that really stuck with me. This poor homeowner needed a plumber but she had no cash. It was a harrowing story of love and loss, and the climax was stunning.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
Hey, that lamp is really nice…where can I buy it?
Master@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
I think because in order to product the kink you need to set a ground base for story. A lot of people just want some sort of story instead of just straight into it.
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 9 hours ago
I think incest / 'stepcest' stuff is largely popular because:
- it can sprout innumerous plotlines, whereas most visual porn lacks story - the “domestic” nature of it means they don’t have to shell out for multiple sets or fancy sets. - The idea of other people breaking laws and putting themselves in danger seems to add to the dopamine hit of porn. Which is mabe why some people consume violent stuff.
In my op it’s popular with viewers largely because it is favoured by the studios.
I have to say though, from back in my porn watching days, i couldn’t stand the weird production quality in all the step-incest stuff. And the compulsion to pair up performers who have a big age gap, or to make performers look like teenagers, is disturbing. I doubt these things have changed.
It’s funny to imagine that the government might have a porn-Tsar who is just banning all the stuff they personally consider shite. Should have been me.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 8 hours ago
Porn-Tsar is my new favorite word.
KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 8 hours ago
Families have inherent relationships built that can be nodded at without much conversation being necessary. Basically porn with plot without requiring as much plot.
Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com 7 hours ago
There is a specific group that is in control of most of the porn websites. Lets just say they are super into it.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
because actual parental incest would fire up America’s family values.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 hours ago
Don’t look too closely at family trees in the Bible Belt.