Obviously fake. You can’t buy a car that cheap.
Vintage
Submitted 1 year ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to [deleted]
https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/02d64cc0-4098-4d52-9043-5aae954b91dd.jpeg
Comments
greybeard@lemm.ee 1 year ago
mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Looks way cooler
loomy@lemy.lol 1 year ago
worth it
garbagebagel@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Okay but why does this look better than the actual thing though
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
because humans actually like smooth curves, as it turns out
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Colour! Silver is boring unless it’s a highlight.
werewolfborg@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
I’ve seen ones that were custom painted and they look significantly better. It doesn’t stop them from being dumpsters on wheels, but at least they look finished.
MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Uhhh we might not see the same thing
stewi1914@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
SIBERTRUCK
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
More desirable than the new ones. Looks like it could withstand someone spitting on it.
altphoto@lemmy.today 1 year ago
Probably lead acid batteries.
Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
More like 1988.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Clearly an 87
random_character_a@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I recently bought a wearable device from Amazon with programmable esp32 s3 board. What I got was basically buying a cybertruck and getting this.
Valmond@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Esp32s are great, what was your expectations?
random_character_a@lemmy.world 1 year ago
My expectation was to get a product with esp32 s3 from 2020, not the 2016 version.
Just like the car in the picture gets you from A to B, I can work with that chip. It’s just a pain to strip and modify stuff designed for the S3 to get at least partially working on the chip I got. Luckily I don’t need every “bell and whistle”.
gibmiser@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Lol I’ll take two
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
That vehicle has already lasted longer, and been more useful, than any of the embarrassing new ones.
Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hi, is this available?
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yes, are you still interested?
postnataldrip@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is fake.
Panel gaps are too consistent and it doesn’t look like anything has fallen off.
InFerNo@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
Survivorship bias
ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Also, as cars designed by immature adults go, it might just look better than the real thing.
huquad@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
Even survives car washes. Fake as hell
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Things were just built better back then
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hi, how many miles per gallon does it get?
nthavoc@lemmy.today 1 year ago
It gets 13 gallons per mile.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Miles, plural??
Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Smiles per gallon
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 year ago
Hi, how many
miles per gallongallons per mile does it get?FTFY.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ironic, gallons per mile is actually a more useful measure for high fuel efficiency vehicles because it directly represents fuel consumption. Differences in MPG are more misleading to intuition as MPG increases.
For example, upgrading from an 18mpg car to a 28mpg car saves more fuel than upgrading from a 34mpg car to a 50mpg car. It is easy to be misled that 34mpg -> 50mpg is more savings because it is an upgrade of 16mpg rather than only 10mpg.
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 year ago
here is the original 1976 cyber truck
Image