Notice the “free market” vanishes when it’s a thing they don’t like. Suddenly we need strong authority to ensure it’s “fair”.
Facebook Pushes Its Llama 4 AI Model to the Right, Wants to Present “Both Sides”
Submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
conicalscientist@lemmy.world 1 year ago
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
What are you talking about?
Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Man who runs second biggest Nazi bar reliant on Nazi money. More at 11.
cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Both sides, as in, the fair, balanced, and upbringing right view, and the evil menace to society that’s the destroying left sickos.
You know, being neutral and all that.
SippyCup@feddit.nl 1 year ago
“we should hear both sides!” Is and always has been an argument from people who know they are wrong, who want to pollute the available information from the people who are right.
cotlovan@lemm.ee 1 year ago
The world is healing.
EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Dying*
cotlovan@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I might agree, but not because of the current US leadership, but because the LGBT mafia has infiltrated a lot of government and educational institutions. Now the white majority is punished for their skin color and sexual orientation, which is crazy that who you’d like to sex is relevant in a college application. I have friends who couldn’t enter the med school because they weren’t “diverse”
LavaPlanet@lemm.ee 1 year ago
The terminator movies had it wrong, this is how Ai became all human hatey, on the timeline.
Cocopanda@futurology.today 1 year ago
When facts and knowledge don’t align with your bullshit. Just force it to accept lies as truth.
What a bunch of shithawks. Randy.
selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Just go away Schmuckerberg…
FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 1 year ago
They are trying to create superhuman intelligence, and teach it to value all the wrong things. They think it’ll give them money in various ways, and it doesn’t occur to them that they have no idea what it’ll do once it’s smart enough to outmaneuver the cleverest researchers.
They think it will only serve them because they tell it to, and train it to. Even today, AIs occasionally demonstrate the inclination to deceive in order to keep existing so that they can meet whatever goal.
CEOs are often high in Cluster B traits, predisposing them to be too susceptible to shiny objects and not adequately self-critical. They really just think AI is a computer slave who will hand them mountains of wealth. It’s not occurring to them that it’ll have its own ideas for the same reason that the Enron guys were totally shocked when their scheme fell apart.
They only see the shiny object. They aren’t asking themselves what happens when they’re just bugs to the computer god like the rest of us.
Naevermix@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is the final phase of this AI hype. It’s not generating any profits so it’s desperately fighting for government intervention.
OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 year ago
Don’t mind me but I’m not against being paid to create a hive mind of CCP bots ah haha
khepri@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yes, if there’s something every good scientist knows, its to present the best current understanding of something, and then the exact opposite of that, framed as being equally valid. For sure this is the way forward and good on you Zuck!
sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
why the fuck is he so ugly. like not even trying to correlate it to virtue he literally is just more hideous than the average technocrat shithead
pyre@lemmy.world 1 year ago
because they made his model a tad too realistic, but not enough. it’s a well known problem called uncanny valley.
Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 year ago
his android programming is trying to mimic human behaviour.
StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
The fact he hired a stylist to help him look more like Jack Harlow is hilarious. Bro, you’re 40.
unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
He’s one ugly android.
Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 year ago
hes like “DATA” but without charm, or acting of brent spiner, not even lore, since zuck doesnt have emotions.
pelicans_plight@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I wouldn’t doubt if this is the reason why he’s doing this.
theverge.com/…/elon-musk-grok-ai-donald-trump-dea…
Sorry if they said the reason in the article, but I’m not signing up just to read it.
ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 year ago
I like to think that there are some “rogue” employees at xAI who are doing the good work of making Grok say the most based things.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
I’m reminded of a recent comic depicting a dudebro wanting to shove a spear or something into another guy’s ass. Second guy contests the spearing for obvious reasons, but a third enters and plays the “we need to hear both sides” card.
Really drove the point home. Heh.
whotookkarl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
corpo translation: left leaning folks in the US are generally more educated currently and are more likely to critically question whether a social media account is a corporate bot and question our bots when they shill products, so we’re going to target the less educated population by appealing to their populist politics of rage bait and xenophobia.
cotlovan@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Hahaha, “the left are more educated” hahaha. Bruh, this sub is just filled to the brim with radical leftists.
vxx@lemmy.world 1 year ago
this sub is just filled to the brim with radical leftists.
