Oh look, another centralized social media platform that will eventually get enshittified
Here's your first look at the rebooted Digg | TechCrunch
Submitted 13 hours ago by MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/18/heres-your-first-look-at-the-rebooted-digg/
Comments
besselj@lemmy.ca 13 hours ago
zecg@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
This one is different, it starts enshittified and enshittifies further
Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
not quite sure it’s not starting out enshittified
dil@lemmy.zip 13 hours ago
yeah it doesnt look bad at all, thatll prob come later, the ai in use right now are a nonissue imo
DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I’m looking forward to the “Here’s your first look at the rebooted Reddit” articles in 7 years.
mctoasterson@reddthat.com 12 hours ago
Maybe if they allow API access for alternative frontends that eliminate ads and block telemetry. Otherwise, not interested.
echodot@feddit.uk 4 hours ago
The hero no one wanted, or needed
But other than that. Cool
VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 12 hours ago
Worthless crap. Thank fuck we’re on a platform free of centralised ownership.
floo@retrolemmy.com 13 hours ago
No thanks
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
let me guess it's ai slop
db2@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Don’t care.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
concepts that have been whipped up in Photoshop aren’t “first looks”
ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 1 hour ago
The article says an iOS app was released to testers.
LWD@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
Oh no…
Okay, Digg has my attention again.
And they lost me again.
echodot@feddit.uk 4 hours ago
The internet has way too many AI bots, let’s add some more
- Digg logic
natecox@programming.dev 13 hours ago
That was a wild ride.
Pirate@feddit.org 4 hours ago
AI. BOTS. MILLENIAL INFANTILE DESIGN. CORPORATE SPEAK.
Gee, I wonder why people aren’t tripping over themselves to join this.
doctortofu@reddthat.com 10 hours ago
Because if there’s anything a link aggregator needs, it’s MORE reasons for people to not read linked articles! Will they also add AI responses? That way users wouldn’t need to bother with reading OR writing!
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 hours ago
What’s wrong with AI summaries? AI has it’s uses. A long as it’s just adding some metadata I don’t see nothing wrong with it.
For me the big questions is what are they going to do to stop bots, spam and internet points farming. So far they didn’t reveal any plans.
echodot@feddit.uk 4 hours ago
It never stops there though, they never just write their summary and leave it alone they always have to have the AI do more and more until it eventually takes over the entire platform.
dil@lemmy.zip 13 hours ago
Idk, its less subjective than the top comment summaries on reddit from users Image
LWD@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
I see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to “care” about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.
But then again, I’m sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.
SaltSong@startrek.website 11 hours ago
Is there some reason we want brands to join the conversation?
dil@lemmy.zip 13 hours ago
Not like itll prevent ppl from clicking on articles that alrady werent
tonytins@pawb.social 13 hours ago
Because that worked soo well for Apple.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 13 hours ago
And they realized it and fixed their mistake… hopefully…
chunes@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
It must be tiring to be this narrow-minded.