Cool, now ban the countdown chips that brick ink and printers that are still perfectly serviceable.
Los Angeles aims to ban single-use printer cartridges — new ordinance will target ink and toner that can't be properly recycled
Submitted 7 hours ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
aeronmelon@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
sidebro@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
Hey this was actually some good news in regards to US laws for once.
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 hours ago
Here in the state of California, we still have the qualified in regulatory positions. Hell, I think we already reintegrated with the WHO.
sidebro@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
I’m glad to read that, keep that up! 🤗
Sunspear@piefed.social 2 hours ago
TIL ordnance and ordinance are two distinct words with distinct meanings
PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 2 hours ago
Which in practice will simply drive up the price: like refundable deposits
babyfarmer@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
I remember years ago seeing a list of the “most expensive liquids in the world”, and black printer ink was near the top of the list.
Other things on the list were scorpion venom, cobra venom, crab blood, insulin, things of that nature.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
You can blame Kodak for that. Printers used to be expensive and ink cheap but then Kodak flipped the business model and made a ton. Other printer companies were losing it so the flipped as well. You can also blame the consumers for choosing that model as well I guess
tux7350@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Looking into the history of Kodak is crazy. They used a 13 month calendar and secretly kept a nuclear reactor in the basement for years.
People forget that Kodak was a chemical company, not just photography.
certified_expert@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Repeat after me: plastic does not recycle. It inevitably degrades in the process.
Regarding printers… ink tanks is the only sensible answer.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
Laser is the answer. Inkjet dries and clogs the jets if not used often like back when it was invented. Hardly anyone prints like that anymore.
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Only problem with laser is the desk size for color laser. If you don’t print very often, and you want color, a laser can take up space.
crank0271@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Community ink tanks, with pipelines to transmit the ink from where it is mined to substations, and on and on.
SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
The children yearn for the ink mines?
BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
I want a clam chowder pipe straight into the kitchen.
errer@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Water pipelines to the home. Gas pipelines to the home. Ink pipelines to the home. It just makes sense.
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
We also need some sort of way to prevent heads from drying out so quickly.
Printer companies know heads dry out, and they ship tanks with caps / tape for prevent dry out on retail store shelves. But once the tanks are installed, printers just leave the heads exposed to the air. Like a pen without a cap, the tanks dry out.
I print like 5 times a year. So 90% of the time, when I’m replacing a tank, it’s because the damn head dried out.
ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
Laser printers don’t have this problem. Their medium is already a dry powder!
RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 4 hours ago
I love the idea but I don’t see how it will be enforceable. Companies routinely ignore California laws if they only exist in California.
ooterness@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
This is just for city of Los Angeles, which is a small portion of Los Angeles county, let alone the entire state of California.
AA5B@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Seems like the headline and article itself are missing the main point
printer cartridges that can’t be refilled or that don’t have a take-back program offered by the vendor.
It may be barely mentioned but I read this are requiring a program to take back cartridges
Zorque@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Are there requirements for these programs? Or can they make it as onerous as possible to disincentivize usage of said program? (More rhetorical than anything)
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
I’m in favor of ordnance targeting printers in general.
arin@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Refillable needs to be default
saltesc@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Wow. Just in time.
babyfarmer@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
[deleted]foenix@lemmy.radio 5 hours ago
I believe the cost is more to do with the electronic components. Ink cartridges are kind of like the OG disposable electronics and now we have disposable vapes.
AA5B@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Probably, but we also need to take every chance to reduce unnecessary plastic in the environment
14specks@lemmy.ml 10 minutes ago
Just FYI to people that you can get remanufactured ink cartridges for a fraction of the price (around half) of OEM. They are sometimes modified to contain more ink in the same body. The company I purchased from included a prepaid bag to send used cartridges back for reuse.
Also while I’m in PSA mode “REDUCE, REUSE, and then recycle”. Sometimes we skip over the first two steps since reducing is not marketable and reusing rarely is (although reusing printer cartridges appears to be a sustainable business).