Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

IT'S A TRAP

⁨721⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/dd931720-08dc-4eea-9268-74fc635a1e79.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • nathanjent@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    An infinite amount of people on the track implies that the track is infinitely long. If that is not the case and the track is a normal length then the sudden addition of all that bio-mass in a finite space will cause a gravitational collapse. But will the collapse start on the first track or the second? Either way I hope you saved your game because you might lose your progress.

    source
    • buttnugget@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The mass of dead bodies is what replenishes the new living ones on the finite track.

      source
      • answersplease77@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Yes. The infamious theory of infinitly-expanding train track porportionally with train-travelled distence sequared by prof. buttnugget

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’d just close my eyes and believe the bodies I’m trampling are imaginary.

    source
  • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Okay, so what’s the point of “proving” that there some “infinities” are “bigger” than others? What’s the practical application here? Because an infinite hotel with an infinite number of guests is physically impossible, so I don’t see the point.

    source
    • carmo55@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      A practical application is for example in probability theory (or anywhere that deals with measures) such as this question:

      If we generate a random real number from 0 to 1, what is the probability that it is rational?

      Because we know that the continuum is so much larger in a sense than the set of rationals, we can answer this confidently and say the probability is zero, even though it is theoretically possible for us to get a rational number.

      Statistics deals with similar scenarios quite frequently, and without it we wouldn’t have the modern scientific method.

      source
    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Practical application in math tends to be like three degrees of separation and half a century removed from the math at play. In this case, all of modern mathematics is based on set theory, so it's more that this stuff allows us to do other, more practically useful math while knowing what we're talking about.

      source
    • MBM@lemmings.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I’ve never been a fan of just saying “some infinities are bigger than others,” to be honest. Way too easy to misunderstand and it’s also kind of meaningless by itself.

      source
    • bstix@feddit.dk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The real numbers also includes the integers.

      The practical consequence of this example is that the integers die regardless of what you choose.

      However infinitely many people will survive if you choose the first option.

      source
      • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        And yet there can never, and will never, be a situation where an infinite number of people are tied to a railroad track. So this thought experiment is meaningless.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • nairui@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    fossilesque you’re one of my fav posters

    source
    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      ilu2 :)

      source
  • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    either way infinite people die, just not getting involved

    source
  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This is why it is important to only hire union trolley operators. They are trained to stop the trolley.

    source
  • p3n@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I do what I always do: run to the trolley, then jump up and pull the emergency stop because I hate false dilemmas.

    source
    • hakunawazo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Correct, because if we ignore some important facts you could also have infinite time to stop the trolley. Checkmate, false dilemma creators.

      source
  • Randelung@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    What about a time loop where only one person dies, but infinite times?

    source
  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Can I group the people into groups of 1, then 2, then 3 and so forth? When the trolley is done with the killing, it will have killed -1/12 people.

    source
  • AkatsukiLevi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Hold the lever halfway so the trolley picks both rails at the same time, to ensure highest possible kill comboq

    source
    • davidgro@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That’s effectively just the bottom track, where an uncountable number of people (literally) will die as soon as the train reaches position (0.

      source
      • AkatsukiLevi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Not with that attitude :3

        source
  • madjo@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Multilane drifting!

    source
  • answersplease77@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Actually… this means there are infinite people so:

    Let X be the number of people killed = (-infinity)

    As infity is defined :

    infinity + X = infinity

    infinity + (-infinity) =

    infinity - infinity = infinty

    So no people would have died black guy pointing at his head meme

    source
    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Desnt work when they’re different classes of infinity.

      source
  • _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It’ll make it through maybe 3 infinities before derailing. Go bottom, end it faster.

    source
  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Geez, disconnect the trains so you can hit both lines at the same time, obviously.

    source
  • Zerush@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I use the lever to kill the train driver.

    source
  • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I take the square root of all the negative real numbers and kill in an entirely new dimension.

    source
  • halvar@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    there are more real numbers than integers though

    source
    • ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The image actually says this

      source
  • TomMasz@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I remember seeing a science show on PBS where the presenter explained how there are different infinities by using set theory and the integers/reals. That was mind-blowing at the time.

    source
  • narr1@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    i asked myself: wwjd? and now i ask you because i have no idea

    source
  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I reject the premise since there will only ever exist a finite number of people. They will all die. One day the last human will die.

    source
  • bizarroland@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I would pull the lever and then steal a bus and knock the trolley off of the track, killing the least amount of people possible.

    source
  • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    sort them so you kill one person first, then 2, then 3, then 4…

    source
  • kometes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    “smallest”?

    source