Fuck these pieces of shit dude. Fucking stop with the children talk. It’s all lies.
Pornography depicting sexual relationships between step-relatives set to be banned
Submitted 3 weeks ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/pornography-sexual-relationships-step-relatives-5HjdTkd_2/
Comments
lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
stop with the protecting children talk. It’s all lies.
Well in this case what’s the ulterior motive?
I do think children would be more protected if they could find a way to just ban porn from being viewed made or sold here, but the age-verification seems like enough in that regard (and the former idea is overreach, so ‘boo’, but would also help adults with porn problems).
Chakravanti@monero.town 2 weeks ago
Burning books. Duh. Seriously. How are you so dense? It’s Farenheight 451 NOW.
ChexMax@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Idk what the ulterior motive is, but if your goal is to protect children this is like the third or fourth least damaging porn of all. Like ban all other fetishes first
toebert@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
There is no way the kids who grew up with technology in their lives from the start won’t find ways to work around it, especially when pitted against the people coming up with these legislations who struggle to understand the basics of technology.
Even if kids were to be completely banned from the internet and it somehow magically was enforceable, they’d just end up buying physical porn.
If they actually wanted improvement, they’d fund support for parents and the educational system so kids grow up in environments that teach them good values and feel safe in. But instead, we get this meaningless duct tape that’ll still probably cost a fortune for us, and will be unenforceable for anything but the biggest porn providers/distributors.
espentan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Next up is sexual relations with neighbours, then friends and finally sexual relations altogether.
Thank a god we have people looking out for us! /s
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The only porn that will be allowed is between heterosexual married couples. And no peeking under the covers you perv! And don’t forget the weekly renewal off your porn license!
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Won’t someone rid us of those pesky lemon-stealing whores?
Denjin@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Step-prime minister, what are you doing?
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
I presume they’re going to do this again and again knocking off a new category each time, and if so, I’d rather they spare us the slow march by just banning it all at once.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Yes the boiling frog approach. Now basically going to do it one at a time so they don’t get too much pushback.
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Governments can usually get away with whatever they wabt and the british government is the best example of this. I’d literally write a letter in and tell them they can get away with banning it all in one go if i thought they’d follow through on it.
But maybe there’s another reason they do it in little chunks; one distraction headline becomes about 14 distracrion headlines, so lavour gov is safe to have 14 seperste scandals over the course of the next year or so
FishFace@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Given that everyone’s watching porn either on small sites flying under the UK radar or through a VPN/Tor now, what will this achieve exactly?
yakko@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
I do have a cause, though; it is obscenity. I’m for it. Thank you. Unfortunately, the civil liberties types who are fighting this issue have to fight it, owing to the nature of the laws, as a matter of freedom of speech and stifling of free expression and so on, but we know what’s really involved: dirty books are fun! That’s all there is to it. But you can’t get up in a court and say that, I suppose.
Tom Lehrer
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Oi! You got a license for that step-sibling?
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s in there somewhere, I was looking for it. Might need to check the other side.
MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 2 weeks ago
What are you doing, step-neighbor?
HowAbt2day@futurology.today 2 weeks ago
I was thinking the same thing. It’ll be back to neighbors and brother’s best friend.
We’ve got Therians and MOGgers to replace the steps.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Which is more believable anyway, so I’m not really sure why it changed.
Xenny@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It turns out this isn’t a censorship ban or anything of the sort. The UK prime ministers are just tired of the unoriginality.
GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
“Playing GTA will make you kill hookers and steal cars! Just like watching porn will make you commit incest and pedophilia!”
hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
what happens if two bro’s swap semen and then their parents get married and they are step bro’s but they stop the fucking, is that ok?
and who will be watching all this porn to check?
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Isn’t that all porn? 🤣
GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Oi! You got a loicense fer that stepmum?
6stringringer@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I don’t know how my sister is going to get fee pizza from now on. Damnit.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
I’ve never understood why this theme became so popular in porn. But also, it’s porn. If you’re watching it for the plot, you should probably be watching something else.
But obviously, this is more about banning something than actually an issue with the porn. Oiling up that slippery slope.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I think a lot of it is because it makes writing really easy. You don’t need to come up with a reason for these two people to be near each other in an intimate setting, which they can easily turn into something more sexual. Not many people are watching for the plot, so they just need a bare bones contrivance for it taking place.
MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You never quit beating your meat mid-fap because the plot was just so captivating?
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
There was one that really stuck with me. This poor homeowner needed a plumber but she had no cash. It was a harrowing story of love and loss, and the climax was stunning.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Hey, that lamp is really nice…where can I buy it?
Master@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I think because in order to product the kink you need to set a ground base for story. A lot of people just want some sort of story instead of just straight into it.
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
I think incest / 'stepcest' stuff is largely popular because:
- it can sprout innumerous plotlines, whereas most visual porn lacks story - the “domestic” nature of it means they don’t have to shell out for multiple sets or fancy sets. - The idea of other people breaking laws and putting themselves in danger seems to add to the dopamine hit of porn. Which is mabe why some people consume violent stuff.
In my op it’s popular with viewers largely because it is favoured by the studios.
I have to say though, from back in my porn watching days, i couldn’t stand the weird production quality in all the step-incest stuff. And the compulsion to pair up performers who have a big age gap, or to make performers look like teenagers, is disturbing. I doubt these things have changed.
It’s funny to imagine that the government might have a porn-Tsar who is just banning all the stuff they personally consider shite. Should have been me.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
Porn-Tsar is my new favorite word.
thatsnomayo@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
I cannot answer this without sounding completely insane, even after the Epstein files people still won’t believe me
Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
There is a specific group that is in control of most of the porn websites. Lets just say they are super into it.
KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Families have inherent relationships built that can be nodded at without much conversation being necessary. Basically porn with plot without requiring as much plot.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
because actual parental incest would fire up America’s family values.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
Don’t look too closely at family trees in the Bible Belt.