FishFace
@FishFace@piefed.social
- Comment on Who also enjoys this? 3 days ago:
hhehehe
- Comment on No Screens Before Two: Inside The UK’s Tough New Guidance For Babies And Toddlers 3 days ago:
I have no desire to be a parent but trying to avoid addicting your kids to tech sounds like a nightmare on top of a nightmare.
- Comment on Honkin' Melons 3 days ago:
Melons do taste rubbish
- Comment on Americans be like: 4 days ago:
It is kind of crazy how price controls suddenly become fashionable when there’s a shortage. Like yeah, that’s how this whole “supply and demand” thing works!
- Comment on Sent this to the FWB yesterday but never heard back from him 5 days ago:
It’s because only psychos put a space in butthole!
- Comment on My friend Charlie is back.... 5 days ago:
I find this happens to me if I panic and do the stretch too quickly. But if I do it at fast but measured pace it works every time.
My dad told be the trick at a time when I was getting night cramps often and it changed my life
- Comment on optimal amount of syrup 5 days ago:
The honeycomb theorem is actually better than that: there isn’t any way to divide up the plane with equal-area shapes (even if it’s not a tiling in the sense of having any pattern) it won’t be better than hexagons.
But that video can die in a fire!
- Comment on optimal amount of syrup 5 days ago:
Give this man a medal
- Comment on IYKYK 1 week ago:
Yeah, “sharing information” on irrelevant Lemmy threads is going to make so much difference. You’re so brave.
I don’t waste time denying baseless accusations.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 week ago:
You misspelt slacktivism.
America sneezes and the whole world catches a cold - not just because you blow up international trade, but because you see your grievances as the most important thing, so that they are relevant in every situation, so we’ve all got to suffer through your self-absorption.
Do the internet equivalent of wearing a face mask.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 week ago:
You’re making it my problem to block every one of the thousands of people that post off-topic on their grievances in every light hearted thread, so no. I am going to make it your problem, because you’re being annoying and socially inept. I’m sorry that that’s not nice to hear, but I don’t say it to be cruel, only in the hopes of achieving a better outcome for everyone.
Restricting yourself to posting about privacy and politics in threads that are relevant is not a big ask.
- Comment on IYKYK 1 week ago:
Because nobody cares that people can tell what store they went to for some DIY supplies, and the OP isn’t even lauding the place.
We get it, it’s your special interest. It ain’t ours.
- Comment on Frying chicken? Taking a leak? It's a mystery. 🤔 1 week ago:
That’s just where it’s stored. If it’s coming out of them (like, directly), then you need to see a doctor.
It should be coming out of your butt.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
So, you are unhinged and are treating this completely different than comparable situations.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
We get it, you hate the company, for a variety of reasonable and unreasonable things.
And because of that, you hate all its users and have no qualms about assaulting them.
I no longer know which thread this is because voyager isn’t showing context, so if your reply was off the point I don’t gonna correct you.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
The glasses aren’t designed to secretly take pictures. They’re designed to make it quite hard to take pictures secretly, by having an LED that comes on to notify others, and a mechanism to detect if the LED is covered.
So, if the light isn’t on, and if someone wearing them isn’t constantly rotating their head to look at you, are still beating them up?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
Don’t have any, obviously 🙄
So, are you going to cut the conspiracy crap until you have evidence? Thought not.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
And why will they think that? Is it because I may have a phone in my hand, because I do use a phone quite a lot, and they can be used to film people.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
I didn’t grasp that by “recording” what you meant was “taking a picture every so often”, no.
How often, then are you saying they turn on the camera, focus and expose, capture the picture, wake up the SoC, and power the radio to send the data off somewhere?
Should be relatively easy to test this by monitoring current flow to the camera, right?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
You think over 99% of people turning up for the meta glasses street brawl are in favour of punching people for wearing the wrong glasses?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
Making people uncomfortable is not solely the problem of that person, no, but it would be entirely inappropriate for the glasses-wearer to respond by punching the person making them feel uncomfortable.
I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say here. “Being made to feel uncomfortable” is on a completely different level than being physically assaulted.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
Recording from a camera consumes upwards of 1W on mobile platforms. With the ~160mAh battery in Ray Ban Meta smart glasses, the battery would last about 40 minutes, assuming they are doing nothing else. Given that the radio needs to be powered to upload that footage somewhere, and doing all this will keep the SoC in a higher wake state, that is a very optimistic upper bound.
I’m sorry that you and everyone who downvoted me think that hating on Meta is more real than physics.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
If you believe that the ends always justify the means you have no argument against political violence used against you except that the ends are wrong… so we’re back to square one, and fighting in the street over every political disagreement. Congrats.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
Control of the public sphere is not a hallmark of fascism, no. Control of the private sphere is.
Either way though, using violence to force your political views on others is more fascist and more wrong than any amount of surveillance.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
Explaining to the judge in what court case? When some of the keyboard warriors here are in the dock for assault? Or for some imagined crime of “recording a video of me”?
I actually don’t think Meta breaks gdpr that badly, and I know for a fact they don’t upload video all the time, because it’s not physically possible.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
I feel like if the problem is being recorded, it doesn’t matter whether it’s done with a hidden or visible camera.
I feel like if the problem is being secretly recorded, you should be just as mad at bags possibly being used to xonceal a recording phone as at these glasses.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
Yeah, that would be very different than punching them, obviously?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
The glasses are very chunky. They have a light to show they’re recording, and if you deliberately disable it you could just as well conceal your phone or whatever in a bag.
There’s nothing wrong with hating Zuck, but that shouldn’t extend to uncritically hating everything relating to him and his companies to the point where you’re willing to advocate or excuse violence against his customers, which is happening here.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
A simple back-of-the-envelope calculation involving battery capacity and power consumption puts that idea to bed.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 1 week ago:
I am aware. If the yanks want to copy it then they should
- overthrow the orange turd
- campaign for it democratically
not go around punching people for violating a legal right they do not have. Your discomfort at maybe having your picture doesn’t entitle you to violence.