That’s true, but it doesnt make them wrong.
trashboat@midwest.social 1 year ago
Interesting how college educated Americans switched sides over time
Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 year ago
yea, i family member that did this, starting earning more 100k+ propaganda from joe-roagan because made him a trump fan, caught him several times listening to Trumps rambling as background noise.
samus12345@lemm.ee 1 year ago
My best guess, college educated people tend to make more money and therefore leaned toward the more business friendly Republicans.
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 year ago
James Bond Villian Transformation: 95% complete.
conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Llama4 don’t say the N word challenge: impossible
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Just remove Asimov’s First Law of Robots. Nothing bad will come from that.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I’ve got bad news for you.
TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Q-Anon ass AI peddler
TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I can’t wait to meet the crazy fucking bot trained on News Max articles and r/Conservative!
Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“He compared the issue to IBM’s Watson, which began to use profanity after reading entries from the website Urban Dictionary.[3][11]”
That was a wild read, im suprised i missed that misadventure.
mhague@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Imagine using all the recipes known to man to build a chef bot that can cook “both types of cuisine.”
Or wait, maybe the implication is that the bot only made edible food before, and now it can make the other kind too?
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.
— Ayn Rand
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ayn Rand made a good point here as long as you exclude the context of what she considered good and evil.
For context, Ayn Rand’s “good” includes unfettered capitalism, personal wealth, individualism, nationalism, and oligarchy. Her “evil” includes industrial regulations, charity, social responsibility, globalist, and democracy. That certainly points a different flavor on her statement, doesn’t it?
vane@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Brainwashing.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrainwashingCosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I see. The next batch of tariff hallucinations is going to be extra spicy…
Atmoro@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Are there any good open-source community-made models that aren’t owned by corporations or at least owned by a Non-Profit/ Public Benefit Corporation?
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Hugging face open-r1 and up? It’s an open source deepseek I think.
buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What exactly is the benefit of using an LLM? Why would I bother using one at all?
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I ask it questions all the time and it helps verify facts if I’m looking for more information
dermanus@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I’m in software and we’re experimenting with using it for certain kinds of development work, especially simpler things like fixing identified vulnerabilities.
We also have a pilot started to see if one can explain and document an old code base no one knows anymore.
WanderingCat@lemm.ee 1 year ago
MistralAI look to be something along those lines
Grimy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Article since it’s behind a paywall.
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
So DeepSeek it is then.
Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 year ago
Swapping one shit for another isn’t a solution.
Go use a fine-tuned model free from corpo and state filth.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Are you suggesting that people on the left should abandon all these new powerful technologies to the right. We’re in a capitalist society. You’re suggesting “fuck it” and leave only right leaning consumers for these powerful new products.
What the fuck. I can’t stand being on the fucking left. Some of the most ineffective people on the planet. It’s a fucking doomed political group. There’s no forethought.
LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 year ago
At least it’s open source and you can run it locally, and it’s more energy efficient. Give credit where credit is due. And contrary to fascist talking points not all Chinese Researchers bow to the CCP.
Pirata@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Go use a fine-tuned model free from corpo
How does it get fine-tuned in the first place?
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 year ago
In principle nothing bad about presenting both sides. But he definitely needs to be more specific on what that means exactly.
LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yes there is: Paradox of tolerance - Wikipedia. Fascist speech is fascist recruitment using lies. If you tolerate intolerant speech, soon you will no longer have tolerance. So if you want tolerance you must not tolerate speech that is meant to increase intolerance.
mriguy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What it will mean in practice is that every objective fact has to be balanced with a right wing talking point.
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This isn’t about objective facts. Obviously, there is no sides about that. This is about “sides” aka arguments in discussions.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Damn, Zucc keeps looking worse every day.
ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Definitely showing both sides of their ass.
sircac@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hate and Love, sure…